Hi all,

I have a Vista laptop that generally uses wi-fi to connect to the
local network via, but sometimes I plug in the Ethernet (when I need
to do big file transfers).

If I open Task Manager > Networking tab, I can see that Web browser
traffic spikes up within the "Local Area Connection" -- however, local
file sharing (ie, copying files between the laptop and other PCs on
the LAN) is over the wi-fi.



Any advice? Thanks! -Scott

In general, Windows will use both networks interfaces at the same time. If
one channel becomes full it will begin usage on the other. It picks one to
start the connection and then holds on to that for the duration of the
transfer, (unless something goes wrong and it has to try again). With
browser traffic multiple connections are made (for the various parts of a
web page). So in this case the first connection may be WiFi, now that
connection is busy the second connection is made to the wired interface. In
the case of a file transfer, a connection is opened and that connection is
used for the transfer. (A second concurrent transfer would open another
connection on the other interface).

In your case the priorities for the two interfaces are probably the same and
the WiFi is 'first' in the list of available interfaces. You can set the
'cost' of the two interfaces to be different and that will bias the
selection.
This is done in the advanced settings of the properties of TCP/IP for IPV4.
This is the 'metric' for the device. The higher number the lower the
priority. the IP protocol will start a connection with the connection that
is currently unused and has the lowest metric, So if you set the metric for
the wireless to 2 and the metric for the wired to 1 the selection will be
biased to start on the wired if both are available.

I would simply turn off the wireless on the laptop myself. (most laptops
make that easy with a button so that they can be used on a plane).

Michael
Vista Home premium


"turnstyle" <turnstyle@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:28bdceba-0a70-4357-a8ee-8732909f97be@xxxxxx

> Hi all,
>
> I have a Vista laptop that generally uses wi-fi to connect to the
> local network via, but sometimes I plug in the Ethernet (when I need
> to do big file transfers).
>
> If I open Task Manager > Networking tab, I can see that Web browser
> traffic spikes up within the "Local Area Connection" -- however, local
> file sharing (ie, copying files between the laptop and other PCs on
> the LAN) is over the wi-fi.
>
> Any advice? Thanks! -Scott

Hi Michael, thanks.

I've actually tried manually setting the metric priority of both
adapters (wire=1, wi-fi=2), and also used the "advanced" proerties to
place the wired adapter ahead of the wireless.

If I boot connected to the wire, then everything passes over the wire.
If I disconnect the wire, then everything passes over wi-fi. If put
the wire back in, then Web traffic passes over the wire, but local
traffic remains on the wi-fi.

Anything else I might try?

(I understand that I can turn off the radio, but I'd love to make this
"just work" if possible!)

thanks again, -Scott

It is possible that the system only pays attention to the metric on initial
boot so that later changes are not taken into account I do not have enough
knowledge to make a real statement there.

I have assumed that you have the wireless and the wired both going to the
same router. There was a recent thread concerning a setup where one was
connected to a corporate web and the other to an external web. I made some
suggestions as to prioritizing the DNS servers in that case but I don't know
how well that worked out.

I have a setup that is what I assumed you have, the wireless is connected to
the same router as my wired.
Vista will do its best to optimized the operation so I just let it do its
thing.

Have you tried timing the copying of a large file to see if it really slows
things down under both connected vs. just the wired?

Michael


"turnstyle" <turnstyle@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1c4c0d0c-f2d8-4338-8682-3238c769b7fe@xxxxxx

> Hi Michael, thanks.
>
> I've actually tried manually setting the metric priority of both
> adapters (wire=1, wi-fi=2), and also used the "advanced" proerties to
> place the wired adapter ahead of the wireless.
>
> If I boot connected to the wire, then everything passes over the wire.
> If I disconnect the wire, then everything passes over wi-fi. If put
> the wire back in, then Web traffic passes over the wire, but local
> traffic remains on the wi-fi.
>
> Anything else I might try?
>
> (I understand that I can turn off the radio, but I'd love to make this
> "just work" if possible!)
>
> thanks again, -Scott

I'm not in any dual-network situation -- just a home LAN, with a few
PCs behind the router.

And it is definitely slower when Task Manager indicates that the
traffic is over wi-fi rather than the wire (I had even wondered if it
might be a Task Manager cosmetic bug rather than something funky with
the network).

Do you have both wi-fi and wire available, Vista laptop? It's easy for
me to reproduce:

1) boot with both wire and wireless connections

2) open Task Manager > Networking tab

3) browse the Web and copy a file over the LAN -- you should see both
over the wired connection

4) unplug the Ethernet

5) browse the Web and copy a file over the LAN -- you should see both
over the wireless connection

6) plug the Ethernet back in

7) browse the Web and copy a file over the LAN -- now the Web traffic
shows up under the wired connection, and the local file copy under the
wireless.

I'd certainly be very interested to know if the same happens for you
-- but I understand it's a bit of a chore, so no worries!

-Scott

Interesting the way it works. (note that the machine with both interfaces is
still an XP).

Both interfaces plugged in (the wireless is a PC card), power up for a
wakeup from hibernate.
The link for the wireless is established, the wired interface is
established. Begin a transfer it occurs only over the wired interface, the
wireless is ignored - as if it had not completed its setup.

Unplug the wired, transfer fails, did not automatically transfer to
wireless, the wireless completes the setup and announces that it is ready.
Started transfer again and it start over the wireless (natch, wired is
unplugged.) Plug the wired back in announced that it was connected again,
but did not start using it for transfers.

