Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Newsgroups > Vista performance & maintenance

Vista - DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP

Reply
 
Old 08-30-2007   #1 (permalink)
William


 
 

DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP

I bought a new Dell laptop when Vista first came out and after struggling with
this very slick operating system, I am ready to throw in the towel and install
XP. My main complaint is poor performance. I've stripped away most of the slick
features that ate into the performance of my machine and still I am unsatisfied.
Needless to say, I have made all the modifications I could find in the various
newsgroups and Internet websites which promised a Vista performance boost, but I
am still disappointed. Am I missing something here or is flash all that most
people appreciate?
-Bill


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-30-2007   #2 (permalink)
f/fgeorge


 
 

Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:42:07 -0400, "William" <wyum@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

>I bought a new Dell laptop when Vista first came out and after struggling with
>this very slick operating system, I am ready to throw in the towel and install
>XP. My main complaint is poor performance. I've stripped away most of the slick
>features that ate into the performance of my machine and still I am unsatisfied.
>Needless to say, I have made all the modifications I could find in the various
>newsgroups and Internet websites which promised a Vista performance boost, but I
>am still disappointed. Am I missing something here or is flash all that most
>people appreciate?
>-Bill
Add more memory, most systems come with 512 or even 1 meg of memory.
Going to 2 meg of memory will make a HUGE difference!
Also stop shouting, all caps is considered shouting.
Thanks
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-30-2007   #3 (permalink)
William


 
 

Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP


"f/fgeorge" <ffgeorge@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8d9ed350l056vri0b6eq4ig250l99b78db@xxxxxx
Quote:

> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:42:07 -0400, "William" <wyum@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
Quote:

>>I bought a new Dell laptop when Vista first came out and after struggling with
>>this very slick operating system, I am ready to throw in the towel and install
>>XP. My main complaint is poor performance. I've stripped away most of the
>>slick
>>features that ate into the performance of my machine and still I am
>>unsatisfied.
>>Needless to say, I have made all the modifications I could find in the various
>>newsgroups and Internet websites which promised a Vista performance boost, but
>>I
>>am still disappointed. Am I missing something here or is flash all that most
>>people appreciate?
>>-Bill
Quote:

> Add more memory, most systems come with 512 or even 1 meg of memory.
> Going to 2 meg of memory will make a HUGE difference!
> Also stop shouting, all caps is considered shouting.
> Thanks
Like I said, "I have made all the modifications...", and my laptop already had
2GB of RAM. I guess it depends on what one does with the computer and what kind
of performance one is used to. -Bill
PS. The "shouting" was done on purpose, to make a point and not to be rude.
Scolding a newsgroup user IS rude!

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-30-2007   #4 (permalink)
David


 
 

Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP

William, I doubt we'll ever see the words "fast" and "Vista" used in the
same breath. I wonder if I'll live long enough to see ANY OS come out
of Redmond that runs faster than it's predessors. Boy, can u just
IMAGINE how fast DOS 6.22 would be on a modern PC?? We could bring up
Lotus 1-2-3 in .0001 seconds! LOL.

I like the look of Vista, but I too am disappointed with it's various
"warts". Like 'search' for example. It does not work as advertised, as
I've mentioned on MPWVG. I certainly would never consider replacing an
XP installation with Vista. That would be lunacy, IMHO.

Dave
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-30-2007   #5 (permalink)
David


 
 

Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP

Quote:

> enough to see ANY OS come out of Redmond that runs faster than it's
> predessors. Boy, can u just IMAGINE
LOL. make that "predecessor"

Dave
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-30-2007   #6 (permalink)
AJR


 
 

Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP

William - I have installed several versions of Vista (Home Premium and
Ultimate) and am very sastisifed.

The statement "...My main complaint is poor performance..." is very general
and cannot be address logically - please do not expect readers to "read
between the lines" - are you referring to slow boot, shutdown, apllication
installation and/or running, sound and/or video performance and so forth.



