![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Vista Experience Index Hello, I have an Intel C2D E6600 CPU installed on an Asus P5W DH Deluxe motherboard. I recently installed Vista Home Premium (32bit) with a hard drive configuration of one Western Digital 10k SATA drive (for system and application files) and two Seagate 320gig SATA2 drives. I had a spare SCSI Fujitsu 10K 36gig drive (I connected it to a LSI SCSI adapter), so I thought that I would configure a dual boot system with Windows XP and Vista - one OS on each 10K drive. I did not have much success with getting the dual boot function to work. However, I was able to install Vista on the 10K Fujitsu SCSI drive and, provided the Fujitsu was set as the boot drive in the motherboard's bios, I was able to boot into Vista. If I set the 10K SATA drive as the boot device in the bios, I was also able to then boot into XP. When running Vista with this configuration, I noted that the Windows Experience Index was rated at 5.6. I guess if I persevered with this configuration I would have been able to get the dual boot function to work (I had used VistaBoot Pro). Anyway, I thought that if both drives were on the same interface, dual booting would be easier to achieve. So I took out the 10K SATA drive and replaced it with a 36gig (10K) IBM SCSI drive configured off the same SCSI PCI adapter. Both drives have seperate SCSI IDs and are on the same channel with an active terminator at the end of the connecting SCSI cable. I was able to install Win XP on the replacement drive (IBM SCSI) and eventually was able to get the PC to dual boot to Vista and XP (Vista being the default OS). Now after all that rambling, I was surprised to see that the Windows Experience Index, with this configuration, drop to 4.7(being the primary hard disk reading)! Considering that both drives are 10K drives as well as being SCSI (which I though was the faster interface compared to IDE and SATA), I am stumped as to why this is so. Would the installation of the PCI SCSI card itself which slows down the boot process have anything to do with this drop in performance? Thank you, Shane |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vista not displaying Windows Experience Index | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| 7150m getting low vista experience index. | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Window Vista Experience index base scores !! | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Vista RTM Windows Experience Index | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Vista Experience Index Crash | Vista General | |||