Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Newsgroups > Vista installation & setup

Vista - Program Files & Program Files (x86)???

Reply
 
Old 07-31-2008   #1 (permalink)
Ron O'Brien


 
 

Program Files & Program Files (x86)???

Having just installed Vista Ultimate 64bit I'm left wondering why so much
space has been taken up on my hard drives by what appears to be a repeat of
the program files folder.

I have one folder named Program Files and another named Program Files(x86)
both appear to contain the same files although the (x86) version seems to be
the one that programs go into - I've just installed WinZip which appears in
there.

So what's with this crazy method of filling up your hard drive - has
Microsoft bought shares in a hard drive manufacturer?


--
Ron O'Brien


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-31-2008   #2 (permalink)


home premium vista (64bit)
 
 

Re: Program Files & Program Files (x86)???

the Program Files are your (64bit) files and the (Program Files(x86) ) are your (32bit)
files. your system needs both so don't try to delete any of them.
scrooge
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-31-2008   #3 (permalink)
Malke


 
 

Re: Program Files & Program Files (x86)???

Ron O'Brien wrote:
Quote:

> Having just installed Vista Ultimate 64bit I'm left wondering why so much
> space has been taken up on my hard drives by what appears to be a repeat
> of the program files folder.
>
> I have one folder named Program Files and another named Program Files(x86)
> both appear to contain the same files although the (x86) version seems to
> be the one that programs go into - I've just installed WinZip which
> appears in there.
>
> So what's with this crazy method of filling up your hard drive - has
> Microsoft bought shares in a hard drive manufacturer?
>
>
The x86 directory is fir 32-bit programs and the plain Program Files
directory is for 64-bit programs. WinZip is a 32-bit program so that is why
it goes into the x86 directory.

Instead of assuming that what you see is a "crazy method", it would better
serve you to do some reading about 64-bit operating systems.

There is a newsgroup for Vista 64-bit, too. Find it here:

http://aumha.org/nntp.htm - list of MS newsgroups

Malke
--
MS-MVP
Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
FAQ - http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-31-2008   #4 (permalink)
Ron O'Brien


 
 

Re: Program Files & Program Files (x86)???


"Malke" <malke@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eSUJHZw8IHA.1196@xxxxxx
..
Quote:

>
> Instead of assuming that what you see is a "crazy method", it would better
> serve you to do some reading about 64-bit operating systems.
>
Thank you for your patronising comment - but it still seems a crazy waste of
space :-)

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-31-2008   #5 (permalink)
Mike Hall - MVP


 
 

Re: Program Files & Program Files (x86)???

"Ron O'Brien" <castcall@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uMu22jw8IHA.3944@xxxxxx
Quote:

>
> "Malke" <malke@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:eSUJHZw8IHA.1196@xxxxxx
> .
Quote:

>>
>> Instead of assuming that what you see is a "crazy method", it would
>> better
>> serve you to do some reading about 64-bit operating systems.
>>
>
> Thank you for your patronising comment - but it still seems a crazy waste
> of space :-)

32 and 64bit are two different platforms, and the 32bit programs run in a
64bit environment have to be treated differently, hence the two folders.

As Malke suggested to you, people should read up on the 'benefits' of 64bit
before blindly assuming that it is just a generally faster version of 32bit
(which it isn't incidentally).

--
Mike Hall - MVP
How to construct a good post..
http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
http://support.microsoft.com/default...help&style=toc
Mike's Window - My Blog..
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx




My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-31-2008   #6 (permalink)
Malke


 
 

Re: Program Files & Program Files (x86)???

Ron O'Brien wrote:
Quote:

>
> "Malke" <malke@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:eSUJHZw8IHA.1196@xxxxxx
> .
Quote:

>>
>> Instead of assuming that what you see is a "crazy method", it would
>> better serve you to do some reading about 64-bit operating systems.
>>
>
> Thank you for your patronising comment - but it still seems a crazy waste
> of space :-)
Sorry you took it as patronizing. Actually, I was trying to be nice since my
first impulse was to comment on your assumption that this behavior was
caused by Microsoft in conspiracy with hard drive mftrs. That comment would
not have been as polite as merely telling you that reading up on what a
64-bit operating system is would be a good step for you.