Stopped the transfer. Restarted (now both are connected) began with the
wireless after awhile (this was a 1GB transfer) the wired kicked in also.
The wired was running about 0.4%, the wireless running 25%

My times
Wireless only 12:30
Wired only 01:57
Added wireless , only used wired 01:56
remove wired, but wired back in only used wired 01:57

tried to get to internet ... Dog Slow!!!..
repaired wireless, repaired wired, now network fast again, getting a
streaming video, only used wired
repaired wired, repaired wireless, network fast only used wireless.

My results (on XP!!) are that if the wired is available it is used in
preference to the wireless. (both for local and internet)

Wish I had a Vista with both to test.


"turnstyle" <turnstyle@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c8de2006-9fff-429a-8392-7df02b9d4f16@xxxxxx

> I'm not in any dual-network situation -- just a home LAN, with a few
> PCs behind the router.
>
> And it is definitely slower when Task Manager indicates that the
> traffic is over wi-fi rather than the wire (I had even wondered if it
> might be a Task Manager cosmetic bug rather than something funky with
> the network).
>
> Do you have both wi-fi and wire available, Vista laptop? It's easy for
> me to reproduce:
>
> 1) boot with both wire and wireless connections
>
> 2) open Task Manager > Networking tab
>
> 3) browse the Web and copy a file over the LAN -- you should see both
> over the wired connection
>
> 4) unplug the Ethernet
>
> 5) browse the Web and copy a file over the LAN -- you should see both
> over the wireless connection
>
> 6) plug the Ethernet back in
>
> 7) browse the Web and copy a file over the LAN -- now the Web traffic
> shows up under the wired connection, and the local file copy under the
> wireless.
>
> I'd certainly be very interested to know if the same happens for you
> -- but I understand it's a bit of a chore, so no worries!
>
> -Scott

whoops should have been


repaired wired, repaired wireless, network fast only used wired. ******

Michael


"Michael Walraven" <mexxwalraven@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:373FBE9A-B9C5-4EC7-B317-772DDE176E47@xxxxxx

> Interesting the way it works. (note that the machine with both interfaces
> is still an XP).
>
> Both interfaces plugged in (the wireless is a PC card), power up for a
> wakeup from hibernate.
> The link for the wireless is established, the wired interface is
> established. Begin a transfer it occurs only over the wired interface, the
> wireless is ignored - as if it had not completed its setup.
>
> Unplug the wired, transfer fails, did not automatically transfer to
> wireless, the wireless completes the setup and announces that it is ready.
> Started transfer again and it start over the wireless (natch, wired is
> unplugged.) Plug the wired back in announced that it was connected again,
> but did not start using it for transfers.
>
> Stopped the transfer. Restarted (now both are connected) began with the
> wireless after awhile (this was a 1GB transfer) the wired kicked in also.
> The wired was running about 0.4%, the wireless running 25%
>
> My times
> Wireless only 12:30
> Wired only 01:57
> Added wireless , only used wired 01:56
> remove wired, but wired back in only used wired 01:57
>
> tried to get to internet ... Dog Slow!!!..
> repaired wireless, repaired wired, now network fast again, getting a
> streaming video, only used wired
> repaired wired, repaired wireless, network fast only used wireless.
>
> My results (on XP!!) are that if the wired is available it is used in
> preference to the wireless. (both for local and internet)
>
> Wish I had a Vista with both to test.
>
>
> "turnstyle" <turnstyle@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:c8de2006-9fff-429a-8392-7df02b9d4f16@xxxxxx

>> I'm not in any dual-network situation -- just a home LAN, with a few
>> PCs behind the router.
>>
>> And it is definitely slower when Task Manager indicates that the
>> traffic is over wi-fi rather than the wire (I had even wondered if it
>> might be a Task Manager cosmetic bug rather than something funky with
>> the network).
>>
>> Do you have both wi-fi and wire available, Vista laptop? It's easy for
>> me to reproduce:
>>
>> 1) boot with both wire and wireless connections
>>
>> 2) open Task Manager > Networking tab
>>
>> 3) browse the Web and copy a file over the LAN -- you should see both
>> over the wired connection
>>
>> 4) unplug the Ethernet
>>
>> 5) browse the Web and copy a file over the LAN -- you should see both
>> over the wireless connection
>>
>> 6) plug the Ethernet back in
>>
>> 7) browse the Web and copy a file over the LAN -- now the Web traffic
>> shows up under the wired connection, and the local file copy under the
>> wireless.
>>
>> I'd certainly be very interested to know if the same happens for you
>> -- but I understand it's a bit of a chore, so no worries!
>>
>> -Scott

>

So, even though we're now comparing XP to Vista, you'd also say that
it didn't work as expected?

Per earlier, I could always manually turn off the radio when I want to
force the Ethernet connection -- but it just bugs me because it seems
like this should work.

Did you check your 'metric' settings?

-Scott

on the XP test, if the wired was available then it was used for both local
and internet. The wireless was used only if the wired was not there. I was
expecting it to use both so was a little suppressed. It ended up using the
faster link that was good.

(additional point - my hardwire link was 100 Mb, the ethernet was 54 Mb.)

Michael

"turnstyle" <turnstyle@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1c39c389-9c10-4981-b241-978af28c908a@xxxxxx

> So, even though we're now comparing XP to Vista, you'd also say that
> it didn't work as expected?
>
> Per earlier, I could always manually turn off the radio when I want to
> force the Ethernet connection -- but it just bugs me because it seems
> like this should work.
>
> Did you check your 'metric' settings?
>
> -Scott

I thought here you meant that the wire didn't work right after you
plugged it back in:

> Stopped the transfer. Restarted (now both are connected) began with the
> wireless after awhile (this was a 1GB transfer) the wired kicked in also.
> The wired was running about 0.4%, the wireless running 25%

Doesn't that mean very poor wire performance?

-Scott