![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP I bought a new Dell laptop when Vista first came out and after struggling with this very slick operating system, I am ready to throw in the towel and install XP. My main complaint is poor performance. I've stripped away most of the slick features that ate into the performance of my machine and still I am unsatisfied. Needless to say, I have made all the modifications I could find in the various newsgroups and Internet websites which promised a Vista performance boost, but I am still disappointed. Am I missing something here or is flash all that most people appreciate? -Bill |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:42:07 -0400, "William" <wyum@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >I bought a new Dell laptop when Vista first came out and after struggling with >this very slick operating system, I am ready to throw in the towel and install >XP. My main complaint is poor performance. I've stripped away most of the slick >features that ate into the performance of my machine and still I am unsatisfied. >Needless to say, I have made all the modifications I could find in the various >newsgroups and Internet websites which promised a Vista performance boost, but I >am still disappointed. Am I missing something here or is flash all that most >people appreciate? >-Bill Going to 2 meg of memory will make a HUGE difference! Also stop shouting, all caps is considered shouting. Thanks |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP "f/fgeorge" <ffgeorge@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:8d9ed350l056vri0b6eq4ig250l99b78db@xxxxxx Quote: > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:42:07 -0400, "William" <wyum@xxxxxx> wrote: > Quote: >>I bought a new Dell laptop when Vista first came out and after struggling with >>this very slick operating system, I am ready to throw in the towel and install >>XP. My main complaint is poor performance. I've stripped away most of the >>slick >>features that ate into the performance of my machine and still I am >>unsatisfied. >>Needless to say, I have made all the modifications I could find in the various >>newsgroups and Internet websites which promised a Vista performance boost, but >>I >>am still disappointed. Am I missing something here or is flash all that most >>people appreciate? >>-Bill Quote: > Add more memory, most systems come with 512 or even 1 meg of memory. > Going to 2 meg of memory will make a HUGE difference! > Also stop shouting, all caps is considered shouting. > Thanks 2GB of RAM. I guess it depends on what one does with the computer and what kind of performance one is used to. -Bill PS. The "shouting" was done on purpose, to make a point and not to be rude. Scolding a newsgroup user IS rude! |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP William, I doubt we'll ever see the words "fast" and "Vista" used in the same breath. I wonder if I'll live long enough to see ANY OS come out of Redmond that runs faster than it's predessors. Boy, can u just IMAGINE how fast DOS 6.22 would be on a modern PC?? We could bring up Lotus 1-2-3 in .0001 seconds! LOL. I like the look of Vista, but I too am disappointed with it's various "warts". Like 'search' for example. It does not work as advertised, as I've mentioned on MPWVG. I certainly would never consider replacing an XP installation with Vista. That would be lunacy, IMHO. Dave |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP Quote: > enough to see ANY OS come out of Redmond that runs faster than it's > predessors. Boy, can u just IMAGINE Dave |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP William - I have installed several versions of Vista (Home Premium and Ultimate) and am very sastisifed. The statement "...My main complaint is poor performance..." is very general and cannot be address logically - please do not expect readers to "read between the lines" - are you referring to slow boot, shutdown, apllication installation and/or running, sound and/or video performance and so forth. "William" <wyum@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23isgk3z6HHA.5360@xxxxxx Quote: >I bought a new Dell laptop when Vista first came out and after struggling >with this very slick operating system, I am ready to throw in the towel and >install XP. My main complaint is poor performance. I've stripped away most >of the slick features that ate into the performance of my machine and still >I am unsatisfied. Needless to say, I have made all the modifications I >could find in the various newsgroups and Internet websites which promised a >Vista performance boost, but I am still disappointed. Am I missing >something here or is flash all that most people appreciate? > -Bill |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP Vista runs faster in ALL aspects on my machine then XP ever did. Mostly because of improved memory management, and off loading the desktop to the GPU. Kurt |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP Kurt Herman wrote: Quote: > Vista runs faster in ALL aspects on my machine then XP ever did. > Mostly because of improved memory management, and off loading the > desktop to the GPU. > > Kurt Vista vs XP. Amazing!!! Dave |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP Let me make it clear for those who do not want to accept the generalization "poor performance". In your multiple choice question below, I must respond with, all of the above. I compare a fully loaded Vista/Dell Core2 Duo laptop to a XP/Dell P3/3.6Ghz desktop to a W2k/Dell P3/1Ghz desktop. I use all three computers on a regular basis, which are connected to the same network and running most of the same or similar software and database. The XP runs most everything in the blink of an eye, the W2K somewhat slower but still amazingly fast for a machine that is 7 years old (perhaps a blink and a half). The Vista on the other hand, although fun to use, awesome features and graphics, Aero, Transparency etc. but performance wise, it's a dog. I find myself twiddling my thumbs waiting for things to happen. Depending on the application I am running, it can run from simply a bit on the sluggish side to downright annoying. You may want to say this is not a very scientific or accurate assessment or study of Vista as an operating system, but it is MY impression of Vista after using it for six months. Add to the performance issues are the many bugs that are inherent in a new O/S, I am surprised that Microsoft is able to sell this product all together. How on earth the new computer user is managing with Vista is beyond my understanding. I think Dell has already recognized this as their entire business line of computers is available with either XP or Vista installed. And as a matter of fact, Dell recommends Microsoft XP in their XPS 720's as performance is paramount in those high end gaming models. I think Dell is the only computer company to continue offering XP in their computers. There are a lot of other issues with Vista that are well beyond the scope of this posting. I am disappointed, that's all. -Bill "AJR" <ajrjdr@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23zUIDC16HHA.1188@xxxxxx Quote: > William - I have installed several versions of Vista (Home Premium and > Ultimate) and am very sastisifed. > > The statement "...My main complaint is poor performance..." is very general > and cannot be address logically - please do not expect readers to "read > between the lines" - are you referring to slow boot, shutdown, apllication > installation and/or running, sound and/or video performance and so forth. > > > > "William" <wyum@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:%23isgk3z6HHA.5360@xxxxxx Quote: >>I bought a new Dell laptop when Vista first came out and after struggling with >>this very slick operating system, I am ready to throw in the towel and install >>XP. My main complaint is poor performance. I've stripped away most of the >>slick features that ate into the performance of my machine and still I am >>unsatisfied. Needless to say, I have made all the modifications I could find >>in the various newsgroups and Internet websites which promised a Vista >>performance boost, but I am still disappointed. Am I missing something here or >>is flash all that most people appreciate? >> -Bill > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: DISAPPOINTING PERFORMANCE - BACK TO XP Hah hah hah, yeah, Dave. Kurt must be on the Microsoft payroll or he was running XP on an Apple. -Bill "David" <david@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:8PCdnX_esK3P-krbnZ2dnUVZ_ubinZ2d@xxxxxx Quote: > Kurt Herman wrote: Quote: >> Vista runs faster in ALL aspects on my machine then XP ever did. Mostly >> because of improved memory management, and off loading the desktop to the >> GPU. >> >> Kurt > XP. Amazing!!! > > Dave |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Disappointing performance. What gives? | General Discussion | |||
| So far disappointing....... | Vista General | |||
| Disappointing performance with new computer and Windows Vista | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Vista very disappointing | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Vista.... Very Disappointing | Vista General | |||