![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Vista Versions - Performance Comparison I'm running Vista Ultimate on a T43 Thinkpad with 2 ghz Pentium M and 1.5 gigs of RAM. Performance is not great and since I have access to Vista Business I'm curious if I would notice any difference switching from Ultimate to Business. Has anyone done any performance comparisons between the different versions of Vista or are they all the same? I'm just wondering if removing some of the Ultimate bloat might make a difference in performance? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Versions - Performance Comparison All versions of Windows Vista run and perform equally well. Please define specifically what you mean by "bloat" as that term is meaningless when used in generalities. Open Device Manager (its in the Control Panel) and then right-click on your hard drive (under Disk Drives). Click on "Policies" and make sure there are check marks next to "Optimize for Performance", "Enable write caching on the disk", and "Enable advanced performance", then click OK. Next, perform a Disk Cleanup: Click on the blue Vista start button and then on the Computer entry in the Start Menu. Right-click on your hard drive and select Properties > Disk Cleanup > Files from all users..... More Options > Clean Up (System Restore and Shadow Copies). -- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User -------------------------------------------------------------------- "Kevin Young" wrote: I'm running Vista Ultimate on a T43 Thinkpad with 2 ghz Pentium M and 1.5 gigs of RAM. Performance is not great and since I have access to Vista Business I'm curious if I would notice any difference switching from Ultimate to Business. Has anyone done any performance comparisons between the different versions of Vista or are they all the same? I'm just wondering if removing some of the Ultimate bloat might make a difference in performance? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Versions - Performance Comparison On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:27:58 -0600, Kevin Young <KY.NNTP@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > I'm running Vista Ultimate on a T43 Thinkpad with 2 ghz Pentium M and > 1.5 gigs of RAM. Performance is not great and since I have access to > Vista Business I'm curious if I would notice any difference switching > from Ultimate to Business. No. Quote: > Has anyone done any performance comparisons > between the different versions of Vista or are they all the same? Performance among the different editions is essentially the same, assuming that you have the same features enabled Quote: > I'm > just wondering if removing some of the Ultimate bloat might make a > difference in performance? Bloat? The difference between Business and Ultimate is what features come with each. For example, Ultimate comes with Media Center features and Business doesn't. However if you don't use those Media Center features, there is *no* performance penalty involved with having them available on your hard drive. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Vista x64 Ultimate SP2, Windows 7 Ultimate x64 | Re: Vista Versions - Performance Comparison You might try these tips to speed up the performance of Vista. Speed Up the Performance of Vista Shawn |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Versions - Performance Comparison Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote: Quote: > All versions of Windows Vista run and perform equally well. > Please define specifically what you mean by "bloat" as that > term is meaningless when used in generalities. > > Open Device Manager (its in the Control Panel) and then > right-click on your hard drive (under Disk Drives). Click > on "Policies" and make sure there are check marks next to > "Optimize for Performance", "Enable write caching on > the disk", and "Enable advanced performance", then click OK. > > Next, perform a Disk Cleanup: > > Click on the blue Vista start button and then on the Computer > entry in the Start Menu. Right-click on your hard drive and > select Properties > Disk Cleanup > Files from all users..... > More Options > Clean Up (System Restore and Shadow Copies). > referring to Windows Media Centre which I don't really use all that much on the laptop. In addition to your suggestions I've also disabled Bitlocker and hopefully I'll notice an improvement. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Versions - Performance Comparison Ken Blake, MVP wrote: Quote: > On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:27:58 -0600, Kevin Young <KY.NNTP@xxxxxx> > wrote: > Quote: >> I'm running Vista Ultimate on a T43 Thinkpad with 2 ghz Pentium M and >> 1.5 gigs of RAM. Performance is not great and since I have access to >> Vista Business I'm curious if I would notice any difference switching >> from Ultimate to Business. > > No. > > Quote: >> Has anyone done any performance comparisons >> between the different versions of Vista or are they all the same? > > Performance among the different editions is essentially the same, > assuming that you have the same features enabled > > Quote: >> I'm >> just wondering if removing some of the Ultimate bloat might make a >> difference in performance? > > Bloat? The difference between Business and Ultimate is what features > come with each. For example, Ultimate comes with Media Center features > and Business doesn't. However if you don't use those Media Center > features, there is *no* performance penalty involved with having them > available on your hard drive. > suggestions Carey provided and hopefully they will help. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Versions - Performance Comparison If you're not using Media Center, all it does is take up hard drive space. It does not consume memory, CPU cycles or resources if unused. Carey's response is spot-on, there will be no real difference in performance between versions of Vista given the assumption that all are configured the same. -- Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@xxxxxx * NEW! Catch my blog ... http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/ * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups * The Website - http://rgharper.mvps.org/ * HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm "Kevin Young" <KY.NNTP@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:OHmk5tk$HHA.3400@xxxxxx Quote: > Thanks for the suggestions Carey I'll give them a try. By bloat I was > referring to Windows Media Centre which I don't really use all that much > on the laptop. In addition to your suggestions I've also disabled > Bitlocker and hopefully I'll notice an improvement. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Versions - Performance Comparison On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:39:38 -0600, Kevin Young <KY.NNTP@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > Ken Blake, MVP wrote: Quote: > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:27:58 -0600, Kevin Young <KY.NNTP@xxxxxx> > > wrote: > > Quote: > >> I'm running Vista Ultimate on a T43 Thinkpad with 2 ghz Pentium M and > >> 1.5 gigs of RAM. Performance is not great and since I have access to > >> Vista Business I'm curious if I would notice any difference switching > >> from Ultimate to Business. > > > > No. > > > > Quote: > >> Has anyone done any performance comparisons > >> between the different versions of Vista or are they all the same? > > > > Performance among the different editions is essentially the same, > > assuming that you have the same features enabled > > > > Quote: > >> I'm > >> just wondering if removing some of the Ultimate bloat might make a > >> difference in performance? > > > > Bloat? The difference between Business and Ultimate is what features > > come with each. For example, Ultimate comes with Media Center features > > and Business doesn't. However if you don't use those Media Center > > features, there is *no* performance penalty involved with having them > > available on your hard drive. > > > Thanks Ken, it was Media Center I was thinking of. You're welcome. Glad to help. Quote: > I'm trying the > suggestions Carey provided and hopefully they will help. Good! -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Versions - Performance Comparison "Carey Frisch [MVP]" <cnfrisch@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:4C46759E-7942-42F0-A747-95A614078367@xxxxxx Quote: > All versions of Windows Vista run and perform equally well. > Please define specifically what you mean by "bloat" as that > term is meaningless when used in generalities. > > Open Device Manager (its in the Control Panel) and then > right-click on your hard drive (under Disk Drives). Click > on "Policies" and make sure there are check marks next to > "Optimize for Performance", "Enable write caching on > the disk", and "Enable advanced performance", then click OK. tried to do just what you described but the settings never remain . After checking the boxes, if I view the properties again they are unchecked. I am an admin so I din't know why there would be a problem. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Virtual machines performance comparison | Vista General | |||
| OEM versions and Full Versions of Vista | Vista installation & setup | |||
| Performance differences between different Vista versions? | Vista General | |||
| Where do I find a DETAILED comparison of the Vista Versions? | Vista General | |||
| Side-by-Side Comparison of Vista Versions | Vista General | |||