|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
 |
| |
08-04-2008
| #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | CD ripping? I posted this question in the general section before I noticed there was a section for music. I received a less than stellar reply, so I though I would try the same question here. I want to rip dozen's of CD's to a file format with the best quality and least amount of hard disk space taken up. Which should I choose, mp3 (128 kbps), wma (128 kbps) or wma pro at (128 kbps)? Any help would greatly be appreciated along with an explanation as to why a certain choice would be better than the other. Thanks in advance. |
My System Specs |
|
08-04-2008
| #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | RE: CD ripping? Hi Mark, I rip at 128 kbps in wma format for my two pocket size "mp3" players. 128 kbps is fine for mp3 players. I choose wma format in case I want to use the music in a Windows application such as windows movie maker or windows dvd maker/slide show. Wma format always works in these Windows applications. Recently I had trouble using mp3 format in WMM and Wdvdmaker because of a codec conflict from a 3rd party application. Until poster Zach had helped me clear up that problem I used wma audio files as a workaround. The final decision is yours. Try ripping at a few different rates and formats and decide which format sounds best to you. -- oscar  ....Right click is your good friend... "Mark Bohlsen" wrote: Quote: > I posted this question in the general section before I noticed there was a > section for music. I received a less than stellar reply, so I though I would > try the same question here. > > I want to rip dozen's of CD's to a file format with the best quality and > least amount of hard disk space taken up. Which should I choose, mp3 > (128 kbps), wma (128 kbps) or wma pro at (128 kbps)? Any help would greatly > be appreciated along with an explanation as to why a certain choice would be > better than the other. Thanks in advance. > |
| My System Specs |
|
08-05-2008
| #3 (permalink) |
| Guest | RE: CD ripping? Thank you for the reply. I ripped all my cd's with wma 128 and most sound pretty good. I found this link, but for the life of me I can't tell the difference. Thanks again for the honest and complete response. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/win...userlocale=409 "oscar" wrote: Quote: > Hi Mark, > > I rip at 128 kbps in wma format for my two pocket size "mp3" players. 128 > kbps is fine for mp3 players. > > I choose wma format in case I want to use the music in a Windows application > such as windows movie maker or windows dvd maker/slide show. Wma format > always works in these Windows applications. Recently I had trouble using mp3 > format in WMM and Wdvdmaker because of a codec conflict from a 3rd party > application. Until poster Zach had helped me clear up that problem I used wma > audio files as a workaround. > > The final decision is yours. Try ripping at a few different rates and > formats and decide which format sounds best to you. > > > -- > oscar > > ...Right click is your good friend... > > > "Mark Bohlsen" wrote: > Quote: > > I posted this question in the general section before I noticed there was a > > section for music. I received a less than stellar reply, so I though I would > > try the same question here. > > > > I want to rip dozen's of CD's to a file format with the best quality and > > least amount of hard disk space taken up. Which should I choose, mp3 > > (128 kbps), wma (128 kbps) or wma pro at (128 kbps)? Any help would greatly > > be appreciated along with an explanation as to why a certain choice would be > > better than the other. Thanks in advance. > > |
| My System Specs |
|
08-05-2008
| #4 (permalink) |
| Guest | RE: CD ripping? You're welcome. -- oscar ....Right click is your best friend... "Mark Bohlsen" wrote: Quote: > Thank you for the reply. I ripped all my cd's with wma 128 and most sound > pretty good. I found this link, but for the life of me I can't tell the > difference. Thanks again for the honest and complete response. > > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/win...userlocale=409 > > > > "oscar" wrote: > Quote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > I rip at 128 kbps in wma format for my two pocket size "mp3" players. 128 > > kbps is fine for mp3 players. > > > > I choose wma format in case I want to use the music in a Windows application > > such as windows movie maker or windows dvd maker/slide show. Wma format > > always works in these Windows applications. Recently I had trouble using mp3 > > format in WMM and Wdvdmaker because of a codec conflict from a 3rd party > > application. Until poster Zach had helped me clear up that problem I used wma > > audio files as a workaround. > > > > The final decision is yours. Try ripping at a few different rates and > > formats and decide which format sounds best to you. > > > > > > -- > > oscar > > > > ...Right click is your good friend... > > > > > > "Mark Bohlsen" wrote: > > Quote: > > > I posted this question in the general section before I noticed there was a > > > section for music. I received a less than stellar reply, so I though I would > > > try the same question here. > > > > > > I want to rip dozen's of CD's to a file format with the best quality and > > > least amount of hard disk space taken up. Which should I choose, mp3 > > > (128 kbps), wma (128 kbps) or wma pro at (128 kbps)? Any help would greatly > > > be appreciated along with an explanation as to why a certain choice would be > > > better than the other. Thanks in advance. > > > |
| My System Specs |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| DVD ripping | Software | |||
| WMP - Ripping CDs | Vista music pictures video | |||
| Ripping CDs | Vista hardware & devices | |||
| Ripping | Vista music pictures video | |||
| ripping from a mp3 cd | Vista music pictures video | |||
