Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Newsgroups > Vista security

Vista - Concurrent Anti-Spyware

Reply
 
Old 10-31-2007   #1 (permalink)
Iain


 
 

Concurrent Anti-Spyware

Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently
are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware?

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-31-2007   #2 (permalink)
peter


 
 

Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware

no

pk
"Iain" <iain@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5ortipFnlpfbU1@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently are
> forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-31-2007   #3 (permalink)
Charlie42


 
 

Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware

Iain <iain@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes
> concurrently are forbidden, does the same hold true for
> anti-spyware?
It's not forbidden, but you shouldn't run two anti-virus programs (or
two firewalls for that matter) at the same time, since they may conflict
and even cause crashes.

As for anti-spyware, it's the other way around. No single anti-spyware
program has a good enough detection rate, it is therefore recommended to
run at least two, hoping that the second program picks up what the first
didn't and vice versa. Conflicts are not a big issue with these
programs.

Charlie42

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-31-2007   #4 (permalink)
GTS


 
 

Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware

There's no harm, in fact it's advisable, to run occasional scans with
multiple spyware tools. Running multiple resident programs, however, may
cause conflicts and performance problems.
--

"Iain" <iain@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5ortipFnlpfbU1@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently are
> forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 11-02-2007   #5 (permalink)
Hank Arnold (MVP)


 
 

Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware

Iain wrote:
Quote:

> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently
> are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware?
Not at all. I'd be careful about running multiple programs monitoring
real time (mostly because of the resources used), but scanning for
spyware with multiple scanners is not only allowed, it's still
considered a "best practice"...

--

Regards,
Hank Arnold
Microsoft MVP
Windows Server - Directory Services
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 11-02-2007   #6 (permalink)
Straight Talk


 
 

Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:14:48 -0400, "Hank Arnold (MVP)"
<rasilon@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

>Iain wrote:
Quote:

>> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently
>> are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware?
>
>Not at all. I'd be careful about running multiple programs monitoring
>real time (mostly because of the resources used), but scanning for
>spyware with multiple scanners is not only allowed, it's still
>considered a "best practice"...
No. It's considered "nonsense" - like any "scanning" for malware in an
up-and-running environment is.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 11-02-2007   #7 (permalink)
Doug


 
 

Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware

"Straight Talk" <b__nice@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5k0mi3lpqmu8o7j3os5jh06vmjd565bfkv@xxxxxx
Quote:

> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:14:48 -0400, "Hank Arnold (MVP)"
> <rasilon@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
Quote:

>>Iain wrote:
Quote:

>>> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently
>>> are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware?
>>
>>Not at all. I'd be careful about running multiple programs monitoring
>>real time (mostly because of the resources used), but scanning for
>>spyware with multiple scanners is not only allowed, it's still
>>considered a "best practice"...
>
> No. It's considered "nonsense" - like any "scanning" for malware in an
> up-and-running environment is.
Your advice is therefore?

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 11-02-2007   #8 (permalink)
Straight Talk


 
 

Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware

On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:26:20 -0000, "Doug"
<just_me@xxxxxx_address.replytogroup> wrote:
Quote:

>"Straight Talk" <b__nice@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:5k0mi3lpqmu8o7j3os5jh06vmjd565bfkv@xxxxxx
Quote:

>> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:14:48 -0400, "Hank Arnold (MVP)"
>> <rasilon@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
Quote:

>>>Iain wrote:
>>>> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently
>>>> are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware?
>>>
>>>Not at all. I'd be careful about running multiple programs monitoring
>>>real time (mostly because of the resources used), but scanning for
>>>spyware with multiple scanners is not only allowed, it's still
>>>considered a "best practice"...
>>
>> No. It's considered "nonsense" - like any "scanning" for malware in an
>> up-and-running environment is.
>
>Your advice is therefore?
Simple. Don't install it in the first place.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 11-03-2007   #9 (permalink)
Doug


 
 

Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware


"Straight Talk" <b__nice@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:s6imi3tc1nk2rs58l3qlr2fmcvq8ksvnlm@xxxxxx
Quote:

> On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:26:20 -0000, "Doug"
> <just_me@xxxxxx_address.replytogroup> wrote:
>
Quote:

>>"Straight Talk" <b__nice@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:5k0mi3lpqmu8o7j3os5jh06vmjd565bfkv@xxxxxx
Quote:

>>> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:14:48 -0400, "Hank Arnold (MVP)"
>>> <rasilon@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Iain wrote:
>>>>> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently
>>>>> are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware?
>>>>
>>>>Not at all. I'd be careful about running multiple programs monitoring
>>>>real time (mostly because of the resources used), but scanning for
>>>>spyware with multiple scanners is not only allowed, it's still
>>>>considered a "best practice"...
>>>
>>> No. It's considered "nonsense" - like any "scanning" for malware in an
>>> up-and-running environment is.
>>
>>Your advice is therefore?
>
> Simple. Don't install it in the first place.
Please clarify. If by "it" you refer to the malware, it installs itself
unbidden! How should I keep it out? If by "it" you refer to anti-spyware
software, are you saying that its use is a bad idea and that spyware should
be left unmolested? Or is it that periodic manual purges are OK but that
spyware blocking in real time messes up the up-and-running environment?

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 11-04-2007   #10 (permalink)
Straight Talk


 
 

Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware

On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 08:17:27 -0000, "Doug"
<just_me@xxxxxx_address.replytogroup> wrote:
Quote:

>Please clarify. If by "it" you refer to the malware, it installs itself
>unbidden!
Of course it (malware) doesn't. It just doesn't magically appear.
Quote:

>How should I keep it out?
By not installing all kinds of crappy software from questionable
sources and by running not inherently broken software like IE.

Malware is primarily caused by user's lack of knowledge/care and buggy
software.

BTW, how bad is the malware-situation on Vista anyway?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Malware Detections of Free Anti-Malware/Anti-Spyware System Security
anti-spyware Vista security
What Anti Spyware? Vista General
System Health report - SP1 - Anti Spyware and Anti Virus not recognised as installed Vista General
Best anti-spyware Vista security


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46