![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #21 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Have I blundered? Problem is that Windows does volume processing on all visible volumes, and the data in the Vista volume appears corrupt to XP so it deletes it. "cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user)" <cquirkenews@nospam.mvps.org> wrote in message news p70c3dffhvp7p972mvnjs1ar4korvbnb4@4ax.com...> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:13:36 -0700, "John Barnes" wrote: > >>> Or do you exclude the Vista HD from XP's System Restore? > >>Does not protect Vista Restore points. > > Bummer - it should, if MS designed their OS safely. > > This is in contrast to "hiding" the Vista volume(s) drive letter(s) in > XP's TweakUI, which is known not to work either. > > If XP is set to not SR a volume, it shouldn't touch the thing, and if > the volume is FATxx, you can delete any \SVI it created there. > > The challenge is then to KEEP this disabled, as if the volume goes > away and comes back, XP duuuuuhfaults back to drooling SR all over it > again. Also, it's a tricky thing to catch SR's dialog box at the > right time; too early, and volumes you want to protect are not listed > in it, and too late, it will have already started drooling away. > > No Windows version has been a safe platform for at-risk HDs since > WinME's System Restore. Any HD visible will immediately attract > unsolicited writes... the safety clue is Just Not There. See... > > http://cquirke.spaces.live.com/blog/...8C23!289.entry > > >>--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - > I'm *not* indignant! >>--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - |
My System Specs![]() |