![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | How good is Vista's System Restore I have been using Symantec's GoBack for many years and it has saved my bacon on many occassions. But will not be available for Vista. I have been looking at Rollback RX which is supposed to be really good but you have problems defraging your hard disk. You have to uninstall rollback, defrag and then re-intsall and then you lose your restore points. So how good is Vista's system restore? Would I be able to bank on it in an emergency? Any thoughts and ideas would be appreciated. I did think of Acronis True Image as a companion, but was rreally looking for something along the lines of GoBack. Many thanks, Alan. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: How good is Vista's System Restore I use products from here. For the Backup I use Image for DOS. http://terabyteunlimited.com/ Good Luck. "Alan Robinson" <AlanRobinson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:A27327DD-FDF7-4182-8217-D56502BAC654@microsoft.com... >I have been using Symantec's GoBack for many years and it has saved my >bacon > on many occassions. But will not be available for Vista. I have been > looking > at Rollback RX which is supposed to be really good but you have problems > defraging your hard disk. You have to uninstall rollback, defrag and then > re-intsall and then you lose your restore points. So how good is Vista's > system restore? Would I be able to bank on it in an emergency? Any > thoughts > and ideas would be appreciated. I did think of Acronis True Image as a > companion, but was rreally looking for something along the lines of > GoBack. > Many thanks, > Alan. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: How good is Vista's System Restore I have uses Vista's full system restore and it works. That being said, I much prefer Acronis TrueImage HOME Edition 10.0 to image the system partition and then restore from the saved image. www.acronis.com -- Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Alan Robinson" <AlanRobinson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:A27327DD-FDF7-4182-8217-D56502BAC654@microsoft.com... >I have been using Symantec's GoBack for many years and it has saved my >bacon > on many occassions. But will not be available for Vista. I have been > looking > at Rollback RX which is supposed to be really good but you have problems > defraging your hard disk. You have to uninstall rollback, defrag and then > re-intsall and then you lose your restore points. So how good is Vista's > system restore? Would I be able to bank on it in an emergency? Any > thoughts > and ideas would be appreciated. I did think of Acronis True Image as a > companion, but was rreally looking for something along the lines of > GoBack. > Many thanks, > Alan. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: How good is Vista's System Restore Hi Alan, I would not recommend using rollback applications that were designed for XP, and nothing from Norton, who purchased GoBack. Previous version/Shadow Copy can be used to recover single files and folders. http://bertk.mvps.org/html/shadow.html System Restore in Windows Vista well for recovering from system problems. http://bertk.mvps.org/html/vista.html For Vista Business and Ultimate users there's Complete PC Backup. http://www.zdnet.com.au/insight/soft...9272295,00.htm For Vista Home users, Acronis True Image is a good choice. http://www.acronis.com/homecomputing/products/trueimage Regards, Bert Kinney MS-MVP Shell/User http://bertk.mvps.org Member: http://dts-l.org Alan Robinson wrote: > I have been using Symantec's GoBack for many years and it has saved my bacon > on many occassions. But will not be available for Vista. I have been looking > at Rollback RX which is supposed to be really good but you have problems > defraging your hard disk. You have to uninstall rollback, defrag and then > re-intsall and then you lose your restore points. So how good is Vista's > system restore? Would I be able to bank on it in an emergency? Any thoughts > and ideas would be appreciated. I did think of Acronis True Image as a > companion, but was rreally looking for something along the lines of GoBack. > Many thanks, > Alan. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: How good is Vista's System Restore "Alan Robinson" <AlanRobinson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:A27327DD-FDF7-4182-8217-D56502BAC654@microsoft.com... >I have been using Symantec's GoBack for many years and it has saved my >bacon > on many occassions. But will not be available for Vista. I have been > looking > at Rollback RX which is supposed to be really good but you have problems > defraging your hard disk. You have to uninstall rollback, defrag and then > re-intsall and then you lose your restore points. So how good is Vista's > system restore? Would I be able to bank on it in an emergency? Any > thoughts > and ideas would be appreciated. I did think of Acronis True Image as a > companion, but was rreally looking for something along the lines of > GoBack. > Many thanks, > Alan. I agree with Bert. The system restore in Vista uses Shadow Copy and is much more robust than the System Restore in XP. It is however only one part of a disaster recovery plan. It is not a substitute for a backup. I would avoid GoBack for any OS. -- Kerry Brown Microsoft MVP - Shell/User http://www.vistahelp.ca |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: How good is Vista's System Restore Alan Robinson wrote: > I have been using Symantec's GoBack for many years and it has saved > my bacon on many occassions. But will not be available for Vista. I > have been looking at Rollback RX which is supposed to be really good > but you have problems defraging your hard disk. You have to uninstall > rollback, defrag and then re-intsall and then you lose your restore > points. So how good is Vista's system restore? It's very good at what it does, but it does something different to what your post implies you think it does. VSS, System Restore, etc. are no substitute for a backup. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: How good is Vista's System Restore Windows Complete Backup and Restore is good, you might want to give it a try. Windows Vista has at least three different ways to backup for disaster: System Restore, Backup and Restore wizzard, and Windows Complete Backup and Restore. -- /* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Robert Firth * * Windows Vista x86 RTM * * http://www.WinVistaInfo.org * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */ "Alan Robinson" <AlanRobinson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:A27327DD-FDF7-4182-8217-D56502BAC654@microsoft.com... >I have been using Symantec's GoBack for many years and it has saved my >bacon > on many occassions. But will not be available for Vista. I have been > looking > at Rollback RX which is supposed to be really good but you have problems > defraging your hard disk. You have to uninstall rollback, defrag and then > re-intsall and then you lose your restore points. So how good is Vista's > system restore? Would I be able to bank on it in an emergency? Any > thoughts > and ideas would be appreciated. I did think of Acronis True Image as a > companion, but was rreally looking for something along the lines of > GoBack. > Many thanks, > Alan. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: How good is Vista's System Restore Unfortunately, CompletePC Backup is not available in all versions. It only comes in Business and Ultimate. -Michael "Robert Firth" <webmaster@winvistainfo.org> wrote in message news:F8A0C155-51F3-4833-A6AA-6D422E05E29C@microsoft.com... > Windows Complete Backup and Restore is good, you might want to give it a try. Windows Vista > has at least three different ways to backup for disaster: System Restore, Backup and Restore > wizzard, and Windows Complete Backup and Restore. > > -- > /* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > * Robert Firth * > * Windows Vista x86 RTM * > * http://www.WinVistaInfo.org * > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */ > > "Alan Robinson" <AlanRobinson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:A27327DD-FDF7-4182-8217-D56502BAC654@microsoft.com... >>I have been using Symantec's GoBack for many years and it has saved my bacon >> on many occassions. But will not be available for Vista. I have been looking >> at Rollback RX which is supposed to be really good but you have problems >> defraging your hard disk. You have to uninstall rollback, defrag and then >> re-intsall and then you lose your restore points. So how good is Vista's >> system restore? Would I be able to bank on it in an emergency? Any thoughts >> and ideas would be appreciated. I did think of Acronis True Image as a >> companion, but was rreally looking for something along the lines of GoBack. >> Many thanks, >> Alan. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: How good is Vista's System Restore While i agree Vista's complete PC Backup has its uses it isn't something i would rely on. From my experience of using it, it doesn't have any compression options, so if you are imaging (or shadow copying) a drive of, say 50GB, then you need 50GB available for the image. I haven't tried imaging to DVDs but, again, from other conversations, i gather that the 'restore' process for DVDs has to go in reverse order. In other words if you have disk 1 to 5, the you insert 5 first to get the restore going. Insert disk 1 first and Vista complains. There are far better third party imaging options available. As manu have said, Acronis is one, Paragon is another, so is casper. As for anything from Norton i'd bin it. They were good back in the Windows 95/98 era, but i find Norton applications nowadays cause more trouble than they actually cure. -- John Barnett MVP Associate Expert Windows Shell/User Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy, reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this mail/post.. "Ed." <ejs(at)zoom.net> wrote in message news:OGmsshLPHHA.324@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >I use products from here. For the Backup I use Image for DOS. > > http://terabyteunlimited.com/ > > Good Luck. > > "Alan Robinson" <AlanRobinson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:A27327DD-FDF7-4182-8217-D56502BAC654@microsoft.com... >>I have been using Symantec's GoBack for many years and it has saved my >>bacon >> on many occassions. But will not be available for Vista. I have been >> looking >> at Rollback RX which is supposed to be really good but you have problems >> defraging your hard disk. You have to uninstall rollback, defrag and then >> re-intsall and then you lose your restore points. So how good is Vista's >> system restore? Would I be able to bank on it in an emergency? Any >> thoughts >> and ideas would be appreciated. I did think of Acronis True Image as a >> companion, but was rreally looking for something along the lines of >> GoBack. >> Many thanks, >> Alan. > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: How good is Vista's System Restore >> While i agree Vista's complete PC Backup has its uses it isn't something >> i would rely on. From my experience of using it, it doesn't have any compression options, so if you are imaging (or shadow copying) a drive of, say 50GB, then you need 50GB available for the image. I haven't tried imaging to DVDs but, again, from other conversations, i gather that the 'restore' process for DVDs has to go in reverse order. In other words if you have disk 1 to 5, the you insert 5 first to get the restore going. Insert disk 1 first and Vista complains. There are far better third party imaging options available. As manu have said, Acronis is one, Paragon is another, so is casper. John: I have been evaluating the Acronis True Image 10.0 backup product. Very impressive product. As a test, I did a backup and restore of Vista RTM, all from within Vista RTM. No problems. Using the Normal compression setting: Op system vol: 9.2 GB used Compressed file size: 3.6GB |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vista's System Restore points format. | Vista General | |||
| Customize Vista's System Restore? | Vista General | |||
| Customize Vista's System Restore? | Vista file management | |||
| Customize Vista's System Restore? | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Settings Gone; System Restore Tried But No Good | Vista performance & maintenance | |||