![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Blocking images from Junk emails In Windows Mail, I have the setting to block images set to on, so, whenever a message in html format arrives, if it has images and the sender was not set as trustable yet, it will block the images. But, funny side is that the feature seems not to work for the junk emails which makes no sense at all. All my junk emails, if in html format and with images, images will be shown despite the setting. Am I missing some other setting or this is supposed to be the right although odd behaviour for Windows Mail? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Blocking images from Junk emails That setting normally works quite well. Perhaps you are using a third party security program that is preventing changes to the registry, and thereby is blocking WM setting changes from being saved. Incidentally, if you upgrade to Windows Live Mail, it automatically blanks the preview pane for any email judged to be Junk E-Mail. http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview -- Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:0DC5633B-FFCC-40D2-8C49-A2937A548191@xxxxxx Quote: > In Windows Mail, I have the setting to block images set to on, so, whenever a > message in html format arrives, if it has images and the sender was not set > as trustable yet, it will block the images. > > But, funny side is that the feature seems not to work for the junk emails > which makes no sense at all. All my junk emails, if in html format and with > images, images will be shown despite the setting. > > Am I missing some other setting or this is supposed to be the right although > odd behaviour for Windows Mail? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Blocking images from Junk emails The only third party security program I use is Symantec Antivirus 10.2, no other application at all, besides Vista own ones. I don't think it looks at registry keys. Is Windows Live Mail better than Windows Mail? If so, why Vista comes with Windows Mail and not Windows Live Mail? What's the difference? I'm waiting for an Office 2007 DVD to arrive (it's on back order, believe it or not) and then I'll have Outlook but I did want Windows Mail to act accordingly. Thx "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: Quote: > That setting normally works quite well. > Perhaps you are using a third party security program that is preventing > changes to the registry, and thereby is blocking WM setting changes > from being saved. > > Incidentally, if you upgrade to Windows Live Mail, it automatically > blanks the preview pane for any email judged to be Junk E-Mail. > http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview > > -- > Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) > > > "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:0DC5633B-FFCC-40D2-8C49-A2937A548191@xxxxxx Quote: > > In Windows Mail, I have the setting to block images set to on, so, whenever a > > message in html format arrives, if it has images and the sender was not set > > as trustable yet, it will block the images. > > > > But, funny side is that the feature seems not to work for the junk emails > > which makes no sense at all. All my junk emails, if in html format and with > > images, images will be shown despite the setting. > > > > Am I missing some other setting or this is supposed to be the right although > > odd behaviour for Windows Mail? > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Blocking images from Junk emails "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:21651B66-CAD6-4C03-8AAF-2B768455934D@xxxxxx Quote: > The only third party security program I use is Symantec Antivirus 10.2, no > other application at all, besides Vista own ones. I don't think it looks > at > registry keys. in Windows Mail although seldom immediately, also comes from Symantec. I don't know how much they copied over to their other antivirus family, but it would be interesting to have to wait a few months to find out if it includes the parts causing the problems. Quote: > Is Windows Live Mail better than Windows Mail? If so, why Vista comes > with > Windows Mail and not Windows Live Mail? What's the difference? I'm > waiting > for an Office 2007 DVD to arrive (it's on back order, believe it or not) > and > then I'll have Outlook but I did want Windows Mail to act accordingly. > > Thx > thinks Windows Live Mail is better, since they seem to have stopped releasing updates for Windows Mail. The main reason why Windows Live Mail wasn't included in Vista seems to be that it wasn't ready in time. Quote: > > "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: > Quote: >> That setting normally works quite well. >> Perhaps