![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Photo Gallery (WPG) - appalling display quality I just tried opening my custom wallpaper picture in Paint, saved it as a new file, and opened it in Photo Gallery.... and they all look the same. -- website references are to www.papajohn.org PapaJohn "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:A292B8D6-65E1-4047-8B44-AA8C6E2C5DFA@microsoft.com... > There you go, guys... sorry about the triple posting... > > Original Pic: > http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/189/errorla7.jpg > > as wallapaper/WPG/Paint: > http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/6475/errorvt6.jpg > > See what i mean? Anybody can correct this so far? > > Microsoft should fix this ASAP as WPG is the program i used to use all the > time with XP ![]() > > Thank you............ > > "Redbeaver" wrote: > >> DARN!! i uploaded the wrong picture... i will upload another one at >> home.... >> sorry, guys... im at the office now... >> >> Ah yes, and i forgot to mention, and since i couldnt find the edit >> button, >> here goes: >> >> My system: >> AMD X2 3800+ >> 2Gb RAM >> 2x7900GT on SLI using Forceware 97.46 >> Samsung 205BW >> Vista Ultimate OEM >> >> Thanks! |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Photo Gallery (WPG) - appalling display quality Nope... didnt help ![]() My original format was BMP, saved it as JPG from Paint, closed paint, reopen, and it shows the same colour. then i doubleclick (automatically opened with WPG), and it still shows the darker-tone version like my link above... but thanks though ![]() "PapaJohn" wrote: > I just tried opening my custom wallpaper picture in Paint, saved it as a new > file, and opened it in Photo Gallery.... and they all look the same. > -- > website references are to www.papajohn.org > > PapaJohn > > "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:A292B8D6-65E1-4047-8B44-AA8C6E2C5DFA@microsoft.com... > > There you go, guys... sorry about the triple posting... > > > > Original Pic: > > http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/189/errorla7.jpg > > > > as wallapaper/WPG/Paint: > > http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/6475/errorvt6.jpg > > > > See what i mean? Anybody can correct this so far? > > > > Microsoft should fix this ASAP as WPG is the program i used to use all the > > time with XP ![]() > > > > Thank you............ > > > > "Redbeaver" wrote: > > > >> DARN!! i uploaded the wrong picture... i will upload another one at > >> home.... > >> sorry, guys... im at the office now... > >> > >> Ah yes, and i forgot to mention, and since i couldnt find the edit > >> button, > >> here goes: > >> > >> My system: > >> AMD X2 3800+ > >> 2Gb RAM > >> 2x7900GT on SLI using Forceware 97.46 > >> Samsung 205BW > >> Vista Ultimate OEM > >> > >> Thanks! > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Photo Gallery (WPG) - appalling display quality Redbeaver, I opened your image in Vista Windows Photo Gallery and then again in Exlorer AND Photoshop and you can CLEARLY see the poor image quality in W.Photo Gallery! In Windows Photo Gallery: 1. The image is much darker than the photoshop (reference and color monitored image) 2. The image exhibits obvious pixelation in the clouds in the center and center right of the image 3. The image looks artificially saturated beyond the reference image in Photoshop (which is an ICC color aware environment). Everyone I've spoken to who now has Vista has noticed this problem. To the novice , the problem may not be apparent at first. However, to the photographer and just about anyone else who is color aware, can see this problem. I really wish Microsoft will address this as soon as possible. Meanwhile, I have switched to Google's Picasa as my picture photo gallery (to manage images) and it totally ROCKS. I encouraged those frustrated by this Vista Windows Photo Gallery problem, to try out Picasa - I think you will like it. -Michael " > > "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:A292B8D6-65E1-4047-8B44-AA8C6E2C5DFA@microsoft.com... > > There you go, guys... sorry about the triple posting... > > > > Original Pic: > > http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/189/errorla7.jpg > > > > as wallapaper/WPG/Paint: > > http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/6475/errorvt6.jpg > > > > See what i mean? Anybody can correct this so far? > > > > Microsoft should fix this ASAP as WPG is the program i used to use all the > > time with XP ![]() > > > > Thank you............ > > > > "Redbeaver" wrote: > > > >> DARN!! i uploaded the wrong picture... i will upload another one at > >> home.... > >> sorry, guys... im at the office now... > >> > >> Ah yes, and i forgot to mention, and since i couldnt find the edit > >> button, > >> here goes: > >> > >> My system: > >> AMD X2 3800+ > >> 2Gb RAM > >> 2x7900GT on SLI using Forceware 97.46 > >> Samsung 205BW > >> Vista Ultimate OEM > >> > >> Thanks! > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Photo Gallery (WPG) - appalling display quality That's why I love free markets. The more non-Microsoft solutions there are to problems with Vista, the more Microsoft will learn to listen to its true customers over and above its partners. Dale "Michael J" <MichaelJ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:854D98CF-E011-4620-A9F7-D59BD6C84261@microsoft.com... > Redbeaver, > > I opened your image in Vista Windows Photo Gallery and then again in > Exlorer > AND Photoshop and you can CLEARLY see the poor image quality in W.Photo > Gallery! > > In Windows Photo Gallery: > 1. The image is much darker than the photoshop (reference and color > monitored image) > 2. The image exhibits obvious pixelation in the clouds in the center and > center right of the image > 3. The image looks artificially saturated beyond the reference image in > Photoshop (which is an ICC color aware environment). > > Everyone I've spoken to who now has Vista has noticed this problem. To the > novice , the problem may not be apparent at first. However, to the > photographer and just about anyone else who is color aware, can see this > problem. I really wish Microsoft will address this as soon as possible. > Meanwhile, I have switched to Google's Picasa as my picture photo gallery > (to > manage images) and it totally ROCKS. I encouraged those frustrated by this > Vista Windows Photo Gallery problem, to try out Picasa - I think you will > like it. > > -Michael > > " >> >> "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:A292B8D6-65E1-4047-8B44-AA8C6E2C5DFA@microsoft.com... >> > There you go, guys... sorry about the triple posting... >> > >> > Original Pic: >> > http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/189/errorla7.jpg >> > >> > as wallapaper/WPG/Paint: >> > http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/6475/errorvt6.jpg >> > >> > See what i mean? Anybody can correct this so far? >> > >> > Microsoft should fix this ASAP as WPG is the program i used to use all >> > the >> > time with XP ![]() >> > >> > Thank you............ >> > >> > "Redbeaver" wrote: >> > >> >> DARN!! i uploaded the wrong picture... i will upload another one at >> >> home.... >> >> sorry, guys... im at the office now... >> >> >> >> Ah yes, and i forgot to mention, and since i couldnt find the edit >> >> button, >> >> here goes: >> >> >> >> My system: >> >> AMD X2 3800+ >> >> 2Gb RAM >> >> 2x7900GT on SLI using Forceware 97.46 >> >> Samsung 205BW >> >> Vista Ultimate OEM >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Photo Gallery (WPG) - appalling display quality Hi Mike, Thanks for the reply. Good to see I'm not alone in this boat ![]() Yeah, I just installed Photoshop CS2 now, and I couldnt do anything about the ICC profile. PS noted that the profile isn't right, so I chose 'Do Not Use' instead of 'Use Anyway'. But then it shows nicely, unlike WPG. Yeah, thats why I posted here so hopefully MS can do something about this. Regards, Dave "Michael J" wrote: > Redbeaver, > > I opened your image in Vista Windows Photo Gallery and then again in Exlorer > AND Photoshop and you can CLEARLY see the poor image quality in W.Photo > Gallery! > > In Windows Photo Gallery: > 1. The image is much darker than the photoshop (reference and color > monitored image) > 2. The image exhibits obvious pixelation in the clouds in the center and > center right of the image > 3. The image looks artificially saturated beyond the reference image in > Photoshop (which is an ICC color aware environment). > > Everyone I've spoken to who now has Vista has noticed this problem. To the > novice , the problem may not be apparent at first. However, to the > photographer and just about anyone else who is color aware, can see this > problem. I really wish Microsoft will address this as soon as possible. > Meanwhile, I have switched to Google's Picasa as my picture photo gallery (to > manage images) and it totally ROCKS. I encouraged those frustrated by this > Vista Windows Photo Gallery problem, to try out Picasa - I think you will > like it. > > -Michael > > " > > > > "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:A292B8D6-65E1-4047-8B44-AA8C6E2C5DFA@microsoft.com... > > > There you go, guys... sorry about the triple posting... > > > > > > Original Pic: > > > http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/189/errorla7.jpg > > > > > > as wallapaper/WPG/Paint: > > > http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/6475/errorvt6.jpg > > > > > > See what i mean? Anybody can correct this so far? > > > > > > Microsoft should fix this ASAP as WPG is the program i used to use all the > > > time with XP ![]() > > > > > > Thank you............ > > > > > > "Redbeaver" wrote: > > > > > >> DARN!! i uploaded the wrong picture... i will upload another one at > > >> home.... > > >> sorry, guys... im at the office now... > > >> > > >> Ah yes, and i forgot to mention, and since i couldnt find the edit > > >> button, > > >> here goes: > > >> > > >> My system: > > >> AMD X2 3800+ > > >> 2Gb RAM > > >> 2x7900GT on SLI using Forceware 97.46 > > >> Samsung 205BW > > >> Vista Ultimate OEM > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > > > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| | FOUND THE SOLUTION!!!!!!!!! I FOUND THE SOLUTION!!!!! ![]() First off, there r 2 solutions i discovered...one is if u have Photoshop installed, the other if you don't. If you do have, in Control Panel, there's an Adobe Gamma tool. Run it by step-by-step wizard (or by Control Panel if u know what u'r doing) and create ur own Profile. Name it anything, i name mine Vista-1 just so its easier to see. It will create an ICM profile immediately installed in Window's system32-spool-color folder (given u dont change the saving location. better yet, dont even try.). Done? Back in Vista's control panel, open the Colour Management tool. In there u'll see the default ICC profile, mine named Samsung - Natural Color Pro 1.0 ICM, file name SM205BW.icm since my monitor is a Samsung 205BW. Click on Add.., and if you scroll down, u'll see ur profile; again, mine said Vista-1. U might need to click on Browse.. if u dont see yours becoz u saved it somewhere else... [Now, this part i'm not sure whether u need to do it, but i did it anyway.... Click on the Profiles button on the right bottom corner and click on Combine My Settings with System Defaults. then...] Click OK, and click on Vista-1 and click on Set as Default Profile. Click Close. Now try opening a picture in WPG ![]() Ooops, almost forgot, for people who doesnt have Photoshop, u can google any free ICC profile or go to: http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/adobergb.html Download these free ICC, and install some..or..well... i tried installing all of them anyway... Just extract them, then right click and select Install... Now go to Vista Control Panel, open Color Management, and click on Add... Scroll down and all of the installed ICC should be there. Pick one and set it default. [Again, u could click on Profiles and select Combine My Profile... but im not sure about this.] Click Close and you're good to go. Of course if it still shows the wrong colour just pick a different ICC and try it. First ICC i tried is the Adobe1998 one and it seems to be working fine... Of course im no expert and if any of u experts sees the better ICC in there (there r like 10~15 of them in the ZIP), by all means correct me. THat's all. Hope that helps ![]() "Dale" wrote: > That's why I love free markets. The more non-Microsoft solutions there are > to problems with Vista, the more Microsoft will learn to listen to its true > customers over and above its partners. > > Dale > > "Michael J" <MichaelJ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:854D98CF-E011-4620-A9F7-D59BD6C84261@microsoft.com... > > Redbeaver, > > > > I opened your image in Vista Windows Photo Gallery and then again in > > Exlorer > > AND Photoshop and you can CLEARLY see the poor image quality in W.Photo > > Gallery! > > > > In Windows Photo Gallery: > > 1. The image is much darker than the photoshop (reference and color > > monitored image) > > 2. The image exhibits obvious pixelation in the clouds in the center and > > center right of the image > > 3. The image looks artificially saturated beyond the reference image in > > Photoshop (which is an ICC color aware environment). > > > > Everyone I've spoken to who now has Vista has noticed this problem. To the > > novice , the problem may not be apparent at first. However, to the > > photographer and just about anyone else who is color aware, can see this > > problem. I really wish Microsoft