Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Forums > Vista News

Vista - Performance Tweaking Myths

Reply
 
Old 08-06-2008   #1 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate x64
 
 

Performance Tweaking Myths

I just read this article over on LifeHacker.com. It could be of some interest for you as well. Enjoy.

Mythbusting: Debunking Common Windows Performance Tweaking Myths

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-06-2008   #2 (permalink)


Vista Home Premium x86
 
 

Re: Performance Tweaking Myths

My goodness.In XP I used to empty the prefetch file once a week,to get rid of "junk files".As for a Registry cleaner.I still use CrapCleaner,on both XP,and Vista,but avoid using the Registry option.

Good job the article does not advise against anti-virus products....then I would be really confused.

A nice read.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-06-2008   #3 (permalink)


Vista x64 Ultimate
 
 

Re: Performance Tweaking Myths

chkdsk (error checking) and defragmentation is all I do. I did setup the 12MB cache in the registry. The rest of the Vista options did not really load with my hardware specs being so high.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-06-2008   #4 (permalink)


Vista X64 Ultimate
 
 

Re: Performance Tweaking Myths

All I do is run a TuneUp once a week, which does a defrag, cleans up files that are no longer needed, and does a full system scan for viruses. I also uninstalled the features from Vista, that I don't need or wont use, including Windows Fax and Scan.

I know enough, where I can go in to the registry and delete orphaned entries without messing up my system.

A program that comes to mind, that can royally mess up the registry, is the registry cleaning tool in Fix-It Utilities. That thing can delete entries it should be deleting when run. I know, cause I tried Fix-It Utilities on XP a number of years ago, and it royally messed up a few things.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-06-2008   #5 (permalink)


vista ultamate 64bit
 
 

Re: Performance Tweaking Myths

Disabling QoS to Free Up 20% of Bandwidth

This tip made the rounds with people believing that Microsoft always allocates 20% of your bandwidth for Windows Update. According to the instructions, you were supposed to disable QoS in order to free up bandwidth. Unfortunately this tip was not only wrong, but disabling QoS will cause problems with applications that rely on it, like some streaming media or VoIP applications.
Rather than taking my word for it, you can read the official Microsoft response: "There have been claims in various published technical articles and newsgroup postings that Windows XP always reserves 20 percent of the available bandwidth for QoS. These claims are incorrect... One hundred percent of the network bandwidth is available to be shared by all programs unless a program specifically requests priority bandwidth."


*** COMMENT REMOVED BY: Brink ****
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-06-2008   #6 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate x64
 
 

Re: Performance Tweaking Myths

Loving the avatar, ripbox :P
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-06-2008   #7 (permalink)


Vista x64 Ultimate SP2, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 
 

Re: Performance Tweaking Myths

Hello Ripbox,

Please be sure that you read the entire tutorial before making a statement like that:

QoS Bandwidth Reserve Limit

Quote:
Information
  By default, Vista reserves 20 percent of the connection bandwidth for QoS traffic handled by the QoS Packet Scheduler. The reserved bandwidth is still available to all programs though unless a program, for example Windows Update, specifically requests priority bandwidth. Vista will then restrict the best effort traffic to 80 percent of the bandwidth to the other programs so that high priority traffic, for example Windows Update, can be accommodated. This will show you how to change the percentage of reserved bandwidth, or disable the reserved bandwidth to get back the full bandwidth so that everything will share all of the available bandwith all of the time.
However, I will update the tutorial to help clarify it even more.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention,
Shawn
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-06-2008   #8 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate x64 MAK, OpenSolaris 5, Gentoo 2008.1....
 
 

Re: Performance Tweaking Myths

A better compendium of myths:

XP Myths

Vista Requirements

Not a lot of myths for Vista, in fact none really mentioned - but the XP myths are still applicable to Vista for the most part, so....
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-06-2008   #9 (permalink)


Vista 64-bit Ultimate Win7 64-bit Ultimate XP SP3 32-bit Pro
 
 

Re: Performance Tweaking Myths

Quote  Quote: Originally Posted by Brink View Post
Hello Ripbox,

Please be sure that you read the entire tutorial before making a statement like that:

QoS Bandwidth Reserve Limit

Quote:
Information
  By default, Vista reserves 20 percent of the connection bandwidth for QoS traffic handled by the QoS Packet Scheduler. The reserved bandwidth is still available to all programs though unless a program, for example Windows Update, specifically requests priority bandwidth. Vista will then restrict the best effort traffic to 80 percent of the bandwidth to the other programs so that high priority traffic, for example Windows Update, can be accommodated. This will show you how to change the percentage of reserved bandwidth, or disable the reserved bandwidth to get back the full bandwidth so that everything will share all of the available bandwith all of the time.
However, I will update the tutorial to help clarify it even more.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention,
Shawn
Shawn is the Vista OS incarnate; you go Shawn!


Later Ted
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-07-2008   #10 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate SP1 x64
 
 

Re: Performance Tweaking Myths

yeah, most of this already makes sense to me, except i do disagree with a couple:

1: clearing the prefetch folder does shorten boot time (more specifically deleting the NTOSBOOT.......pf file does on my machine) but you end up with a longer logon time because your programs load at logon, not during boot. So it takes the same time, possibly longer.

2: I would have thought disabling pointless services when ur pc is limited to a small amount of ram would help your pc from paging more stuff everytime you run an app that needs a lot of memory.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Famous tech myths that just won't die Vista News
The 30 biggest technology myths exposed Vista News
Myths folk lore and tips on buring CDs and DVDs from Windows. Vista General
Vista and it Myths and so called "Music files deletions" Vista General
Myths about Vista newgroup settled! Vista General


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46