you are using a third party security program that is preventing >> changes to the registry, and thereby is blocking WM setting changes >> from being saved. >> >> Incidentally, if you upgrade to Windows Live Mail, it automatically >> blanks the preview pane for any email judged to be Junk E-Mail. >> http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview >> >> -- >> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) >> >> >> "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:0DC5633B-FFCC-40D2-8C49-A2937A548191@xxxxxx Quote: >> > In Windows Mail, I have the setting to block images set to on, so, >> > whenever a >> > message in html format arrives, if it has images and the sender was not >> > set >> > as trustable yet, it will block the images. >> > >> > But, funny side is that the feature seems not to work for the junk >> > emails >> > which makes no sense at all. All my junk emails, if in html format and >> > with >> > images, images will be shown despite the setting. >> > >> > Am I missing some other setting or this is supposed to be the right >> > although >> > odd behaviour for Windows Mail? >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Blocking images from Junk emails Windows Live Mail was released in November of last year, some 12 months after Vista was finalized, so you see why it wasn't included. Windows Mail was (in my opinion) a stop-gap measure. Windows Live Mail does everything Windows Mail does, plus it has many additional features: Able to accommodate Hotmail/MSN accounts. Real-time spell checker (like in Outlook, it marks typos immediately with a red squiggly underline). Auto-correction of commonly misspelled words (changes 'teh' to 'the', and 'i' to 'I'). Better auto-completion when typing in recipients. Contacts group feature is more flexible. -- Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:21651B66-CAD6-4C03-8AAF-2B768455934D@xxxxxx Quote: > The only third party security program I use is Symantec Antivirus 10.2, no > other application at all, besides Vista own ones. I don't think it looks at > registry keys. > > Is Windows Live Mail better than Windows Mail? If so, why Vista comes with > Windows Mail and not Windows Live Mail? What's the difference? I'm waiting > for an Office 2007 DVD to arrive (it's on back order, believe it or not) and > then I'll have Outlook but I did want Windows Mail to act accordingly. > > Thx > > > "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: > Quote: >> That setting normally works quite well. >> Perhaps you are using a third party security program that is preventing >> changes to the registry, and thereby is blocking WM setting changes >> from being saved. >> >> Incidentally, if you upgrade to Windows Live Mail, it automatically >> blanks the preview pane for any email judged to be Junk E-Mail. >> http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview >> >> -- >> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) >> >> >> "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:0DC5633B-FFCC-40D2-8C49-A2937A548191@xxxxxx Quote: >> > In Windows Mail, I have the setting to block images set to on, so, whenever a >> > message in html format arrives, if it has images and the sender was not set >> > as trustable yet, it will block the images. >> > >> > But, funny side is that the feature seems not to work for the junk emails >> > which makes no sense at all. All my junk emails, if in html format and with >> > images, images will be shown despite the setting. >> > >> > Am I missing some other setting or this is supposed to be the right although >> > odd behaviour for Windows Mail? >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Blocking images from Junk emails OK, I'm convinced then that it's a good upgrade. I'll install it. Thanks. About the issue with Windows Mail, now I found that some junk emails have their pictures blocked, some have not (I deselected, applied and selected again and applied again the option to make sure Windows Mail get it). My guess is that for the emails that are not blocked, their pictures are not linked to a site but rather embeded into the message. I can't still tell that this is the case because I didn't figure out yet how to read the source code of the message in Windows Mail (I am a Vista novice...). "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: Quote: > Windows Live Mail was released in November of last year, some > 12 months after Vista was finalized, so you see why it wasn't included. > Windows Mail was (in my opinion) a stop-gap measure. > Windows Live Mail does everything Windows Mail does, plus it has > many additional features: > > Able to accommodate Hotmail/MSN accounts. > > Real-time spell checker (like in Outlook, it marks