I stand by my advice. If you're going to use a 64-bit operating system, you
should understand what it is, what it does, and what it doesn't do.

End of story for me.

Malke
--
MS-MVP
Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
FAQ - http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-31-2008   #7 (permalink)
JW


 
 

Re: Program Files & Program Files (x86)???

If you check the actual space being used you will probably find that the 64
bit Program Files contains only directory information for the actual 32 bit
files that are in the 32 bit program files folder. The amount of space is
probably minimal and as more and more of your 32 bit programs are replaced
by 64 bit programs the number of entries in the 32bit program files will
decrease.
"Ron O'Brien" <castcall@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uMu22jw8IHA.3944@xxxxxx
Quote:

>
> "Malke" <malke@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:eSUJHZw8IHA.1196@xxxxxx
> .
Quote:

>>
>> Instead of assuming that what you see is a "crazy method", it would
>> better
>> serve you to do some reading about 64-bit operating systems.
>>
>
> Thank you for your patronising comment - but it still seems a crazy waste
> of space :-)
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-31-2008   #8 (permalink)
Ron O'Brien


 
 

Re: Program Files & Program Files (x86)???


"Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@xxxxxx_mvps.com> wrote in message
news:OqbCUqw8IHA.5700@xxxxxx
Quote:

>
> As Malke suggested to you, people should read up on the 'benefits' of
> 64bit before blindly assuming that it is just a generally faster version
> of 32bit (which it isn't incidentally).
>
> --
Yes 64bit speed is a strange misconception, I suppose people associate speed
with efficiency, it seems to me that any speed gain apparent by 64bit has
more to do with the amount of RAM installed possibly

Ron

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-31-2008   #9 (permalink)
Mike Hall - MVP


 
 

Re: Program Files & Program Files (x86)???

"Ron O'Brien" <castcall@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eifuLIx8IHA.3848@xxxxxx
Quote:

>
> "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@xxxxxx_mvps.com> wrote in message
> news:OqbCUqw8IHA.5700@xxxxxx
Quote:

>>
>> As Malke suggested to you, people should read up on the 'benefits' of
>> 64bit before blindly assuming that it is just a generally faster version
>> of 32bit (which it isn't incidentally).
>>
>> --
> Yes 64bit speed is a strange misconception, I suppose people associate
> speed with efficiency, it seems to me that any speed gain apparent by
> 64bit has more to do with the amount of RAM installed possibly
>
> Ron

64bit relates to the chunk size of data able to be moved around. In
principle, this should improve speed by a factor of 2 over 32bit. If
applications move a lot of data around, assuming that they are 64bit, there
will be speed improvements. Most applications in general use don't move much
around at all.

Eventually, everything will be 64bit, and by that time, commercial stuff
will be 128bit, and the cycle starts again..

Unless you are big into photo, video or sound editing, or into CAD, there is
not a huge argument for using 64bit at this time.

I would give it a whirl just for the sake of it, but I use OneNote 2007 to
archive mail. There is no way to do this if I use Vista 64bit, and there
will not be until the next incarnation of Office. I don't do anything which
specifically requires more than 4gb, so I stay with 32bit. Bragging rights
are worthless if simple stuff can no longer be done.

--
Mike Hall - MVP
How to construct a good post..
http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
http://support.microsoft.com/default...help&style=toc
Mike's Window - My Blog..
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx




My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-31-2008   #10 (permalink)


Vista x64 Ultimate
 
 

Re: Program Files & Program Files (x86)???

I have run across many 32-bit apps that can't install to Program Files (x86). Adobe Photoshop CS2 is one of them. They want Program Files. Why did Microsoft come up with adding ( ) to a directory name is beyond me.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
What is the difference between c:\Program Files and C:\Program Files(x86)? Vista General
wshshell.run a program from Program Files VB Script
Solved Deleting program files and keeping program files x86? General Discussion
Moving Program Files and Program Data Vista General
Spyware .exe program won't save or run into Program Files folder Vista General


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46