![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | defragging When I defrag my comp should I do nothing else while defrag is running/ -- -Symp EL |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: defragging Symp EL wrote: Quote: > When I defrag my comp should I do nothing else while defrag is running/ > sneeze, while Vista takes its usual 2 days to do a defrag. sigh... or download Auslogics defrag and use it instead of Vista's defrag ![]() Dave |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: defragging David wrote: Quote: > Symp EL wrote: Quote: >> When I defrag my comp should I do nothing else while defrag is running/ >> > sneeze, while Vista takes its usual 2 days to do a defrag. sigh... or > download Auslogics defrag and use it instead of Vista's defrag ![]() > > Dave website last night for the first time. Problem is, I've never heard of this company before and their update history page of defrag programme contain no dates. How long has this application been out? Should I take a chance and install it or use another non-MS app for this task? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: defragging Iain wrote: Quote: > David wrote: Quote: >> Symp EL wrote: Quote: >>> When I defrag my comp should I do nothing else while defrag is running/ >>> >> or sneeze, while Vista takes its usual 2 days to do a defrag. >> sigh... or download Auslogics defrag and use it instead of Vista's >> defrag ![]() >> >> Dave > website last night for the first time. > > Problem is, I've never heard of this company before and their update > history page of defrag programme contain no dates. > > How long has this application been out? Should I take a chance and > install it or use another non-MS app for this task? 3 machines (2 vista) and it has not blown up any of them. It isvery, very fast. I used it after hearing good things about it. u might do a bit of Googling to assure you that it is safe. dave |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: defragging Getting back to your original question - Vista's defrag is "low-level" - you can be doing other things. "Symp EL" <no.spam@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:CE8B0140-34E2-4450-9D4E-ED6C4475983C@xxxxxx Quote: > When I defrag my comp should I do nothing else while defrag is running/ > > -- > > -Symp EL > > > > > > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: defragging Hi, Do whatever you like. In Vista, defrag runs as a low level background service that does its work when you're not using the machine. Unlike older versions of the defrag utility, use of the utility does not interfere with normal operations, nor does it need you to stop doing what you do with your system. Now of course, if you really want to, you can use a different program that lets you watch pretty blocks move around while you don't use your machine, waiting endlessly until it finishes so that you can actually do something, but that's your choice. -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com "Symp EL" <no.spam@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:CE8B0140-34E2-4450-9D4E-ED6C4475983C@xxxxxx Quote: > When I defrag my comp should I do nothing else while defrag is running/ > > -- > > -Symp EL > > > > > > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: defragging Quote: > . Now of course, if you really want to, you can use a different > program that lets you watch pretty blocks move around while you don't > use your machine, waiting endlessly until it finishes so that you can > actually do something, but that's your choice. > It is quite fast and you don't have to twiddle your thumbs while it is running. dave |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: defragging My point was that many use a third party defrag program so that they can "see" what is happening, not because the program is better. To me, that's pointless. I want to use my systems, not watch them defrag. Plus, for the vast majority, defragging's affect on performance is way overrated. -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com "David" <david@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:MsmdnQqHGYti977anZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@xxxxxx Quote: > Quote: >> . Now of course, if you really want to, you can use a different program >> that lets you watch pretty blocks move around while you don't use your >> machine, waiting endlessly until it finishes so that you can actually do >> something, but that's your choice. >> > is quite fast and you don't have to twiddle your thumbs while it is > running. > > > dave |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: defragging Rick Rogers wrote: Quote: > My point was that many use a third party defrag program so that they > can "see" what is happening, not because the program is better. To me, > that's pointless. I want to use my systems, not watch them defrag. > Plus, for the vast majority, defragging's affect on performance is way > overrated. > anyone using a 3rd party defragger does so just to watch it run? Prove your point with a cite. You stretch the bounds of being BS artist. A heavily fragmented drive does impact performance while one barely fragmented shouldn't make any noticeable difference to the user. Dave |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: defragging Hi David, You're misinterpreting the statement. There are plenty of third party defraggers that work better, and there's nothing wrong with recommending or using one. The point of my statement is that recommending using one simply because a user wants to see a graphical representation of it is silly. Does anyone really want to sit and watch blocks move instead of using the machine? Most casual users (email, surfing, and maybe the family photos or occasional game) will never experience a heavily fragmented drive, and the improvement they may gain from any defragging utility will be marginal at best. Too often it's recommended to improve performance when the real cause of poor performance is ten tons of background process that they've allowed into the startup axis. -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com "David" <david@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:EMSdnXZtDeFaXbnanZ2dnUVZ_qCunZ2d@xxxxxx Quote: > Rick Rogers wrote: Quote: >> My point was that many use a third party defrag program so that they can >> "see" what is happening, not because the program is better. To me, that's >> pointless. I want to use my systems, not watch them defrag. Plus, for the >> vast majority, defragging's affect on performance is way overrated. >> > anyone using a 3rd party defragger does so just to watch it run? Prove > your point with a cite. You stretch the bounds of being BS artist. A > heavily fragmented drive does impact performance while one barely > fragmented shouldn't make any noticeable difference to the user. > > Dave |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Defragging | General Discussion | |||
| Defragging D? | General Discussion | |||
| defragging | Vista General | |||
| Defragging | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| SP1 and defragging | Vista General | |||