will address this as soon as possible. > > Meanwhile, I have switched to Google's Picasa as my picture photo gallery > > (to > > manage images) and it totally ROCKS. I encouraged those frustrated by this > > Vista Windows Photo Gallery problem, to try out Picasa - I think you will > > like it. > > > > -Michael > > > > " > >> > >> "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:A292B8D6-65E1-4047-8B44-AA8C6E2C5DFA@microsoft.com... > >> > There you go, guys... sorry about the triple posting... > >> > > >> > Original Pic: > >> > http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/189/errorla7.jpg > >> > > >> > as wallapaper/WPG/Paint: > >> > http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/6475/errorvt6.jpg > >> > > >> > See what i mean? Anybody can correct this so far? > >> > > >> > Microsoft should fix this ASAP as WPG is the program i used to use all > >> > the > >> > time with XP ![]() > >> > > >> > Thank you............ > >> > > >> > "Redbeaver" wrote: > >> > > >> >> DARN!! i uploaded the wrong picture... i will upload another one at > >> >> home.... > >> >> sorry, guys... im at the office now... > >> >> > >> >> Ah yes, and i forgot to mention, and since i couldnt find the edit > >> >> button, > >> >> here goes: > >> >> > >> >> My system: > >> >> AMD X2 3800+ > >> >> 2Gb RAM > >> >> 2x7900GT on SLI using Forceware 97.46 > >> >> Samsung 205BW > >> >> Vista Ultimate OEM > >> >> > >> >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| | Re: FOUND THE SOLUTION!!!!!!!!! Good find, furry one. Thanks for posting it! Dale "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:5818C44C-B1CE-40DC-AD57-378B89031B1D@microsoft.com... >I FOUND THE SOLUTION!!!!! > > ![]() > > First off, there r 2 solutions i discovered...one is if u have Photoshop > installed, the other if you don't. > > If you do have, in Control Panel, there's an Adobe Gamma tool. Run it by > step-by-step wizard (or by Control Panel if u know what u'r doing) and > create > ur own Profile. Name it anything, i name mine Vista-1 just so its easier > to > see. It will create an ICM profile immediately installed in Window's > system32-spool-color folder (given u dont change the saving location. > better > yet, dont even try.). Done? > Back in Vista's control panel, open the Colour Management tool. In there > u'll see the default ICC profile, mine named Samsung - Natural Color Pro > 1.0 > ICM, file name SM205BW.icm since my monitor is a Samsung 205BW. Click on > Add.., and if you scroll down, u'll see ur profile; again, mine said > Vista-1. > U might need to click on Browse.. if u dont see yours becoz u saved it > somewhere else... > [Now, this part i'm not sure whether u need to do it, but i did it > anyway.... Click on the Profiles button on the right bottom corner and > click > on Combine My Settings with System Defaults. then...] > Click OK, and click on Vista-1 and click on Set as Default Profile. Click > Close. > > Now try opening a picture in WPG ![]() > > Ooops, almost forgot, for people who doesnt have Photoshop, u can google > any > free ICC profile or go to: > http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/adobergb.html > Download these free ICC, and install some..or..well... i tried installing > all of them anyway... Just extract them, then right click and select > Install... > > Now go to Vista Control Panel, open Color Management, and click on Add... > Scroll down and all of the installed ICC should be there. Pick one and set > it > default. [Again, u could click on Profiles and select Combine My > Profile... > but im not sure about this.] Click Close and you're good to go. > > Of course if it still shows the wrong colour just pick a different ICC and > try it. First ICC i tried is the Adobe1998 one and it seems to be working > fine... Of course im no expert and if any of u experts sees the better ICC > in > there (there r like 10~15 of them in the ZIP), by all means correct me. > > THat's all. > > Hope that helps ![]() > > > "Dale" wrote: > >> That's why I love free markets. The more non-Microsoft solutions there >> are >> to problems with Vista, the more Microsoft will learn to listen to its >> true >> customers over and above its partners. >> >> Dale >> >> "Michael J" <MichaelJ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:854D98CF-E011-4620-A9F7-D59BD6C84261@microsoft.com... >> > Redbeaver, >> > >> > I opened your image in Vista Windows Photo Gallery and then again in >> > Exlorer >> > AND Photoshop and you can CLEARLY see the poor image quality in W.Photo >> > Gallery! >> > >> > In