Vista - Very Slow Bootup

After upgrading to Windows Vista Home Premium, I can't believe how slow it
takes for my Laptop to bootup. 5 minutes for booting upis rediculous. Any
suggestion out here?

"Anthony" <Anthony@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:4170BEF8-BF9D-4194-8495-77C6CCD2A52E@microsoft.com...

> After upgrading to Windows Vista Home Premium, I can't believe how slow it
> takes for my Laptop to bootup. 5 minutes for booting upis rediculous. Any
> suggestion out here?


It's on the long side, but I don't think it's ridiculous


My personal view is that the attention many people pay to how long it takes
to boot is unwarranted. Assuming that the computer's speed is otherwise
satisfactory, it may not be worth worrying about. Most people start their
computers once a day or even less frequently. In the overall scheme of
things, even a few minutes to start up isn't very important. Personally I
power on my computer when I get up in the morning, then go get my coffee.
When I come back, it's done booting. I don't know how long it took to boot
and I don't care.

However, if you want to address this anyway, it may be because of what
programs start automatically when you boot. On each program you don't want
to start automatically, check its Options to see if it has the choice not to
start. Many can easily and best be stopped that way. If that doesn't work,
run MSCONFIG from the Start | Run line, and on the Startup tab, uncheck the
programs you don't want to start automatically.



However, if I were you, I wouldn't do this just for the purpose of running
the minimum number of programs. Despite what many people tell you, you
should be concerned, not with how *many* of these programs you run, but
*which*. Some of them can hurt performance severely, but others have no
effect on performance.

Don't just stop programs from running willy-nilly. What you should do is
determine what each program is, what its value is to you, and what the cost
in performance is of its running all the time. You can get more information
about these with at http://castlecops.com/StartupList.html. If you can't
find it there, try Google searches and ask about specifics here.

Once you have that information, you can make an intelligent informed
decision about what you want to keep and what you want to get rid of.


--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup

I just wanted to know what causes this to happen. I think waiting 2 to 3
minutes to finally see the Microsoft meter that just sits there moving for a
couple of minutes and then watching a blank screen for another 5 minutes is
rediculous. When Windows XP booted up fully in 30 second.

"Ken Blake" wrote:

> "Anthony" <Anthony@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:4170BEF8-BF9D-4194-8495-77C6CCD2A52E@microsoft.com...
>
> > After upgrading to Windows Vista Home Premium, I can't believe how slow it
> > takes for my Laptop to bootup. 5 minutes for booting upis rediculous. Any
> > suggestion out here?
>
>
> It's on the long side, but I don't think it's ridiculous
>
>
> My personal view is that the attention many people pay to how long it takes
> to boot is unwarranted. Assuming that the computer's speed is otherwise
> satisfactory, it may not be worth worrying about. Most people start their
> computers once a day or even less frequently. In the overall scheme of
> things, even a few minutes to start up isn't very important. Personally I
> power on my computer when I get up in the morning, then go get my coffee.
> When I come back, it's done booting. I don't know how long it took to boot
> and I don't care.
>
> However, if you want to address this anyway, it may be because of what
> programs start automatically when you boot. On each program you don't want
> to start automatically, check its Options to see if it has the choice not to
> start. Many can easily and best be stopped that way. If that doesn't work,
> run MSCONFIG from the Start | Run line, and on the Startup tab, uncheck the
> programs you don't want to start automatically.
>
>
>
> However, if I were you, I wouldn't do this just for the purpose of running
> the minimum number of programs. Despite what many people tell you, you
> should be concerned, not with how *many* of these programs you run, but
> *which*. Some of them can hurt performance severely, but others have no
> effect on performance.
>
> Don't just stop programs from running willy-nilly. What you should do is
> determine what each program is, what its value is to you, and what the cost
> in performance is of its running all the time. You can get more information
> about these with at http://castlecops.com/StartupList.html. If you can't
> find it there, try Google searches and ask about specifics here.
>
> Once you have that information, you can make an intelligent informed
> decision about what you want to keep and what you want to get rid of.
>
>
> --
> Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> Please reply to the newsgroup
>
>
>

"Anthony" <Anthony@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news4D3BE05-929F-48A0-9752-8FBE05A74F3D@microsoft.com...

>I just wanted to know what causes this to happen. I think waiting 2 to 3
> minutes to finally see the Microsoft meter that just sits there moving for
> a
> couple of minutes and then watching a blank screen for another 5 minutes
> is
> rediculous.


I think sitting there and watching it is ridiculous too. As I said, I go get
my coffee and don't sit around watching.. But if you want to watch, it's
your choice.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup



When Windows XP booted up fully in 30 second.
>
> "Ken Blake" wrote:
>
>> "Anthony" <Anthony@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:4170BEF8-BF9D-4194-8495-77C6CCD2A52E@microsoft.com...
>>
>> > After upgrading to Windows Vista Home Premium, I can't believe how slow
>> > it
>> > takes for my Laptop to bootup. 5 minutes for booting upis rediculous.
>> > Any
>> > suggestion out here?
>>
>>
>> It's on the long side, but I don't think it's ridiculous
>>
>>
>> My personal view is that the attention many people pay to how long it
>> takes
>> to boot is unwarranted. Assuming that the computer's speed is otherwise
>> satisfactory, it may not be worth worrying about. Most people start their
>> computers once a day or even less frequently. In the overall scheme of
>> things, even a few minutes to start up isn't very important. Personally I
>> power on my computer when I get up in the morning, then go get my coffee.
>> When I come back, it's done booting. I don't know how long it took to
>> boot
>> and I don't care.
>>
>> However, if you want to address this anyway, it may be because of what
>> programs start automatically when you boot. On each program you don't
>> want
>> to start automatically, check its Options to see if it has the choice not
>> to
>> start. Many can easily and best be stopped that way. If that doesn't
>> work,
>> run MSCONFIG from the Start | Run line, and on the Startup tab, uncheck
>> the
>> programs you don't want to start automatically.
>>
>>
>>
>> However, if I were you, I wouldn't do this just for the purpose of
>> running
>> the minimum number of programs. Despite what many people tell you, you
>> should be concerned, not with how *many* of these programs you run, but
>> *which*. Some of them can hurt performance severely, but others have no
>> effect on performance.
>>
>> Don't just stop programs from running willy-nilly. What you should do is
>> determine what each program is, what its value is to you, and what the
>> cost
>> in performance is of its running all the time. You can get more
>> information
>> about these with at http://castlecops.com/StartupList.html. If you can't
>> find it there, try Google searches and ask about specifics here.
>>
>> Once you have that information, you can make an intelligent informed
>> decision about what you want to keep and what you want to get rid of.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
>> Please reply to the newsgroup
>>
>>
>>