![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Photo Gallery Pictures are Horrible I just bought my first Vista PC, and I have noticed that pictures (JPEGs) viewed through Photo Gallery are horrible. When using Photoshop, Adobe Bridge, or Adobe Lightroom, the pictures look normal and good. However, with Photo Gallery, pictures tend to be darker, especially for the darks (shadows) in the pictures. People's hair in particular usually has very poor rendering. Parts of hair are completely black...there is absolutely no detail. Pictures with dark backgrounds (e.g., pictures taken of people, using a flash) render the background almost completely black in many areas. In most of these cases, dark hair blends completely into the dark background.....both the hair and background are completely black. This is very annoying. While I use Adobe products to edit my pictures, I like to use "quick" programs like Windows Pictures and Fax Viewer to run through my pictures to view. It also raises the concern that what if people I send pictures to use Photo Gallery? I'm sure it's some sort of color management issue, but users shouldn't have to fiddle with this, especially with a computer right out of the box! I'd greatly appreciate any suggestions....thanks, Richard |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Photo Gallery Pictures are Horrible Richard1962 wrote: Quote: > I just bought my first Vista PC, and I have noticed that pictures > (JPEGs) viewed through Photo Gallery are horrible. When using > Photoshop, Adobe Bridge, or Adobe Lightroom, the pictures look normal > and good. However, with Photo Gallery, pictures tend to be darker, > especially for the darks (shadows) in the pictures. People's hair in > particular usually has very poor rendering. Parts of hair are > completely black...there is absolutely no detail. Pictures with dark > backgrounds (e.g., pictures taken of people, using a flash) render > the background almost completely black in many areas. In most of > these cases, dark hair blends completely into the dark > background.....both the hair and background are completely black. > This is very annoying. While I use Adobe products to edit my > pictures, I like to use "quick" programs like Windows Pictures and > Fax Viewer to run through my pictures to view. It also raises the > concern that what if people I send pictures to use Photo Gallery? > I'm sure it's some sort of color management issue, but users > shouldn't have to fiddle with this, especially with a computer right > out of the box! > I'd greatly appreciate any suggestions....thanks, Richard Have a look at the following articles: (939395) When you view an image in Windows Photo Gallery on a Windows Vista-based computer, the image is yellow http://support.microsoft.com/kb/939395/en-us Microsoft PhotoBlog Frequently Asked Questions: http://blogs.msdn.com/pix/pages/faq.aspx#q6 Read: "Q: Why do my photos have an odd color cast in the Photo Gallery (but look fine in the XP Picture and Fax Viewer and IE)?" Yellow pictures in Windows Photo Gallery http://tinyurl.com/33gxum or... Yellow pictures in Windows Photo Gallery -- John Inzer |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Photo Gallery Pictures are Horrible Thanks, John. Got to run, now, but I'll look at those articles in more detail tonight. I will say, however, that I wouldn't characterize my problem as a yellow tinge or sepia tone. I did quickly check what color profile is being loaded at startup, and it is the one that came from Dell for my 24" widescreen monitor. I guess one thing I need to look into is if any of the articles above work, why do pictures look fine, viewing with Photoshop CS3, Bridge, or Elements, even after booting up with that Dell color profile? I can bring up pictures with any of these Adobe products side by side with the same pictures viewed with Photo Gallery, and there is a marked difference. Anyway, thanks again....I'll investigate further tonight. Richard "John Inzer" wrote: Quote: > Richard1962 wrote: Quote: > > I just bought my first Vista PC, and I have noticed that pictures > > (JPEGs) viewed through Photo Gallery are horrible. When using > > Photoshop, Adobe Bridge, or Adobe Lightroom, the pictures look normal > > and good. However, with Photo Gallery, pictures tend to be darker, > > especially for the darks (shadows) in the pictures. People's hair in > > particular usually has very poor rendering. Parts of hair are > > completely black...there is absolutely no detail. Pictures with dark > > backgrounds (e.g., pictures taken of people, using a flash) render > > the background almost completely black in many areas. In most of > > these cases, dark hair blends completely into the dark > > background.....both the hair and background are completely black. > > This is very annoying. While I use Adobe products to edit my > > pictures, I like to use "quick" programs like Windows Pictures and > > Fax Viewer to run through my pictures to view. It also raises the > > concern that what if people I send pictures to use Photo Gallery? > > I'm sure it's some sort of color management issue, but users > > shouldn't have to fiddle with this, especially with a computer right > > out of the box! > > I'd greatly appreciate any suggestions....thanks, Richard > Have a look at the following articles: > > (939395) When you view an image in Windows > Photo Gallery on a Windows Vista-based computer, > the image is yellow > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/939395/en-us > > Microsoft PhotoBlog Frequently Asked Questions: > http://blogs.msdn.com/pix/pages/faq.aspx#q6 > Read: "Q: Why do my photos have an odd color > cast in the Photo Gallery (but look fine in the XP > Picture and Fax Viewer and IE)?" > > Yellow pictures in Windows Photo Gallery > http://tinyurl.com/33gxum > or... > Yellow pictures in Windows Photo Gallery > > > -- > > John Inzer > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Photo Gallery Pictures are Horrible Richard1962 wrote: Quote: > Thanks, John. > > Got to run, now, but I'll look at those articles in more detail > tonight. I will say, however, that I wouldn't characterize my > problem as a yellow tinge or sepia tone. I did quickly check what > color profile is being loaded at startup, and it is the one that came > from Dell for my 24" widescreen monitor. > > > I guess one thing I need to look into is if any of the articles above > work, why do pictures look fine, viewing with Photoshop CS3, Bridge, > or Elements, even after booting up with that Dell color profile? I > can bring up pictures with any of these Adobe products side by side > with the same pictures viewed with Photo Gallery, and there is a > marked difference. > > Anyway, thanks again....I'll investigate further tonight. > > Richard My bet is still on the color profile. Let us know if you find a fix. -- John Inzer |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Photo Gallery Pictures are Horrible John, Something came up, and I haven't been able to delve into this problem this past few weeks, but I'll get back to checking it in the coming days. Richard "John Inzer" wrote: Quote: > Richard1962 wrote: Quote: > > Thanks, John. > > > > Got to run, now, but I'll look at those articles in more detail > > tonight. I will say, however, that I wouldn't characterize my > > problem as a yellow tinge or sepia tone. I did quickly check what > > color profile is being loaded at startup, and it is the one that came > > from Dell for my 24" widescreen monitor. > > > > > > I guess one thing I need to look into is if any of the articles above > > work, why do pictures look fine, viewing with Photoshop CS3, Bridge, > > or Elements, even after booting up with that Dell color profile? I > > can bring up pictures with any of these Adobe products side by side > > with the same pictures viewed with Photo Gallery, and there is a > > marked difference. > > > > Anyway, thanks again....I'll investigate further tonight. > > > > Richard > My bet is still on the color profile. > > Let us know if you find a fix. > > -- > > John Inzer > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Photo Gallery Pictures are Horrible Hi, John. Changing the color profile appears to fix the problem....note that I think I had to reboot in order for the color profile changes to take place. I also tried using Adobe RGB 1998, which is what I usually shoot with, and that seems to work as well. Thanks a lot for your help! Richard "John Inzer" wrote: Quote: > Richard1962 wrote: Quote: > > Thanks, John. > > > > Got to run, now, but I'll look at those articles in more detail > > tonight. I will say, however, that I wouldn't characterize my > > problem as a yellow tinge or sepia tone. I did quickly check what > > color profile is being loaded at startup, and it is the one that came > > from Dell for my 24" widescreen monitor. > > > > > > I guess one thing I need to look into is if any of the articles above > > work, why do pictures look fine, viewing with Photoshop CS3, Bridge, > > or Elements, even after booting up with that Dell color profile? I > > can bring up pictures with any of these Adobe products side by side > > with the same pictures viewed with Photo Gallery, and there is a > > marked difference. > > > > Anyway, thanks again....I'll investigate further tonight. > > > > Richard > My bet is still on the color profile. > > Let us know if you find a fix. > > -- > > John Inzer > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Photo Gallery Pictures are Horrible Richard1962 wrote: Quote: > Hi, John. > > Changing the color profile appears to fix the problem....note that I > think I had to reboot in order for the color profile changes to take > place. I also