Windows Photo Gallery: >> > 1. The image is much darker than the photoshop (reference and color >> > monitored image) >> > 2. The image exhibits obvious pixelation in the clouds in the center >> > and >> > center right of the image >> > 3. The image looks artificially saturated beyond the reference image in >> > Photoshop (which is an ICC color aware environment). >> > >> > Everyone I've spoken to who now has Vista has noticed this problem. To >> > the >> > novice , the problem may not be apparent at first. However, to the >> > photographer and just about anyone else who is color aware, can see >> > this >> > problem. I really wish Microsoft will address this as soon as possible. >> > Meanwhile, I have switched to Google's Picasa as my picture photo >> > gallery >> > (to >> > manage images) and it totally ROCKS. I encouraged those frustrated by >> > this >> > Vista Windows Photo Gallery problem, to try out Picasa - I think you >> > will >> > like it. >> > >> > -Michael >> > >> > " >> >> >> >> "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> >> news:A292B8D6-65E1-4047-8B44-AA8C6E2C5DFA@microsoft.com... >> >> > There you go, guys... sorry about the triple posting... >> >> > >> >> > Original Pic: >> >> > http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/189/errorla7.jpg >> >> > >> >> > as wallapaper/WPG/Paint: >> >> > http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/6475/errorvt6.jpg >> >> > >> >> > See what i mean? Anybody can correct this so far? >> >> > >> >> > Microsoft should fix this ASAP as WPG is the program i used to use >> >> > all >> >> > the >> >> > time with XP ![]() >> >> > >> >> > Thank you............ >> >> > >> >> > "Redbeaver" wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> DARN!! i uploaded the wrong picture... i will upload another one at >> >> >> home.... >> >> >> sorry, guys... im at the office now... >> >> >> >> >> >> Ah yes, and i forgot to mention, and since i couldnt find the edit >> >> >> button, >> >> >> here goes: >> >> >> >> >> >> My system: >> >> >> AMD X2 3800+ >> >> >> 2Gb RAM >> >> >> 2x7900GT on SLI using Forceware 97.46 >> >> >> Samsung 205BW >> >> >> Vista Ultimate OEM >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Photo Gallery (WPG) - appalling display quality OK... now I'm curious... I know a bit color impaired, but I don't see the differences... here's the screen shot of the picture as background, in Paint, and in Photo Gallery... http://www.papajohn.org/Temp/Vista-Pix.jpg As I haven't done anything, am I lucky or just not seeing well? PapaJohn "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:6CCBF2A6-F0EA-4DBE-8FDF-C7EEBE5BF93F@microsoft.com... > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for the reply. Good to see I'm not alone in this boat ![]() > > Yeah, I just installed Photoshop CS2 now, and I couldnt do anything about > the ICC profile. PS noted that the profile isn't right, so I chose 'Do Not > Use' instead of 'Use Anyway'. But then it shows nicely, unlike WPG. > > Yeah, thats why I posted here so hopefully MS can do something about this. > > Regards, > Dave > > > "Michael J" wrote: > >> Redbeaver, >> >> I opened your image in Vista Windows Photo Gallery and then again in >> Exlorer >> AND Photoshop and you can CLEARLY see the poor image quality in W.Photo >> Gallery! >> >> In Windows Photo Gallery: >> 1. The image is much darker than the photoshop (reference and color >> monitored image) >> 2. The image exhibits obvious pixelation in the clouds in the center and >> center right of the image >> 3. The image looks artificially saturated beyond the reference image in >> Photoshop (which is an ICC color aware environment). >> >> Everyone I've spoken to who now has Vista has noticed this problem. To >> the >> novice , the problem may not be apparent at first. However, to the >> photographer and just about anyone else who is color aware, can see this >> problem. I really wish Microsoft will address this as soon as possible. >> Meanwhile, I have switched to Google's Picasa as my picture photo gallery >> (to >> manage images) and it totally ROCKS. I encouraged those frustrated by >> this >> Vista Windows Photo Gallery problem, to try out Picasa - I think you will >> like it. >> >> -Michael >> >> " >> > >> > "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> > news:A292B8D6-65E1-4047-8B44-AA8C6E2C5DFA@microsoft.com... >> > > There you go, guys... sorry about the triple posting... >> > > >> > > Original Pic: >> > > http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/189/errorla7.jpg >> > > >> > > as wallapaper/WPG/Paint: >> > > http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/6475/errorvt6.jpg >> > > >> > > See what i mean? Anybody can correct this so far? >> > > >> > > Microsoft should fix this ASAP as WPG is the program i used to use >> > > all the >> > > time with XP ![]() >> > > >> > > Thank you............ >> > > >> > > "Redbeaver" wrote: >> > > >> > >> DARN!! i uploaded the wrong picture... i will upload another one at >> > >> home.... >> > >> sorry, guys... im at the office now... >> > >> >> > >> Ah yes, and i forgot to mention, and since i couldnt find the edit >> > >> button, >> > >> here goes: >> > >> >> > >> My system: >> > >> AMD X2 3800+ >> > >> 2Gb RAM >> > >> 2x7900GT on SLI using Forceware 97.46 >> > >> Samsung 205BW >> > >> Vista Ultimate OEM >> > >> >> > >> Thanks! >> > >> > >> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Photo Gallery (WPG) - appalling display quality Son, i'm afraid i have to tell you the truth......... JUST KIDDING ![]() No, that means the colour profile that Vista installed according to your monitor (and probably ur video card as well) is correct. My Samsung 205BW, was not. THat's why. Lucky guy ![]() "PapaJohn" wrote: > OK... now I'm curious... I know a bit color impaired, but I don't see the > differences... here's the screen shot of the picture as background, in > Paint, and in Photo Gallery... > > http://www.papajohn.org/Temp/Vista-Pix.jpg > > As I haven't done anything, am I lucky or just not seeing well? > > PapaJohn > > "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:6CCBF2A6-F0EA-4DBE-8FDF-C7EEBE5BF93F@microsoft.com... > > Hi Mike, > > > > Thanks for the reply. Good to see I'm not alone in this boat ![]() > > > > Yeah, I just installed Photoshop CS2 now, and I couldnt do anything about > > the ICC profile. PS noted that the profile isn't right, so I chose 'Do Not > > Use' instead of 'Use Anyway'. But then it shows nicely, unlike WPG. > > > > Yeah, thats why I posted here so hopefully MS can do something about this. > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > > > "Michael J" wrote: > > > >> Redbeaver, > >> > >> I opened your image in Vista Windows Photo Gallery and then again in > >> Exlorer > >> AND Photoshop and you can CLEARLY see the poor image quality in W.Photo > >> Gallery! > >> > >> In Windows Photo Gallery: > >> 1. The image is much darker than the photoshop (reference and color > >> monitored image) > >> 2. The image exhibits obvious pixelation in the clouds in the center and > >> center right of the image > >> 3. The image looks artificially saturated beyond the reference image in > >> Photoshop (which is an ICC color aware environment). > >> > >> Everyone I've spoken to who now has Vista has noticed this problem. To > >> the > >> novice , the problem may not be apparent at first. However, to the > >> photographer and just about anyone else who is color aware, can see this > >> problem. I really wish Microsoft will address this as soon as possible. > >> Meanwhile, I have switched to Google's Picasa as my picture photo gallery > >> (to > >> manage images) and it totally ROCKS. I encouraged those frustrated by > >> this > >> Vista Windows Photo Gallery problem, to try out Picasa - I think you will > >> like it. > >> > >> -Michael > >> > >> " > >> > > >> > "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> > news:A292B8D6-65E1-4047-8B44-AA8C6E2C5DFA@microsoft.com... > >> > > There you go, guys... sorry about the triple posting... > >> > > > >> > > Original Pic: > >> > > http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/189/errorla7.jpg > >> > > > >> > > as wallapaper/WPG/Paint: > >> > > http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/6475/errorvt6.jpg > >> > > > >> > > See what i mean? Anybody can correct this so far? > >> > > > >> > > Microsoft should fix this ASAP as WPG is the program i used to use > >> > > all the > >> > > time with XP ![]() > >> > > > >> > > Thank you............ > >> > > > >> > > "Redbeaver" wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> DARN!! i uploaded the wrong picture... i will upload another one at > >> > >> home.... > >> > >> sorry, guys... im at the office now... > >> > >> > >> > >> Ah yes, and i forgot to mention, and since i couldnt find the edit > >> > >> button, > >> > >> here goes: > >> > >> > >> > >> My system: > >> > >> AMD X2 3800+ > >> > >> 2Gb RAM > >> > >> 2x7900GT on SLI using Forceware 97.46 > >> > >> Samsung 205BW > >> > >> Vista Ultimate OEM > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Photo Gallery (WPG) - appalling display quality Thanks for showing your pix... it made it a lot easier to wonder what you were seeing. Great picture!!! PapaJohn "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:41E6AF2D-446B-4E8E-B74D-819E18C9CB4E@microsoft.com... > Son, i'm afraid i have to tell you the truth......... > > JUST KIDDING ![]() > > No, that means the colour profile that Vista installed according to your > monitor (and probably ur video card as well) is correct. My Samsung 205BW, > was not. THat's why. > > Lucky guy ![]() > > "PapaJohn" wrote: > >> OK... now I'm curious... I know a bit color impaired, but I don't see the >> differences... here's the screen shot of the picture as background, in >> Paint, and in Photo Gallery... >> >> http://www.papajohn.org/Temp/Vista-Pix.jpg >> >> As I haven't done anything, am I lucky or just not seeing well? >> >> PapaJohn >> >> "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:6CCBF2A6-F0EA-4DBE-8FDF-C7EEBE5BF93F@microsoft.com... >> > Hi Mike, >> > >> > Thanks for the reply. Good to see I'm not alone in this boat ![]() >> > >> > Yeah, I just installed Photoshop CS2 now, and I couldnt do anything >> > about >> > the ICC profile. PS noted that the profile isn't right, so I chose 'Do >> > Not >> > Use' instead of 'Use Anyway'. But then it shows nicely, unlike WPG. >> > >> > Yeah, thats why I posted here so hopefully MS can do something about >> > this. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Dave >> > >> > >> > "Michael J" wrote: >> > >> >> Redbeaver, >> >> >> >> I opened your image in Vista Windows Photo Gallery and then again in >> >> Exlorer >> >> AND Photoshop and you can CLEARLY see the poor image quality in >> >> W.Photo >> >> Gallery! >> >> >> >> In Windows Photo Gallery: >> >> 1. The image is much darker than the photoshop (reference and color >> >> monitored image) >> >> 2. The image exhibits obvious pixelation in the clouds in the center >> >> and >> >> center right of the image >> >> 3. The image looks artificially saturated beyond the reference image >> >> in >> >> Photoshop (which is an ICC color aware environment). >> >> >> >> Everyone I've spoken to who now has Vista has noticed this problem. To >> >> the >> >> novice , the problem may not be apparent at first. However, to the >> >> photographer and just about anyone else who is color aware, can see >> >> this >> >> problem. I really wish Microsoft will address this as soon as >> >> possible. >> >> Meanwhile, I have switched to Google's Picasa as my picture photo >> >> gallery >> >> (to >> >> manage images) and it totally ROCKS. I encouraged those frustrated by >> >> this >> >> Vista Windows Photo Gallery problem, to try out Picasa - I think you >> >> will >> >> like it. >> >> >> >> -Michael >> >> >> >> " >> >> > >> >> > "Redbeaver" <Redbeaver@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> >> > news:A292B8D6-65E1-4047-8B44-AA8C6E2C5DFA@microsoft.com... >> >> > > There you go, guys... sorry about the triple posting... >> >> > > >> >> > > Original Pic: >> >> > > http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/189/errorla7.jpg >> >> > > >> >> > > as wallapaper/WPG/Paint: >> >> > > http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/6475/errorvt6.jpg >> >> > > >> >> > > See what i mean? Anybody can correct this so far? >> >> > > >> >> > > Microsoft should fix this ASAP as WPG is the program i used to use >> >> > > all the >> >> > > time with XP ![]() >> >> > > >> >> > > Thank you............ >> >> > > >> >> > > "Redbeaver" wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > >> DARN!! i uploaded the wrong picture... i will upload another one >> >> > >> at >> >> > >> home.... >> >> > >> sorry, guys... im at the office now... >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Ah yes, and i forgot to mention, and since i couldnt find the >> >> > >> edit >> >> > >> button, >> >> > >> here goes: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> My system: >> >> > >> AMD X2 3800+ >> >> > >> 2Gb RAM >> >> > >> 2x7900GT on SLI using Forceware 97.46 >> >> > >> Samsung 205BW >> >> > >> Vista Ultimate OEM >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Thanks! >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Windows Photo Gallery: Extremely bad quality zoom feature | Vista music pictures video | |||
| Change Windows Photo Gallery Display Size | Vista music pictures video | |||
| Photo Gallery print quality | Vista music pictures video | |||
| Windows Photo Gallery Edit File Size and Quality | Vista music pictures video | |||