![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Optimal PrinterSettings Within Vista? I am using Vista SP1 with an Epson RX595 printer. I am an architectural photographer, and was truly stunned by the quality of the prints I was seeing until I recently did a clean install of Vista. Using the exact same photograph, same paper, with the same settings in the Epson printer software.....apples to apples........there is now a noticeable difference in the print quality. Coarser, and there are areas where the details aren't as filled in as they were before (halos around window frames of building in distance) is the best way I can describe it. My guess is that there is a setting within Vista's printer properties that isn't the same as it was previously. Can anyone tell me where I can find the recommended settings for optimal print quality? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Optimal PrinterSettings Within Vista? It may be that there is a difference in printer drivers. Vista and windows 7 come with many printer drivers, but the drivers are usually "basic" drivers, so it's often necessary to use downloaded drivers from the OEM's web site to fully utilize the printer's features. Then, you get into the application settings, printer driver settings(look here first), and so forth. Vista and windows 7 also have improved (more complex) "color management". If not set up properly, it can cause problems as well. You may have inadvertently set something (camera, windows, application, printing options, photo file type, compression,etc.) that reduces the quality of the printed photo. Without knowing exactly how you go about printing photos, it's hard to give you any specific advice. In the years that I've used windows to print photos, major improvements have occurred, notably with printer output quality and speed. A confusion factor that also has arisen has to do with the "DPI" of a printer versus the photo file's pixel count. They are NOT the same. A printer with decent drivers can print a photo file in multiple sizes. This means that the printer software can add or remove "dots" to make the photo file "fit" to the proper dimensions. This obviously will have an effect on printed quality. (And so on) Source for current drivers. http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/s...ession.new=Yes "DaveGF" <DaveGF@newsgroup> wrote in message news:3B94A351-33AD-4CF0-B1EF-C4D6C8D78C8C@newsgroup Quote: >I am using Vista SP1 with an Epson RX595 printer. I am an architectural > photographer, and was truly stunned by the quality of the prints I was > seeing > until I recently did a clean install of Vista. Using the exact same > photograph, same paper, with the same settings in the Epson printer > software.....apples to apples........there is now a noticeable difference > in > the print quality. Coarser, and there are areas where the details aren't > as > filled in as they were before (halos around window frames of building in > distance) is the best way I can describe it. > > My guess is that there is a setting within Vista's printer properties that > isn't the same as it was previously. Can anyone tell me where I can find > the > recommended settings for optimal print quality? |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Enable or Disable Optimal Performance in Local Area Connection Pro | Vista networking & sharing | |||
| -LiteralPath is a less than optimal solution | PowerShell | |||
| How is optimal CPU frequency computed in Vista? | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Two SATA drive optimal configuration | Vista performance & maintenance | |||