typos immediately > with a red squiggly underline). > > Auto-correction of commonly misspelled words (changes 'teh' > to 'the', and 'i' to 'I'). > > Better auto-completion when typing in recipients. > > Contacts group feature is more flexible. > > -- > Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) > > > "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:21651B66-CAD6-4C03-8AAF-2B768455934D@xxxxxx Quote: > > The only third party security program I use is Symantec Antivirus 10.2, no > > other application at all, besides Vista own ones. I don't think it looks at > > registry keys. > > > > Is Windows Live Mail better than Windows Mail? If so, why Vista comes with > > Windows Mail and not Windows Live Mail? What's the difference? I'm waiting > > for an Office 2007 DVD to arrive (it's on back order, believe it or not) and > > then I'll have Outlook but I did want Windows Mail to act accordingly. > > > > Thx > > > > > > "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: > > Quote: > >> That setting normally works quite well. > >> Perhaps you are using a third party security program that is preventing > >> changes to the registry, and thereby is blocking WM setting changes > >> from being saved. > >> > >> Incidentally, if you upgrade to Windows Live Mail, it automatically > >> blanks the preview pane for any email judged to be Junk E-Mail. > >> http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview > >> > >> -- > >> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) > >> > >> > >> "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:0DC5633B-FFCC-40D2-8C49-A2937A548191@xxxxxx > >> > In Windows Mail, I have the setting to block images set to on, so, whenever a > >> > message in html format arrives, if it has images and the sender was not set > >> > as trustable yet, it will block the images. > >> > > >> > But, funny side is that the feature seems not to work for the junk emails > >> > which makes no sense at all. All my junk emails, if in html format and with > >> > images, images will be shown despite the setting. > >> > > >> > Am I missing some other setting or this is supposed to be the right although > >> > odd behaviour for Windows Mail? > >> > >> > >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Blocking images from Junk emails To see all of the source code in a message in Windows Mail, including the headers, open the message, then press the Ctrl and F3 keys of your keyboard at the same time. I haven't tried this in the Junk E-mail folder, though, so I'm not sure it works there. "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news 79B47CB-D950-4142-99DE-82BB7E990D6A@xxxxxxQuote: > OK, I'm convinced then that it's a good upgrade. I'll install it. > Thanks. > > About the issue with Windows Mail, now I found that some junk emails have > their pictures blocked, some have not (I deselected, applied and selected > again and applied again the option to make sure Windows Mail get it). My > guess is that for the emails that are not blocked, their pictures are not > linked to a site but rather embeded into the message. I can't still tell > that this is the case because I didn't figure out yet how to read the > source > code of the message in Windows Mail (I am a Vista novice...). > > "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: > Quote: >> Windows Live Mail was released in November of last year, some >> 12 months after Vista was finalized, so you see why it wasn't included. >> Windows Mail was (in my opinion) a stop-gap measure. >> Windows Live Mail does everything Windows Mail does, plus it has >> many additional features: >> >> Able to accommodate Hotmail/MSN accounts. >> >> Real-time spell checker (like in Outlook, it marks typos immediately >> with a red squiggly underline). >> >> Auto-correction of commonly misspelled words (changes 'teh' >> to 'the', and 'i' to 'I'). >> >> Better auto-completion when typing in recipients. >> >> Contacts group feature is more flexible. >> >> -- >> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) >> >> >> "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:21651B66-CAD6-4C03-8AAF-2B768455934D@xxxxxx Quote: >> > The only third party security program I use is Symantec Antivirus 10.2, >> > no >> > other application at all, besides Vista own ones. I don't think it >> > looks at >> > registry keys. >> > >> > Is Windows Live Mail better than Windows Mail? If so, why Vista comes >> > with >> > Windows Mail and not Windows Live Mail? What's the difference? I'm >> > waiting >> > for an Office 2007 DVD to arrive (it's on back order, believe it or >> > not) and >> > then I'll have Outlook but I did want Windows Mail to act accordingly. >> > >> > Thx >> > >> > >> > "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: >> > >> >> That setting normally works quite well. >> >> Perhaps you are using a third party security program that is >> >> preventing >> >> changes to the registry, and thereby is blocking WM setting changes >> >> from being saved. >> >> >> >> Incidentally, if you upgrade to Windows Live Mail, it automatically >> >> blanks the preview pane for any email judged to be Junk E-Mail. >> >> http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) >> >> >> >> >> >> "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> >> news:0DC5633B-FFCC-40D2-8C49-A2937A548191@xxxxxx >> >> > In Windows Mail, I have the setting to block images set to on, so, >> >> > whenever a >> >> > message in html format arrives, if it has images and the sender was >> >> > not set >> >> > as trustable yet, it will block the images. >> >> > >> >> > But, funny side is that the feature seems not to work for the junk >> >> > emails >> >> > which makes no sense at all. All my junk emails, if in html format >> >> > and with >> >> > images, images will be shown despite the setting. >> >> > >> >> > Am I missing some other setting or this is supposed to be the right >> >> > although >> >> > odd behaviour for Windows Mail? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Blocking images from Junk emails CTRL-F2 will show the HTML source code of any open message. CTRL-F3 shows the entire message source, as you indicated. steve <robertmiles@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uB%233E1cmIHA.4536@xxxxxx Quote: > To see all of the source code in a message in Windows Mail, including > the headers, open the message, then press the Ctrl and F3 keys of > your keyboard at the same time. I haven't tried this in the Junk E-mail > folder, though, so I'm not sure it works there. > > "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news 79B47CB-D950-4142-99DE-82BB7E990D6A@xxxxxxQuote: >> OK, I'm convinced then that it's a good upgrade. I'll install it. >> Thanks. >> >> About the issue with Windows Mail, now I found that some junk emails have >> their pictures blocked, some have not (I deselected, applied and selected >> again and applied again the option to make sure Windows Mail get it). My >> guess is that for the emails that are not blocked, their pictures are not >> linked to a site but rather embeded into the message. I can't still tell >> that this is the case because I didn't figure out yet how to read the >> source >> code of the message in Windows Mail (I am a Vista novice...). >> >> "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: >> Quote: >>> Windows Live Mail was released in November of last year, some >>> 12 months after Vista was finalized, so you see why it wasn't included. >>> Windows Mail was (in my opinion) a stop-gap measure. >>> Windows Live Mail does everything Windows Mail does, plus it has >>> many additional features: >>> >>> Able to accommodate Hotmail/MSN accounts. >>> >>> Real-time spell checker (like in Outlook, it marks typos immediately >>> with a red squiggly underline). >>> >>> Auto-correction of commonly misspelled words (changes 'teh' >>> to 'the', and 'i' to 'I'). >>> >>> Better auto-completion when typing in recipients. >>> >>> Contacts group feature is more flexible. >>> >>> -- >>> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) >>> >>> >>> "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message >>> news:21651B66-CAD6-4C03-8AAF-2B768455934D@xxxxxx >>> > The only third party security program I use is Symantec Antivirus >>> > 10.2, no >>> > other application at all, besides Vista own ones. I don't think it >>> > looks at >>> > registry keys. >>> > >>> > Is Windows Live Mail better than Windows Mail? If so, why Vista comes >>> > with >>> > Windows Mail and not Windows Live Mail? What's the difference? I'm >>> > waiting >>> > for an Office 2007 DVD to arrive (it's on back order, believe it or >>> > not) and >>> > then I'll have Outlook but I did want Windows Mail to act accordingly. >>> > >>> > Thx >>> > >>> > >>> > "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: >>> > >>> >> That setting normally works quite well. >>> >> Perhaps you are using a third party security program that is >>> >> preventing >>> >> changes to the registry, and thereby is blocking WM setting changes >>> >> from being saved. >>> >> >>> >> Incidentally, if you upgrade to Windows Live Mail, it automatically >>> >> blanks the preview pane for any email judged to be Junk E-Mail. >>> >> http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message >>> >> news:0DC5633B-FFCC-40D2-8C49-A2937A548191@xxxxxx >>> >> > In Windows Mail, I have the setting to block images set to on, so, >>> >> > whenever a >>> >> > message in html format arrives, if it has images and the sender was >>> >> > not set >>> >> > as trustable yet, it will block the images. >>> >> > >>> >> > But, funny side is that the feature seems not to work for the junk >>> >> > emails >>> >> > which makes no sense at all. All my junk emails, if in html format >>> >> > and with >>> >> > images, images will be shown despite the setting. >>> >> > >>> >> > Am I missing some other setting or this is supposed to be the right >>> >> > although >>> >> > odd behaviour for Windows Mail? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: Blocking images from Junk emails I installed Windows Live Mail (and also Windows Live Gallery) and now I have both Windows Mail and Windows Live Mail in my Programs and also both Windows Gallery and Windows Live Gallery. Wasn't the "Live" version supposed to be an update or upgrade to the "non-Live" versions? Having both versions in the system makes not much of a sense since they are similar, same GUI, same functions, just one has more features than the other. And, for some unknown-to-me reason, IE doesn't allow me to post messages here anymore. When I click Reply, it does nothing. I am using Windows Live Mail to read the newsgroup now. "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news 79B47CB-D950-4142-99DE-82BB7E990D6A@xxxxxxQuote: > OK, I'm convinced then that it's a good upgrade. I'll install it. > Thanks. > > About the issue with Windows Mail, now I found that some junk emails have > their pictures blocked, some have not (I deselected, applied and selected > again and applied again the option to make sure Windows Mail get it). My > guess is that for the emails that are not blocked, their pictures are not > linked to a site but rather embeded into the message. I can't still tell > that this is the case because I didn't figure out yet how to read the > source > code of the message in Windows Mail (I am a Vista novice...). > > "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: > Quote: >> Windows Live Mail was released in November of last year, some >> 12 months after Vista was finalized, so you see why it wasn't included. >> Windows Mail was (in my opinion) a stop-gap measure. >> Windows Live Mail does everything Windows Mail does, plus it has >> many additional features: >> >> Able to accommodate Hotmail/MSN accounts. >> >> Real-time spell checker (like in Outlook, it marks typos immediately >> with a red squiggly underline). >> >> Auto-correction of commonly misspelled words (changes 'teh' >> to 'the', and 'i' to 'I'). >> >> Better auto-completion when typing in recipients. >> >> Contacts group feature is more flexible. >> >> -- >> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) >> >> >> "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:21651B66-CAD6-4C03-8AAF-2B768455934D@xxxxxx Quote: >> > The only third party security program I use is Symantec Antivirus 10.2, >> > no >> > other application at all, besides Vista own ones. I don't think it >> > looks at >> > registry keys. >> > >> > Is Windows Live Mail better than Windows Mail? If so, why Vista comes >> > with >> > Windows Mail and not Windows Live Mail? What's the difference? I'm >> > waiting >> > for an Office 2007 DVD to arrive (it's on back order, believe it or >> > not) and >> > then I'll have Outlook but I did want Windows Mail to act accordingly. >> > >> > Thx >> > >> > >> > "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: >> > >> >> That setting normally works quite well. >> >> Perhaps you are using a third party security program that is >> >> preventing >> >> changes to the registry, and thereby is blocking WM setting changes >> >> from being saved. >> >> >> >> Incidentally, if you upgrade to Windows Live Mail, it automatically >> >> blanks the preview pane for any email judged to be Junk E-Mail. >> >> http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) >> >> >> >> >> >> "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> >> news:0DC5633B-FFCC-40D2-8C49-A2937A548191@xxxxxx >> >> > In Windows Mail, I have the setting to block images set to on, so, >> >> > whenever a >> >> > message in html format arrives, if it has images and the sender was >> >> > not set >> >> > as trustable yet, it will block the images. >> >> > >> >> > But, funny side is that the feature seems not to work for the junk >> >> > emails >> >> > which makes no sense at all. All my junk emails, if in html format >> >> > and with >> >> > images, images will be shown despite the setting. >> >> > >> >> > Am I missing some other setting or this is supposed to be the right >> >> > although >> >> > odd behaviour for Windows Mail? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: Blocking images from Junk emails You can't uninstall Windows Mail. Just let it lie dormant. If WLM ever fouls up on you, you'll have WM to fall back on. WLM is not really an 'upgrade' of WM, although I often call it that in order to promote the seamless way that WLM imports all WM settings, accounts, and emails. -- Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) "Andy" <andre@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:6F18189F-474C-46AE-B8E0-0B7DC74CBA16@xxxxxx Quote: >I installed Windows Live Mail (and also Windows Live Gallery) and now I have both Windows Mail and Windows Live Mail in my >Programs and also both Windows Gallery and Windows Live Gallery. > > Wasn't the "Live" version supposed to be an update or upgrade to the "non-Live" versions? Having both versions in the system > makes not much of a sense since they are similar, same GUI, same functions, just one has more features than the other. > > And, for some unknown-to-me reason, IE doesn't allow me to post messages here anymore. When I click Reply, it does nothing. I > am using Windows Live Mail to read the newsgroup now. > > > "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news 79B47CB-D950-4142-99DE-82BB7E990D6A@xxxxxxQuote: >> OK, I'm convinced then that it's a good upgrade. I'll install it. Thanks. >> >> About the issue with Windows Mail, now I found that some junk emails have >> their pictures blocked, some have not (I deselected, applied and selected >> again and applied again the option to make sure Windows Mail get it). My >> guess is that for the emails that are not blocked, their pictures are not >> linked to a site but rather embeded into the message. I can't still tell >> that this is the case because I didn't figure out yet how to read the source >> code of the message in Windows Mail (I am a Vista novice...). >> >> "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: >> Quote: >>> Windows Live Mail was released in November of last year, some >>> 12 months after Vista was finalized, so you see why it wasn't included. >>> Windows Mail was (in my opinion) a stop-gap measure. >>> Windows Live Mail does everything Windows Mail does, plus it has >>> many additional features: >>> >>> Able to accommodate Hotmail/MSN accounts. >>> >>> Real-time spell checker (like in Outlook, it marks typos immediately >>> with a red squiggly underline). >>> >>> Auto-correction of commonly misspelled words (changes 'teh' >>> to 'the', and 'i' to 'I'). >>> >>> Better auto-completion when typing in recipients. >>> >>> Contacts group feature is more flexible. >>> >>> -- >>> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) >>> >>> >>> "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:21651B66-CAD6-4C03-8AAF-2B768455934D@xxxxxx >>> > The only third party security program I use is Symantec Antivirus 10.2, no >>> > other application at all, besides Vista own ones. I don't think it looks at >>> > registry keys. >>> > >>> > Is Windows Live Mail better than Windows Mail? If so, why Vista comes with >>> > Windows Mail and not Windows Live Mail? What's the difference? I'm waiting >>> > for an Office 2007 DVD to arrive (it's on back order, believe it or not) and >>> > then I'll have Outlook but I did want Windows Mail to act accordingly. >>> > >>> > Thx >>> > >>> > >>> > "Gary VanderMolen" wrote: >>> > >>> >> That setting normally works quite well. >>> >> Perhaps you are using a third party security program that is preventing >>> >> changes to the registry, and thereby is blocking WM setting changes >>> >> from being saved. >>> >> >>> >> Incidentally, if you upgrade to Windows Live Mail, it automatically >>> >> blanks the preview pane for any email judged to be Junk E-Mail. >>> >> http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> "Andy" <Andy@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:0DC5633B-FFCC-40D2-8C49-A2937A548191@xxxxxx >>> >> > In Windows Mail, I have the setting to block images set to on, so, whenever a >>> >> > message in html format arrives, if it has images and the sender was not set >>> >> > as trustable yet, it will block the images. >>> >> > >>> >> > But, funny side is that the feature seems not to work for the junk emails >>> >> > which makes no sense at all. All my junk emails, if in html format and with >>> >> > images, images will be shown despite the setting. >>> >> > >>> >> > Am I missing some other setting or this is supposed to be the right although >>> >> > odd behaviour for Windows Mail? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Re. Blocking junk mails. | Live Mail | |||
| Blocking emails | Vista mail | |||
| blocking junk email | Vista mail | |||
| Blocking multiple junk emails | Vista mail | |||
| why is parental controls blocking all jpeg images | Vista account administration | |||