Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Newsgroups > Vista performance & maintenance

Vista - Processor Power Management

Reply
 
Old 03-23-2009   #1 (permalink)


Vista Home Premium 32bit
 
 

Processor Power Management

After reading multiple articles on various site regarding how the processor power management works in Vista, I have yet to find a resolution to my current situation.

I am running Vista Home Premium 32bit on my HP Pavilion tx 2110 with an AMD X2 Mobile Tech TL-62 2.1Ghz and 3gb of RAM.

Whenever my laptop is unplugged from the wall and running on the battery, Vista seems to limit the processor frequency to 38% of the max (roughly 800mhz) no mater the power plan or processor load. While the computer is plugged in however, everything runs beautifully with the frequency at 100%.

Here is what the Resource Manager has to say about this:


The CPU graph on the left side is while the computer is plugged in, I believe I was reading some of the power management articles. The right side is after the power cord is removed, the spikes are when I was rendering a small fractal just to push the processor past idling.

Current power plan looks like this:


This is the default High Performance plan. Now from my understanding, while plugged in this should "force" the processor to maintain a 100% frequency regardless of the load while unplugging the cord should allow the cores to float anywhere between 5% and 100% load dependent, although this remains at 38% consistently.


What I would like it to do is whenever it is unplugged, it should retain either the 100% stable cap, or be allowed to range so that at high utilization the frequency may be allowed to range. Through messing with the "Minimum processor state" and "Maximum processor state" I have found that the 38% limit does not ever change, even if both setting are set to 15% or 100%, the while plugged in option however functions as it should, if I move the upper and lower limits it will mirror this change both in performance and in the resource manager.

Any suggestions on how to force my plan settings to take effect? Or is there a way to disable the power management and completely disallow processor states?

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-25-2009   #2 (permalink)
TheRealDeadApe


 
 

RE: Processor Power Management

You might try raising the minimum processor state or checking to see if there is a bios limit being imposed.


Post Originated from http://www.VistaForums.com Vista Support Forums
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-26-2009   #3 (permalink)


Vista home premium 64 bit
 
 

Re: Processor Power Management

There are 2 things to look for in the bios c1e state and also speedstep technology.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-26-2009   #4 (permalink)


Vista Home Premium 32bit
 
 

Re: Processor Power Management

Quote  Quote: Originally Posted by TheRealDeadApe View Post
You might try raising the minimum processor state or checking to see if there is a bios limit being imposed.


Post Originated from Windows Vista Forum Vista Support Forums
Quote  Quote: Originally Posted by roy69 View Post
There are 2 things to look for in the bios c1e state and also speedstep technology.
Checked in the bios (believe it is phoenix bios, very limited) and there is a power management option which limits the frequency based on whether or not it is plugged in. Changed that from the power saver to "Performance". Now I am capped at 76% frequency (1600 Mhz), great improvement. Changed the minimum now and it still caps to 76%, would like to be able to run at 100%, but at least now I meet the minimum system requirements for vista when I'm not plugged in.

Any other suggestions to completely release the cap?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-26-2009   #5 (permalink)
Ian D


 
 

Re: Processor Power Management


"luftwaffle" <guest@xxxxxx-email.com> wrote in message
news:e9d8d7258e965d20c7d457edbc833c51@xxxxxx-gateway.com...
Quote:

>
> TheRealDeadApe;1001706 Wrote:
Quote:

>> You might try raising the minimum processor state or checking to see if
>> there is a bios limit being imposed.
>>
>>
>> Post Originated from 'Windows Vista Forum' (http://www.VistaForums.com)
>> Vista Support Forums
>
> roy69;1001740 Wrote:
Quote:

>> There are 2 things to look for in the bios c1e state and also speedstep
>> technology.
>
> Checked in the bios (believe it is phoenix bios, very limited) and
> there is a power management option which limits the frequency based on
> whether or not it is plugged in. Changed that from the power saver to
> "Performance". Now I am capped at 76% frequency (1600 Mhz), great
> improvement. Changed the minimum now and it still caps to 76%, would
> like to be able to run at 100%, but at least now I meet the minimum
> system requirements for vista when I'm not plugged in.
>
> Any other suggestions to completely release the cap?
>
>
> --
> luftwaffle
I can't give any advice on how to achieve 100% of CPU
design frequency, but one thing to consider is that you
will now have shorter battery life for two reasons, one
being greater power consumption by the CPU, and the
other being increased cooling fan operation due to the
increased thermal load. This is probably of no concern,
unless there's an occasion where you need max battery
time, and then it's just a matter of adjusting the settings
back to default. I have found that, even with XP, you
can notice the difference between min/max clock speeds
when opening apps, switching windows, etc.



My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-27-2009   #6 (permalink)


Vista Home Premium 32bit
 
 

Re: Processor Power Management

Quote  Quote: Originally Posted by Ian D View Post
"luftwaffle" <guest@xxxxxx-email.com> wrote in message
news:e9d8d7258e965d20c7d457edbc833c51@xxxxxx-gateway.com...
Quote:

>
> TheRealDeadApe;1001706 Wrote:
Quote:

>> You might try raising the minimum processor state or checking to see if
>> there is a bios limit being imposed.
>>
>>
>> Post Originated from 'Windows Vista Forum' (Windows Vista Forum)
>> Vista Support Forums
>
> roy69;1001740 Wrote:
Quote:

>> There are 2 things to look for in the bios c1e state and also speedstep
>> technology.
>
> Checked in the bios (believe it is phoenix bios, very limited) and
> there is a power management option which limits the frequency based on
> whether or not it is plugged in. Changed that from the power saver to
> "Performance". Now I am capped at 76% frequency (1600 Mhz), great
> improvement. Changed the minimum now and it still caps to 76%, would
> like to be able to run at 100%, but at least now I meet the minimum
> system requirements for vista when I'm not plugged in.
>
> Any other suggestions to completely release the cap?
>
>
> --
> luftwaffle
I can't give any advice on how to achieve 100% of CPU
design frequency, but one thing to consider is that you
will now have shorter battery life for two reasons, one
being greater power consumption by the CPU, and the
other being increased cooling fan operation due to the
increased thermal load. This is probably of no concern,
unless there's an occasion where you need max battery
time, and then it's just a matter of adjusting the settings
back to default. I have found that, even with XP, you
can notice the difference between min/max clock speeds
when opening apps, switching windows, etc.

Battery life is a non issue, even on all power saving options I can "probably" browse the internet for, 2 hours maybe due to HPs terrible battery design. When I unplug my machine it is usually to head to my programming class compiling takes longer on low frequencies (of course) and still consumes the battery.

For now I'm happy with 1600mhz unplugged. Thanks to all that helped.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
processor power management features have been disabled due to a known firmware error EVENT ID 6 Vista General
Power Management/Power Options in Vista Vista General
What is minimum and maximum processor state in power management Vista performance & maintenance
Power Management Issues (Underclocked Processor) Vista performance & maintenance
Power Management Vista hardware & devices


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46