![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator Driver for Mobile Increased My Performance Score Intel Graphics Media Accelerator Driver for Mobile Increased My Performance Score Compaq C301nr Notebook (2006) Intel 940GML Chipset (Integrated Graphics) Vista Ultimate 64-Bit Celeron M 520 (1.6 MHz/533 MHz FSB/1 MB L2) 2 x 1-GB DDR2 RAM (= 2 GB) Windows Experience Index was all 4's except for Graphics (Aero), which was 2.0, yielding the 2.0 "overall" score, but performance seemed very good to excellent on this entry-level notebook. When I finally got around to installing Intel Graphics Media Accelerator for Mobile, I thought I noticed better visual performance but didn't check the scores, which I think are less important that our gut feeling for how "fast" a PC is running. When I finally got around to looking at the Experience Index, I noticed that it needed to be updated because of "new hardware found," so I did. The Experience score then went up to 2.3. I'm not bragging about an 0.3-point increase -- I'm just letting people know that if you want to squeeze more out of a PC that is based on Intel's integrated-graphics chipsets, try installing the appropriate Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (which as far as I know is just a driver, as opposed to some kind of add-on "accelerator," but I'm no expert). *Notebook originally came with Windows XP Home 32, Celeron 420 & 512 MB RAM. Ran fine. *After upgrading to Vista Home Basic, clearly needed 1 GB RAM, then ran fine. *Upgraded to 64-bits (Celeron 520 & Vista Ultimate 64) and 2 GB, runs excellent. My Personal Favorite Tips: + Check for and update (flash) your BIOS to the latest version. (Some will say this is unnecessary, but if they're not doing it, how would they know that it doesn't help?) + Check for FIRMware updates for peripherals (not just drivers). + Try both MANUFACTURER drivers and Microsoft-supplied drivers and see which works best. (I usually get better results from manufacturer drives, but one important exception was an Nvidia graphics card that just couldn't handle Nvidia's buggy Vista drivers and does just fine with the WDM drivers that Vista installs.) ++ My All-Time Favorite Tip: If one particular program/application doesn't run perfectly, uninstall it as soon as possible, because if it can't run itself well, who knows what parts of Vista it will want to screw up? (When I discover a program that doesn't run well on Vista, I schedule a complete reinstall of Vista, and leave it out the next time. Think "residual collateral damage.") |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Need Help with Intel Graphics Media Accelerator Driver | Vista hardware & devices | |||
| Intel® Graphics Media Accelerator 900 Issues | Vista hardware & devices | |||
| Intel Graphics Media Accelerator | Vista installation & setup | |||
| Intel Graphics Accelerator Driver for Vista 15.2.3 | Vista General | |||
| Intel Integrated Graphics Media Accelerator 950 GM | Vista performance & maintenance | |||