Vista Tutorial - How can anything be this bad?

I open an Excel spreadsheet stored on one Vista machine on a second.
I cannot save the document because first it says it is read only (the
original is NOT read only).
I can not save the document back on the first machine with a different name
(e.g. vista sucks) because it says I do not have permission. However the
sharing on the first machine says I have full privileges for opening and
saving.
What a piece of crap this OS is. There is no reason for needlessly
complicating simple peer to peer networking with this layer of useless
non-security crud. It is obvious why businesses will not use the abomination
that is Vista.
I went through all the permission crap last week and it all worked fine.
Nothing has changed and now nothing works.
This is the reality of Vista.
I have been using Windows since it was DOS. If I did not have dedicated
Windows business software I would switch to the Mac. I've had it.

My two cents: The problems Vista has caused are absolutely not worth the
little, useless, added bells and whistles they added. None of my DOS
programs will run on Vista either, and networking is a nightmare.

Fred


"Nogginsaked" <fac_187@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23iWWMiWBJHA.1228@xxxxxx

Hi
Since hundred thousands of people can use Network sharing successfully it
seems to be more of configuration problem rather than Vista being "Bad".
As well as specific adjustment of each computer according to what it is
allowed to be shared.
Vista File and Printer Sharing-
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../bb727037.aspx
Windows XP File Sharing -
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;304040
Printer Sharing XP -
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u...utt_july2.mspx
Windows Native Firewall setting for Sharing XP -
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/875357
Windows XP patch for Sharing with Vista -
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922120
Jack (MVP-Networking).

"Nogginsaked" <fac_187@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23iWWMiWBJHA.1228@xxxxxx

How to network XP, and vista.
And link to vista file share from MS
For DOS, have a look at a Program called "dosbox" to install.
http://www.dosbox.com/

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../bb727037.aspx

Have a read of the above link re Vista File and Printer Sharing.

Permissions/Share info is there as well.

If using Norton, McAfee, Trend Micro I.S., make sure file and printer
sharing is enabled in THEIR firewall (or LAN allowed, depending on how their
Exceptions are worded in their Firewall)

1st thing to do is make sure that the Workgroup Name of ALL the computers is
the SAME.

In Vista Network and Sharing:

Network Discovery: ON (So it can see the other computers)

Network set to Private (Public is for hotspots, airports, etc)

File Sharing: ON

Public Folder Sharing: ON (Vista’s Public Folder is the same as XP’s Shared
Docs)

Password Protected: OFF (unless you want to set up identical usernames and
passwords (passwords can be different) on ALL computers in your Network) If
you have it ON, you will be asked for a username and password when you try to
access a Vista computer from an XP computer, or a Vista computer.

Also, run the XP’s Home or Small Office Network File and Printer Sharing
Wizard to include Vista in your “New� Network, even if you had an XP Network
set up prior to adding a Vista computer to it(redoing the Wizard seems to
work for XP machines!).

In “My Network Places�: “Set up a Home or Small Office Network�
OR under Accessories > Communications > Network Setup Wizard > Allow File
and Printer Sharing.

--
Mick Murphy - Qld - Australia


"Nogginsaked" wrote:

"Fred" <fdwight(ADD1)@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4A65CA90-309E-49B6-AF68-18A393F0C55F@xxxxxxjeeeze. DOS programs? Why not just go back to Windows for Workgroups?
Networking is NOT a nightmare - mine worked "out of the box".

"Nogginsaked" <fac_187@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23iWWMiWBJHA.1228@xxxxxxthat's normal network behaviour. Has been since NT4.....
And DO you have permission? That;s NORMAL network behaviour. Has been since
NT4....

Well you obviously do NOT have "full permissions".
Umm Windows never WAS "DOS"......

Gordon,

When you paid $5000.00 for a program that has been used for years, and has
the exact same functionality today as it did when I bought it, you might
begin to understand the frustrations with windows vista.

Fred

"Gordon" <gordonbparker@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eyTImBeBJHA.3888@xxxxxx

"Fred" <fdwight(ADD1)@cox.net> wrote in message
newsCA52B91-CD60-45A2-AD9D-42BAD9F4A009@xxxxxxYou paid $5,000 for a DOS program?
They saw you coming then.....
have you thought of using Microsoft Virtual PC and actually running your DOS
program on DOS rather than on Vista that has NO DOS AT ALL?

"Nogginsaked" <fac_187@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23iWWMiWBJHA.1228@xxxxxxIs the spreadsheet still open on the first machine when you attempt to open
it on the second? If so, file sharing provivions will not allow a copy to
open on any other networked machene except as read only.
What are your permissions on the machine you are actually using concerning
saving through the network on the machine owning the document?
the key word here is 'needlessly'. Think of how quickly a document would be
messed up if two people were making changes to a it unaware of and
uncoordinated with each other.

Learn how to set up networking and how to use files that are shared. What
else can I say? Until you do, you will be frequently reduced to semi-lucid
ranting.
And why do you think that networked Macs or Unix or Linux or... would be
different in this regard? Think about it. Suppose three different people
open a document at the same time and edit it. Then they try to save it. How
does the operating system"know" which is authoratative and the one to keep?
The last saved? The first saved?

If you are resaving under a different name, make sure you have save
permission on the machine that owns the document.

--

Tom
MSMVP 1998-2007

On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:13:49 +0100, "Gordon"
<gordonbparker@xxxxxx> wrote:
I might tactfully suggest that you don't have much exposure to
commercial software if you think $5K is a lot for a "program".
And here you highlight yet another shortcoming of Vista and MS.