tried using > Adobe RGB 1998, which is what I usually shoot with, and that seems to > work as well. > > Thanks a lot for your help! > > Richard You're welcome. Thanks for the update. -- John Inzer Digital Media MVP Notice This is not tech support I am a volunteer Solutions that work for me may not work for you Proceed at your own risk |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Photo Gallery Pictures are Horrible John, After looking at many pictures this evening, I've noticed something else. Although I think I have fixed my original problem, it appears as if a similar problem occurs when I run the slideshow part of Photo Gallery. Before I get into the slide show part, one thing I started noticing is that if I convert the color space to Adobe RGB 1998, things look better than using sRGB. This is especially true in the dark areas. This is understandable because Adobe RGB 1998, which I usually take pictures in, has a wider color gamut (can see more colors) than sRGB can. I just never noticed this on my laptop running XP and Windows Picture and Fax Viewer, but it also could be because I also bought a nice monitor with my new PC which has a wide color gamut. To be honest, however, I don't think this is because my new monitor is better....I would think that even with sRGB, pictures should still be better than the older machine. Now, about the slide show. It's a little harder to tell because I can't as quickly switch back and forth between pictures using different programs because of the slide show running, but there is some noticeable difference. Again, the shadows or dark areas don't have as much contrast; they seem to be oversaturated when the slide show is running, as compared to just looking at individual pictures. Pictures also do not look as sharp using the slideshow as compared to individual pictures in Photo Gallery. This is especially noticeable in people's hair. My suspicion is that Photo Gallery's slide show does something to the pictures like perhaps using sRGB, even if my default profile is Adobe RGB 1998; I suspect it might be lowering the resolution or changing the sharpness somehow. Have you seen or heard of this particular problem with the slide show portion of Photo Gallery? Again, I never noticed this on my laptop with XP and Windows Picture and Fax Viewer. I really do not think the problem exists on my laptop with XP. Thanks, Richard "John Inzer" wrote: Quote: > Richard1962 wrote: Quote: > > Hi, John. > > > > Changing the color profile appears to fix the problem....note that I > > think I had to reboot in order for the color profile changes to take > > place. I also tried using > > Adobe RGB 1998, which is what I usually shoot with, and that seems to > > work as well. > > > > Thanks a lot for your help! > > > > Richard > You're welcome. > > Thanks for the update. > > -- > > John Inzer > Digital Media MVP > > Notice > This is not tech support > I am a volunteer > > Solutions that work for > me may not work for you > > Proceed at your own risk > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: Photo Gallery Pictures are Horrible I would suggest removing all the Color Profiles and see how things look. -- John Inzer Digital Media MVP Notice This is not tech support I am a volunteer Solutions that work for me may not work for you Proceed at your own risk ====================== Richard1962 wrote: Quote: > John, > > After looking at many pictures this evening, I've noticed something > else. Although I think I have fixed my original problem, it appears > as if a similar problem occurs when I run the slideshow part of Photo > Gallery. > > Before I get into the slide show part, one thing I started noticing > is that if I convert the color space to Adobe RGB 1998, things look > better than using sRGB. This is especially true in the dark areas. > This is understandable because Adobe RGB 1998, which I usually take > pictures in, has a wider color gamut (can see more colors) than sRGB > can. I just never noticed this on my laptop running XP and Windows > Picture and Fax Viewer, but it also could be because I also bought a > nice monitor with my new PC which has a wide color gamut. To be > honest, however, I don't think this is because my new monitor is > better....I would think that even with sRGB, pictures should still be > better than the older machine. > > Now, about the slide show. It's a little harder to tell because I > can't as quickly switch back and forth between pictures using > different programs because of the slide show running, but there is > some noticeable difference. Again, the shadows or dark areas don't > have as much contrast; they seem to be oversaturated when the slide > show is running, as compared to just looking at individual pictures. > Pictures also do not look as sharp using the slideshow as compared to > individual pictures in Photo Gallery. This