Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Donate Vista Tutorials Tags

Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
Register at Vista forums...the world biggest Windows Vista resource Join Vista Forums Now

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Newsgroups > Vista performance & maintenance

Physical Address Extension (PAE) does not work on vista as expected.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2008   #11 (permalink)
Mark
Guest


 

Re: Physical Address Extension (PAE) does not work on vista as expected.

Well, my goal was not to frustrate you more or make you upset with me.

My first post simply pointed out that there may be a difference in reported
memory depending on where you look: e.g. System Property may report 4GB, but
task manager may report less.
I didn't refer to BCEDIT until you replied with: "I suppose I should have
asked "what are the steps required for using PAE to actually remap
addressing to the extended areas?"

To that, I sent you to the instruction manual.
Have a nice day.

"Sarah White" <kuzetsa@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eUJUIToyIHA.2340@xxxxxx
Quote:

> I'm amazed that you're bothering to tell me that; my original post (top of
> this thread) said that I used BCDEDIT to enable PAE.
>
> As for changing "how memory is reported" I have two conflicting reports.
>
> Report 1) Control Panel\System: 4.0GB (2.75GB before BCDEDIT -> PAE)
> Report 2) Task manager "performance tab" (Physical Memory) Total 2813MB
>
> If you're saying style-2 (task manager or other) reports won't be changed
> by PAE, are you able to cite / reference a specific article? I'm curious
> if this is because my signed, WHQL drivers are trying to use the same
> address as a large portion of my RAM, or if some entirely unexplained
> thing is going on.
>
> As for style 1, I hate to break it to you, but control panel -> system
> (easily opened using [win] + [break] keys) is reporting a different
> (higher) number now that I'm using PAE: it actually says 4.0 GB now!
>
> Thanks, good idea for providing that link explaining BCDEDIT under the new
> windows bootloader. I personally found it a bit confusing (was very much
> accustom to using boot.ini) Personally, I like the abbreviated info (even
> though it isn't official) that I found here:
>
> http://www.ocmodshop.com/ocmodshop.aspx?a=989
>
> Note: I'm quite confused about the terms "nx" bit and "hot add" memory and
> a few other terms in there. I know there was a reference in my bios menu
> for something that might have been the "nx" bit... Some kind of security
> feature under the same screenfull of settings that had virtualization,
> disable core 1 (only use core 0) and CPU throttling.
>
> Mark H wrote:
Quote:

>> The point is:
>> If you don't have more than 4GB of memory, PAE will not change how
>> memory is reported.
>>
>> It is supported, but only through BCEDIT:
Old 06-09-2008   #12 (permalink)
JW
Guest


 

Re: Physical Address Extension (PAE) does not work on vista as expected.

Only server OS systems can support more then 4GB of memory with a 32bit OS
since the use memory mapping to provide 4GB of logical memory to different
running process which map to different physical memory addresses.
Vista 32 bit like most if not all personnel computer Boss can not address
more then 4GB since it does not use memory mapping.
"Sarah White" <kuzetsa@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eUJUIToyIHA.2340@xxxxxx
Quote:

> I'm amazed that you're bothering to tell me that; my original post (top of
> this thread) said that I used BCDEDIT to enable PAE.
>
> As for changing "how memory is reported" I have two conflicting reports.
>
> Report 1) Control Panel\System: 4.0GB (2.75GB before BCDEDIT -> PAE)
> Report 2) Task manager "performance tab" (Physical Memory) Total 2813MB
>
> If you're saying style-2 (task manager or other) reports won't be changed
> by PAE, are you able to cite / reference a specific article? I'm curious
> if this is because my signed, WHQL drivers are trying to use the same
> address as a large portion of my RAM, or if some entirely unexplained
> thing is going on.
>
> As for style 1, I hate to break it to you, but control panel -> system
> (easily opened using [win] + [break] keys) is reporting a different
> (higher) number now that I'm using PAE: it actually says 4.0 GB now!
>
> Thanks, good idea for providing that link explaining BCDEDIT under the new
> windows bootloader. I personally found it a bit confusing (was very much
> accustom to using boot.ini) Personally, I like the abbreviated info (even
> though it isn't official) that I found here:
>
> http://www.ocmodshop.com/ocmodshop.aspx?a=989
>
> Note: I'm quite confused about the terms "nx" bit and "hot add" memory and
> a few other terms in there. I know there was a reference in my bios menu
> for something that might have been the "nx" bit... Some kind of security
> feature under the same screenfull of settings that had virtualization,
> disable core 1 (only use core 0) and CPU throttling.
>
> Mark H wrote:
Quote:

>> The point is:
>> If you don't have more than 4GB of memory, PAE will not change how
>> memory is reported.
>>
>> It is supported, but only through BCEDIT:
Old 06-10-2008   #13 (permalink)
Mark H
Guest


 

Re: Physical Address Extension (PAE) does not work on vista as expected.

