![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | New interest in x264 codec, YT, WMM I'm not a computer guru: I'm a 45 y.o. classical musician. be gentle. I took to Youtube, and have films on and off the site. The quality is generally bad, despite having a pretty good Sony Handycam 400, MiniDVD (I now know DV is better for editing, but I needed an external mic option). I bought Roxio 10 over a year ago: it is largely a trashy program for editing. makes sloppy mistakes, and is rough with the Sony miniDVDs. So I turned to Windows Movie Maker. A decent program, for a free one. But the results are all trash - no matter how you render it. Until now. I searched YT for ideas, and people are adding post-fixes on the film urls to make them higher quality. ex.gratis: &fmt=18 And another maker said H.264 (or X264) was the best, above divX or XVid - and his video proved it. (DerekforPresident) on YT. I tried to download the file: I did what he said. My computer would not let me drag the X 264 file into my configuration area in the VirtualXDubMod. I use Vista SP1, and my wmm version says it is 6.0.6000.16386. My notebook is an HP, 4GB/250. Brand new. I wonder if I need to remove my WMM altogether, and replace it. I don't see how to get the x264 codec integrated into my wmm. has anyone any witty advice? thanks. -- Sylvester Wager ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sylvester Wager's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/sylvester-wager.htm View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/vista-mus...eo/1114997.htm http://forums.techarena.in |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: New interest in x264 codec, YT, WMM Removing WMM would have no impact on other encoding applications, and would be extraneous to making any progress. I'm unaware of any ability to plug in third party AVI codecs to WMM. AVI has kind of become a morass, and most MS apps don't treat it as a primary format at this point. If 'your favorite tool' encodes to x264-in-AVI, sounds like you're good. =) -- Speaking for myself only. See http://zachd.com/pss/pss.html for some helpful WMP info. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. -- "Sylvester Wager" <Sylvester.Wager.3n1wbb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:Sylvester.Wager.3n1wbb@xxxxxx Quote: > > I'm not a computer guru: I'm a 45 y.o. classical musician. be gentle. > > I took to Youtube, and have films on and off the site. The quality > is generally bad, despite having a pretty good Sony Handycam 400, > MiniDVD (I now know DV is better for editing, but I needed an external > mic option). > > I bought Roxio 10 over a year ago: it is largely a trashy program > for editing. makes sloppy mistakes, and is rough with the Sony > miniDVDs. > > So I turned to Windows Movie Maker. A decent program, for a free > one. But the results are all trash - no matter how you render it. > Until now. I searched YT for ideas, and people are adding post-fixes > on the film urls to make them higher quality. ex.gratis: &fmt=18 > > And another maker said H.264 (or X264) was the best, above divX or > XVid - and his video proved it. (DerekforPresident) on YT. > I tried to download the file: I did what he said. My computer would > not let me drag the X 264 file into my configuration area in the > VirtualXDubMod. > > I use Vista SP1, and my wmm version says it is 6.0.6000.16386. > My notebook is an HP, 4GB/250. Brand new. > > I wonder if I need to remove my WMM altogether, and replace it. > I don't see how to get the x264 codec integrated into my wmm. > > has anyone any witty advice? > thanks. > > > -- > Sylvester Wager > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Sylvester Wager's Profile: > http://forums.techarena.in/members/sylvester-wager.htm > View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/vista-mus...eo/1114997.htm > > http://forums.techarena.in > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: New interest in x264 codec, YT, WMM On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 02:29:05 +0530, Sylvester Wager <Sylvester.Wager.3n1wbb@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > >I'm not a computer guru: I'm a 45 y.o. classical musician. be gentle. starters spent a few minutes and Goggle "how to encode for you YouTube" and you'll find plenty of web sites. One such site is below: http://webvideotechniques.com/35/how...quality-option I've used the mentioned super video encoder mentioned with good results. The critical issues, actually two are frame size and bitrate. The first is the physical size of video or how much space it occupies on the screen. If you don't follow the "rules" it will get recompressed. The more recompressed your video is the worse it will look. Several codecs have been developed for web use that allow higher compression (makes the file size smaller) without severely effecting video quality. So my suggestion, use Movie Maker to edit your video, then save in a file format super video encoder or some similar application uses then encode with that and you end up with better quality. Avoid saving at "HD" or other higher quality settings, since all that does is bloat file size and force it to get recompressed which is what kills quality. For YouTube and most public video archives on the web the expected frame size is just 320x240 for standard video and slightly larger for wide screen. Use as high as bitrate as possible while keeping under the maximum file size and your videos will look better than the average crap on YouTube. One simple thing you may also want to do is bump up Contrast and slightly reduce brightness. This can help hide artifacts. Also avoid using too low a frame rate. Many YouTube vids are from cheap web cams and it shows as jerky playback. Your vid should have a frame rate between 20-30 frames a second. Depending on which tools you use you may or may not be able to adjust this. For web vids, if you can a lessor frame rate usually works fine and gives you more space in the file's size to increase either bitrate or length of the vid. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| XviD/x264 encoding | Software | |||
| PLEASE HELP with choppy 1080p mkv h264/x264 on new rig!!! | Media Center | |||
| Of interest | Vista General | |||
| Vista x64 x264 encoding | Software | |||
| May be of Interest to some of you | Vista General | |||