is especially noticeable > in people's hair. > > My suspicion is that Photo Gallery's slide show does something to the > pictures like perhaps using sRGB, even if my default profile is Adobe > RGB 1998; I suspect it might be lowering the resolution or changing > the sharpness somehow. > > Have you seen or heard of this particular problem with the slide show > portion of Photo Gallery? Again, I never noticed this on my laptop > with XP and Windows Picture and Fax Viewer. I really do not think > the problem exists on my laptop with XP. > > Thanks, > > Richard |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: Photo Gallery Pictures are Horrible John, I've removed both color profiles. As default, I had Adobe RGB 1998. The 2nd one was the profile for my Dell 24" monitor. After removing both and rebooting, I still see that problem with the slideshow in Photo Gallery. However, the more I have looked at it, the more I think it is a sharpening or perhaps a much lower resolution issue. Again, what I see in the slide show is a picture that is without a doubt less sharp than what I see if I just double click on a single picture. This is particularly noticeable in a person's hair, but I can also see it in their faces and other places. One picture I have is of a friend in the foreground. In the background, which is dark, there are 2 people sitting in a booth in a restaurant. My friend's face and particularly his hair is noticeably less sharp in the slide show. In the slide show, those 2 people in the dark background are harder to make out than they are when I just double click on that picture. Another thing I have noticed is that in the slide show, some pictures, not all, show a very thin and rainbow colored border, typically on the top and the left edges of the picture, in the slideshow. That border is about the width of a pencil line. Don't know, and doubt, if this is related. Richard "John Inzer" wrote: Quote: > I would suggest removing all the Color > Profiles and see how things look. > > -- > > John Inzer > Digital Media MVP > > Notice > This is not tech support > I am a volunteer > > Solutions that work for > me may not work for you > > Proceed at your own risk > ====================== > Richard1962 wrote: Quote: > > John, > > > > After looking at many pictures this evening, I've noticed something > > else. Although I think I have fixed my original problem, it appears > > as if a similar problem occurs when I run the slideshow part of Photo > > Gallery. > > > > Before I get into the slide show part, one thing I started noticing > > is that if I convert the color space to Adobe RGB 1998, things look > > better than using sRGB. This is especially true in the dark areas. > > This is understandable because Adobe RGB 1998, which I usually take > > pictures in, has a wider color gamut (can see more colors) than sRGB > > can. I just never noticed this on my laptop running XP and Windows > > Picture and Fax Viewer, but it also could be because I also bought a > > nice monitor with my new PC which has a wide color gamut. To be > > honest, however, I don't think this is because my new monitor is > > better....I would think that even with sRGB, pictures should still be > > better than the older machine. > > > > Now, about the slide show. It's a little harder to tell because I > > can't as quickly switch back and forth between pictures using > > different programs because of the slide show running, but there is > > some noticeable difference. Again, the shadows or dark areas don't > > have as much contrast; they seem to be oversaturated when the slide > > show is running, as compared to just looking at individual pictures. > > Pictures also do not look as sharp using the slideshow as compared to > > individual pictures in Photo Gallery. This is especially noticeable > > in people's hair. > > > > My suspicion is that Photo Gallery's slide show does something to the > > pictures like perhaps using sRGB, even if my default profile is Adobe > > RGB 1998; I suspect it might be lowering the resolution or changing > > the sharpness somehow. > > > > Have you seen or heard of this particular problem with the slide show > > portion of Photo Gallery? Again, I never noticed this on my laptop > > with XP and Windows Picture and Fax Viewer. I really do not think > > the problem exists on my laptop with XP. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Richard > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Can't get pictures into Win Photo Gallery | Vista music pictures video | |||
| Photo Gallery & My Pictures | Vista music pictures video | |||
| Photo Gallery won't open pictures | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Pictures are tan/cream in Photo Gallery | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Opening pictures in Photo Gallery | Vista music pictures video | |||