![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | Is the LLTD responder required on XP SP3 Must I install the LLTD responder on XP SP3 machines to allow a Vista machine to see the XP machines on the network? -- ..Bill. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Is the LLTD responder required on XP SP3 On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:46:04 -0700, "Bill" <no@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >Must I install the LLTD responder on XP SP3 machines to allow a Vista >machine to see the XP machines on the network? can see each other and share files without it. The only purpose of the LLTD Responder is to allow an XP computer to appear in Vista's "Network Map". -- Best Wishes, Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking) Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program http://mvp.support.microsoft.com |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Is the LLTD responder required on XP SP3 Hi The LLTD responder can make Networking life a little easier but it should work without it too. Jack (MVP-Networking). "Bill" <no@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uslq01O0IHA.3884@xxxxxx Quote: > Must I install the LLTD responder on XP SP3 machines to allow a Vista > machine to see the XP machines on the network? > > -- > .Bill. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Is the LLTD responder required on XP SP3 On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:13:28 +0100, Gordon wrote: Quote: >AFAIK LLTD is included in SP3 anyway - trying to find a "kosher" >reference.... not included in SP3 and that LLTD did not work before he installed it manually. It would be nice to have at least a second source though. Hans-Georg -- No mail, please. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Is the LLTD responder required on XP SP3 Hans-Georg Michna wrote: Quote: > It would be nice to have at least a second source though. appear in the list for any network connection on any of my three XP SP3 machines. After following the manual install instruction LLTD did appear on the network connections on all three XP SP3 machines. -- ..Bill. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Is the LLTD responder required on XP SP3 On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:09:58 -0700, Bill wrote: Quote: >Hans-Georg Michna wrote: Quote: Quote: >> It would be nice to have at least a second source though. Quote: >Well, I am not an authoritative source but I can say that LLTD did not >appear in the list for any network connection on any of my three XP SP3 >machines. After following the manual install instruction LLTD did >appear on the network connections on all three XP SP3 machines. that would be an indication, but the question remains whether the LLTD function was there even though LLTD was not explicitly visible. The real question is whether a Vista PC can see XP SP3 PCs in its network map without the manual LLTD installation. Hans-Georg -- No mail, please. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Is the LLTD responder required on XP SP3 Hans-Georg Michna wrote: Quote: > The real question is whether a Vista PC can see XP SP3 > PCs in its network map without the manual LLTD installation. PCs in its full map view until I performed the manual LLTD install on the XP PCs. After installing LLTD on one XP PC I opened the full map in Vista and that one XP PC was displayed. The other two were not. I then installed LLTD on the other two, opend the full map view and all three XP PCs were displayed. -- ..Bill. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Is the LLTD responder required on XP SP3 On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:03:51 -0700, Bill wrote: Quote: >Hans-Georg Michna wrote: Quote: Quote: >> The real question is whether a Vista PC can see XP SP3 >> PCs in its network map without the manual LLTD installation. Quote: >In my case the answer is no. The Vista PC did not show any of the XP >PCs in its full map view until I performed the manual LLTD install on >the XP PCs. After installing LLTD on one XP PC I opened the full map in >Vista and that one XP PC was displayed. The other two were not. I then >installed LLTD on the other two, opend the full map view and all three >XP PCs were displayed. well, that sounds pretty convincing. So we conclude fairly firmly that Service Pack 3 does not contain the LLTD function. Thanks for the good information! Hans-Georg -- No mail, please. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Is the LLTD responder required on XP SP3 See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946480 . Hotfix 922120 is listed as included in SP3. "Hans-Georg Michna" <hans-georgNoEmailPlease@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:592q54hakjasl81hmkmpf6m13dai9nf16p@xxxxxx Quote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:03:51 -0700, Bill wrote: > Quote: >>Hans-Georg Michna wrote: Quote: Quote: >>> The real question is whether a Vista PC can see XP SP3 >>> PCs in its network map without the manual LLTD installation. Quote: >>In my case the answer is no. The Vista PC did not show any of the XP >>PCs in its full map view until I performed the manual LLTD install on >>the XP PCs. After installing LLTD on one XP PC I opened the full map in >>Vista and that one XP PC was displayed. The other two were not. I then >>installed LLTD on the other two, opend the full map view and all three >>XP PCs were displayed. > Bill, > > well, that sounds pretty convincing. > > So we conclude fairly firmly that Service Pack 3 does not > contain the LLTD function. > > Thanks for the good information! > > Hans-Georg > -- > No mail, please. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Is the LLTD responder required on XP SP3 On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:30:26 +0100, "Gordon" <gbplinux@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >Interestingly I bought a new laptop three months ago. I connected it to my >network, and immediately the XP machine (Pro SP2) was visible, and with >shared files and folders, by the Vista machine. I did nothing to make it >happen. it just did. Windows XP. XP and Vista can see each other and share files and folders without it. The only reason to install the LLTD Responder is to have XP appear in the network topology section of Vista's Network Map. Without it, XP will appear in the "can not be placed in the map" section of Vista's Network Map. -- Best Wishes, Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking) Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program http://mvp.support.microsoft.com |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| LLTD Responder won't install | Vista General | |||
| Auto Responder | Vista mail | |||
| Link Layer Topology Discovery (LLTD) Responder (KB922120) | Vista General | |||
| Link Layer Topology Discovery (LLTD) Responder for WinServer 2003 | Vista General | |||
| Not allowed to download LLTD responder? | Vista General | |||