![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Microsoft ACCESS 2003 HELP!!!! have a major problem. I am developing a database for a client that contains over 302 tables, all of which have thousands of rows. 301 of these tables need to be linked to the parent table, and all have the same primary key. However, I have recieved that evil error message that only 32 tables can be indexed. I have searched and searched, but cannot find a solution to this. I am desperate for any suggestions, even if it means taking avenues other than ACCESS 2003. The only requirements are that the database has the ability to be online, collecting data from other parties via some sort of form. Also, these tables must have full capabilities to be edited and controlled, not read-only. CAN ANYONE HELP ME??? There is a huge deadline coming in hours. Thanks! |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Microsoft ACCESS 2003 HELP!!!! Access is not very robust - especially with a large number of tables and/or a complex schema (such as it is). You didn't mention whether free was a consideration, but MySQL might be worth looking at. It has quirks too, but a zillion people use it (since it is free). HTH "Jana" <Jana@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:0513215C-AABB-41FB-822A-62783C1D53CB@xxxxxx Quote: > have a major problem. I am developing a database for a client that > contains > over 302 tables, all of which have thousands of rows. 301 of these tables > need to be linked to the parent table, and all have the same primary key. > However, I have recieved that evil error message that only 32 tables can > be > indexed. I have searched and searched, but cannot find a solution to > this. > I am desperate for any suggestions, even if it means taking avenues other > than ACCESS 2003. The only requirements are that the database has the > ability to be online, collecting data from other parties via some sort of > form. Also, these tables must have full capabilities to be edited and > controlled, not read-only. CAN ANYONE HELP ME??? There is a huge > deadline > coming in hours. Thanks! |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Access 2003 | Microsoft Office | |||
| MS Access 2003 & VISTA | Microsoft Office | |||
| outlook web access microsoft exchange service 2003 | .NET General | |||
| using microsoft office 2003 allong side of microsoft works with Vista Home Premium? | Vista General | |||
| Microsoft Office 2003 compatibility - Specifically - Access 2003! | Vista General | |||