Let's try one more time, but I'll just give instructions:

From elevated cmd prompt:
bcdedit /set PAE forceenable
Reboot

The reboot is required before proceeding.
Most likely, not all RAM is being reported.
That's because on 32-bit OS, DEP is required when PAE is running. (Even
if not supported.)
DEP may cause other problems.

From elevated cmd prompt:
bcdedit /set nx AlwaysOff
bcdedit /set PAE forceenable
Reboot

It is proven that PAE and Creative sound cards won't work together.
There may be other configurations that don't work.

To turn off:
From elevated cmd prompt:
bcedit /set nx AlwaysOn
bcedit /set PAE default
Reboot

If it still doesn't work, it's not supported by your machine.



"Sarah White" <kuzetsa@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23zt6h7ayIHA.4848@xxxxxx
Quote:

> I upgraded (a so-called "clean install" on same partition... it made xp
> pro x64 unusable by renaming various system folders) to windows vista
> home basic hoping that PAE would work.
>
> I had assumed that 4GB RAM would be no problem (the intel e6600 core2duo
> in this system supports 64bit instructions, and as a result PAE works on
> linux just fine) though it is not doing what I expected.
>
> After installing Vista SP1 (came out recently) from windows update, I
> decided to try using BCDEDIT.EXE and set PAE to "force enable" mode...
> Not working as expected!!!
>
> Well, pressing [windows logo key on keyboard] and [break] at the same
> time (you can also bring that up by right clicking what XP called "my
> computer" and selecting "properties") ... windows now reports: Memory
> (RAM) 4.0 GB ... it was too good to be true:
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/283296
>
> --snip--
>
> Article ID : 283296
> Last Review : February 28, 2007
> Revision : 4.4
>
> """ Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition loads a standard VGA video
> driver for NVidia... """
>
> APPLIES TO
> • Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition (32-bit x86)
> • Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition (32-bit x86)
>
> --snip--
>
> Wrong on two counts!!!
>
> A) I'm using nvidia's latest WHQL drivers
>
> Windows is not using "standard VGA video driver" but is using Nvidia's
> latest digitally signed vista 32 bit drivers (Version 175.16) Digital
> Signer: Microsoft Windows Hardware Compatibility
>
> B) I'm running windows vista (with signed, WHQL drivers) and windows
> task manager still reports "physical memory (MB) 2813" on the
> performance tab!!!

Old 06-22-2008   #14 (permalink)
Sarah White
Guest


 

Re: Physical Address Extension (PAE) does not work on vista as expected.

I upgraded WinXP Pro x64 partition to vista because... let me think...
Sure, 4GB was nice, but practically ZERO driver support for XP Pro x64

As for your comment about "Only server OS systems..."

I suppose it is known that the limit is 4gb on XP (why though?)
-- http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms791485.aspx

The 4GB limit is really just OS developers being lazy (or greedy?)
Truly, PAE / NUMA / 4GB limit is far more reliable on linux (lol)
.... What do I know; I'm just a developer that has vista for gaming.

My opinion, greed -- the 64 bit OS is unnecessary to access 4GB or more
of memory, but then you are EMULATING 32bit mode for gaming and other
apps. My very first thought was to check vista's "help and support" ...

1) go to your start menu and open "help and support" in windows vista.
2) type "PAE" in the search
3) the only result is "Physical address expansion (PAE) (definition)"

They even admit / explain it's "up to 64 GB" but didn't mention they
will deny you access to your ram / hold out and sell you "upgraded"
64bit version of windows to make an extra buck. Just my $0.02

JW wrote:
Quote:

> Only server OS systems can support more then 4GB of memory with a 32bit
> OS since the use memory mapping to provide 4GB of logical memory to
> different running process which map to different physical memory addresses.
> Vista 32 bit like most if not all personnel computer Boss can not
> address more then 4GB since it does not use memory mapping.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Physical Address Extension? Buddha Vista General 3 04-03-2008 09:37 AM
physical Router address Dan Vista networking & sharing 18 01-16-2008 06:14 PM
Problem with Physical Address (MAC Address) MicroBoy Vista networking & sharing 10 07-25-2007 10:03 PM
Vista Retail Sales Higher than Expected ! FireWall2 Vista General 0 01-12-2007 03:13 PM
extension for address book M. Trussell Vista mail 2 09-11-2006 04:41 PM








Vistax64.com is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media 2005-2008

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50