![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Concurrent Anti-Spyware Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware no pk "Iain" <iain@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:5ortipFnlpfbU1@xxxxxx Quote: > Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently are > forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware Iain <iain@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes > concurrently are forbidden, does the same hold true for > anti-spyware? two firewalls for that matter) at the same time, since they may conflict and even cause crashes. As for anti-spyware, it's the other way around. No single anti-spyware program has a good enough detection rate, it is therefore recommended to run at least two, hoping that the second program picks up what the first didn't and vice versa. Conflicts are not a big issue with these programs. Charlie42 |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware There's no harm, in fact it's advisable, to run occasional scans with multiple spyware tools. Running multiple resident programs, however, may cause conflicts and performance problems. -- "Iain" <iain@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:5ortipFnlpfbU1@xxxxxx Quote: > Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently are > forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware Iain wrote: Quote: > Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently > are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware? real time (mostly because of the resources used), but scanning for spyware with multiple scanners is not only allowed, it's still considered a "best practice"... -- Regards, Hank Arnold Microsoft MVP Windows Server - Directory Services |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:14:48 -0400, "Hank Arnold (MVP)" <rasilon@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >Iain wrote: Quote: >> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently >> are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware? >Not at all. I'd be careful about running multiple programs monitoring >real time (mostly because of the resources used), but scanning for >spyware with multiple scanners is not only allowed, it's still >considered a "best practice"... up-and-running environment is. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware "Straight Talk" <b__nice@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:5k0mi3lpqmu8o7j3os5jh06vmjd565bfkv@xxxxxx Quote: > On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:14:48 -0400, "Hank Arnold (MVP)" > <rasilon@xxxxxx> wrote: > Quote: >>Iain wrote: Quote: >>> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently >>> are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware? >>Not at all. I'd be careful about running multiple programs monitoring >>real time (mostly because of the resources used), but scanning for >>spyware with multiple scanners is not only allowed, it's still >>considered a "best practice"... > No. It's considered "nonsense" - like any "scanning" for malware in an > up-and-running environment is. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:26:20 -0000, "Doug" <just_me@xxxxxx_address.replytogroup> wrote: Quote: >"Straight Talk" <b__nice@xxxxxx> wrote in message >news:5k0mi3lpqmu8o7j3os5jh06vmjd565bfkv@xxxxxx Quote: >> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:14:48 -0400, "Hank Arnold (MVP)" >> <rasilon@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Quote: >>>Iain wrote: >>>> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently >>>> are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware? >>> >>>Not at all. I'd be careful about running multiple programs monitoring >>>real time (mostly because of the resources used), but scanning for >>>spyware with multiple scanners is not only allowed, it's still >>>considered a "best practice"... >> No. It's considered "nonsense" - like any "scanning" for malware in an >> up-and-running environment is. >Your advice is therefore? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware "Straight Talk" <b__nice@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:s6imi3tc1nk2rs58l3qlr2fmcvq8ksvnlm@xxxxxx Quote: > On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:26:20 -0000, "Doug" > <just_me@xxxxxx_address.replytogroup> wrote: > Quote: >>"Straight Talk" <b__nice@xxxxxx> wrote in message >>news:5k0mi3lpqmu8o7j3os5jh06vmjd565bfkv@xxxxxx Quote: >>> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:14:48 -0400, "Hank Arnold (MVP)" >>> <rasilon@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>>Iain wrote: >>>>> Whilst I'm aware that running dual anti-virus programmes concurrently >>>>> are forbidden, does the same hold true for anti-spyware? >>>> >>>>Not at all. I'd be careful about running multiple programs monitoring >>>>real time (mostly because of the resources used), but scanning for >>>>spyware with multiple scanners is not only allowed, it's still >>>>considered a "best practice"... >>> >>> No. It's considered "nonsense" - like any "scanning" for malware in an >>> up-and-running environment is. >>Your advice is therefore? > Simple. Don't install it in the first place. unbidden! How should I keep it out? If by "it" you refer to anti-spyware software, are you saying that its use is a bad idea and that spyware should be left unmolested? Or is it that periodic manual purges are OK but that spyware blocking in real time messes up the up-and-running environment? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: Concurrent Anti-Spyware On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 08:17:27 -0000, "Doug" <just_me@xxxxxx_address.replytogroup> wrote: Quote: >Please clarify. If by "it" you refer to the malware, it installs itself >unbidden! Quote: >How should I keep it out? sources and by running not inherently broken software like IE. Malware is primarily caused by user's lack of knowledge/care and buggy software. BTW, how bad is the malware-situation on Vista anyway? |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Malware Detections of Free Anti-Malware/Anti-Spyware | System Security | |||
| anti-spyware | Vista security | |||
| What Anti Spyware? | Vista General | |||
| System Health report - SP1 - Anti Spyware and Anti Virus not recognised as installed | Vista General | |||
| Best anti-spyware | Vista security | |||