"William" <wyum@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23isgk3z6HHA.5360@xxxxxx
Quote:

>I bought a new Dell laptop when Vista first came out and after struggling
>with this very slick operating system, I am ready to throw in the towel and
>install XP. My main complaint is poor performance. I've stripped away most
>of the slick features that ate into the performance of my machine and still
>I am unsatisfied. Needless to say, I have made all the modifications I
>could find in the various newsgroups and Internet websites which promised a
>Vista performance boost, but I am still disappointed. Am I missing
>something here or is flash all that most people appreciate?
> -Bill

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-30-2007   #7 (permalink)
Kurt Herman


 
 

Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP

Vista runs faster in ALL aspects on my machine then XP ever did. Mostly
because of improved memory management, and off loading the desktop to the
GPU.

Kurt

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-30-2007   #8 (permalink)
David


 
 

Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP

Kurt Herman wrote:
Quote:

> Vista runs faster in ALL aspects on my machine then XP ever did.
> Mostly because of improved memory management, and off loading the
> desktop to the GPU.
>
> Kurt
that's the FIRST comment of that nature I have run across regarding
Vista vs XP. Amazing!!!

Dave
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-30-2007   #9 (permalink)
William


 
 

Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP

Let me make it clear for those who do not want to accept the generalization
"poor performance". In your multiple choice question below, I must respond with,
all of the above.

I compare a fully loaded Vista/Dell Core2 Duo laptop to a XP/Dell P3/3.6Ghz
desktop to a W2k/Dell P3/1Ghz desktop. I use all three computers on a regular
basis, which are connected to the same network and running most of the same or
similar software and database. The XP runs most everything in the blink of an
eye, the W2K somewhat slower but still amazingly fast for a machine that is 7
years old (perhaps a blink and a half). The Vista on the other hand, although
fun to use, awesome features and graphics, Aero, Transparency etc. but
performance wise, it's a dog. I find myself twiddling my thumbs waiting for
things to happen. Depending on the application I am running, it can run from
simply a bit on the sluggish side to downright annoying.

You may want to say this is not a very scientific or accurate assessment or
study of Vista as an operating system, but it is MY impression of Vista after
using it for six months. Add to the performance issues are the many bugs that
are inherent in a new O/S, I am surprised that Microsoft is able to sell this
product all together. How on earth the new computer user is managing with Vista
is beyond my understanding. I think Dell has already recognized this as their
entire business line of computers is available with either XP or Vista
installed. And as a matter of fact, Dell recommends Microsoft XP in their XPS
720's as performance is paramount in those high end gaming models. I think Dell
is the only computer company to continue offering XP in their computers.

There are a lot of other issues with Vista that are well beyond the scope of
this posting. I am disappointed, that's all. -Bill


"AJR" <ajrjdr@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23zUIDC16HHA.1188@xxxxxx
Quote:

> William - I have installed several versions of Vista (Home Premium and
> Ultimate) and am very sastisifed.
>
> The statement "...My main complaint is poor performance..." is very general
> and cannot be address logically - please do not expect readers to "read
> between the lines" - are you referring to slow boot, shutdown, apllication
> installation and/or running, sound and/or video performance and so forth.
>
>
>
> "William" <wyum@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23isgk3z6HHA.5360@xxxxxx
Quote:

>>I bought a new Dell laptop when Vista first came out and after struggling with
>>this very slick operating system, I am ready to throw in the towel and install
>>XP. My main complaint is poor performance. I've stripped away most of the
>>slick features that ate into the performance of my machine and still I am
>>unsatisfied. Needless to say, I have made all the modifications I could find
>>in the various newsgroups and Internet websites which promised a Vista
>>performance boost, but I am still disappointed. Am I missing something here or
>>is flash all that most people appreciate?
>> -Bill
>
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-30-2007   #10 (permalink)
William


 
 

Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP

Hah hah hah, yeah, Dave. Kurt must be on the Microsoft payroll or he was running
XP on an Apple.
-Bill

"David" <david@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8PCdnX_esK3P-krbnZ2dnUVZ_ubinZ2d@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Kurt Herman wrote:
Quote:

>> Vista runs faster in ALL aspects on my machine then XP ever did. Mostly
>> because of improved memory management, and off loading the desktop to the
>> GPU.
>>
>> Kurt
> that's the FIRST comment of that nature I have run across regarding Vista vs
> XP. Amazing!!!
>
> Dave
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Disappointing performance. What gives? General Discussion
So far disappointing....... Vista General
Disappointing performance with new computer and Windows Vista Vista performance & maintenance
Vista very disappointing Vista performance & maintenance
Vista.... Very Disappointing Vista General


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46