![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Users I have Vista Home Premium 64 bit. I had the computer built by a local shop and they installed the OS. I am the User named Walter and also the Adminstrator. Should I set things so that I log in as a Standard User instead of as an Adminstrator? Is it worth the effort? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Users Walter wrote: Quote: > I have Vista Home Premium 64 bit. > > I had the computer built by a local shop and they installed the OS. I > am the User named Walter and also the Adminstrator. Should I set things > so that I log in as a Standard User instead of as an Adminstrator? Is > it worth the effort? > > and assign it to the Users group. You need to have at least 1 administrator account. -- Regards, Hank Arnold Microsoft MVP Windows Server - Directory Services |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Users "Hank Arnold (MVP)" <rasilon@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:eocJd1yRIHA.1208@xxxxxx Quote: > Walter wrote: Quote: >> I have Vista Home Premium 64 bit. >> >> I had the computer built by a local shop and they installed the OS. I am >> the User named Walter and also the Adminstrator. Should I set things so >> that I log in as a Standard User instead of as an Adminstrator? Is it >> worth the effort? >> >> > Best practice says you should run as a user. I'd create another account > and assign it to the Users group. You need to have at least 1 > administrator account. > > -- > > Regards, > Hank Arnold > Microsoft MVP > Windows Server - Directory Services files from the current Admin account to the new User account. also, I can't imagine a situation on my home computer where I wouldn't want to have all apps available to every user. So that means I should always be in the Admin account when I install apps, right? If I am in a user account when I install an app will it install for all users? I have not yet turned off UAC, like I hear most people eventually do. Will switching to this strategy of running as a standard user but installing apps as an Admin allow me to turn of UAC without losing the advantages that UAC provides. (not sure what that actually is.) |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Users If you are installing while using a standard user account and the install requires administrator, then a dialog box comes up where you can select an administrator account to give you admin privileges for the install. "Walter" <nospam@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:e$w8ZF3RIHA.2376@xxxxxx Quote: > > "Hank Arnold (MVP)" <rasilon@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:eocJd1yRIHA.1208@xxxxxx Quote: >> Walter wrote: Quote: >>> I have Vista Home Premium 64 bit. >>> >>> I had the computer built by a local shop and they installed the OS. I >>> am the User named Walter and also the Adminstrator. Should I set things >>> so that I log in as a Standard User instead of as an Adminstrator? Is >>> it worth the effort? >>> >>> >> Best practice says you should run as a user. I'd create another account >> and assign it to the Users group. You need to have at least 1 >> administrator account. >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> Hank Arnold >> Microsoft MVP >> Windows Server - Directory Services > Okay, if I start logging in as a standard User than I will move all my > data files from the current Admin account to the new User account. > > also, I can't imagine a situation on my home computer where I wouldn't > want to have all apps available to every user. So that means I should > always be in the Admin account when I install apps, right? If I am in a > user account when I install an app will it install for all users? > > I have not yet turned off UAC, like I hear most people eventually do. > Will switching to this strategy of running as a standard user but > installing apps as an Admin allow me to turn of UAC without losing the > advantages that UAC provides. (not sure what that actually is.) |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Users "Walter" <nospam@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:e$w8ZF3RIHA.2376@xxxxxx Quote: > > "Hank Arnold (MVP)" <rasilon@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:eocJd1yRIHA.1208@xxxxxx Quote: >> Walter wrote: Quote: >>> I have Vista Home Premium 64 bit. >>> >>> I had the computer built by a local shop and they installed the OS. I >>> am the User named Walter and also the Adminstrator. Should I set things >>> so that I log in as a Standard User instead of as an Adminstrator? Is >>> it worth the effort? >>> >>> >> Best practice says you should run as a user. I'd create another account >> and assign it to the Users group. You need to have at least 1 >> administrator account. >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> Hank Arnold >> Microsoft MVP >> Windows Server - Directory Services > Okay, if I start logging in as a standard User than I will move all my > data files from the current Admin account to the new User account. > > also, I can't imagine a situation on my home computer where I wouldn't > want to have all apps available to every user. So that means I should > always be in the Admin account when I install apps, right? If I am in a > user account when I install an app will it install for all users? > > I have not yet turned off UAC, like I hear most people eventually do. > Will switching to this strategy of running as a standard user but > installing apps as an Admin allow me to turn of UAC without losing the > advantages that UAC provides. (not sure what that actually is.) by UAC for the admin password. Unless the program installer itself offers to limit use to one user, all users will always be able to run just about any program installed, with the exception of programs that require admin privileges. When you attempt to open a program that needs admin rights you'll again be prompted for the admin password to allow it to run. Turning off UAC is not recommended. This actually defeats much of the security in Vista. Also, you will have to be logged on to your admin account to install anything with UAC turned off, since the standard users will not get a prompt for the admin password, only a message stating that you have to be an admin to install the program. UAC can seem very annoying when you're first installing all of your software on a new machine, but UAC hardly ever pops up, even for a standard user, once all your applications are installed and you've set up the computer to your liking. It's ironic to me that Unix, Linux and Mac users have lived with prompts to elevate user privileges to "root" every time they need to make a system change, or install software, with nary a complaint about it, but especially Linux users (and Apple themselves) make fun of UAC in Vista . . . even thought it's the same basic thing. Sure, on Linux once you've elevated you don't see the prompt again for whatever the timeout is set for (thus giving EVERYTHING that runs during that time full access to the system) and with UAC even if it's 2 seconds after elevating one program you run another that needs admin rights, you get another prompt, it's still the same basic thing. Mic |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Users Thanks for the answers about the user accounts. I also listened to an old podcast called Security Now with Steve Gibson and Leo Leporte about UAC and it does sound like a good idea so I will not turn it off. But my real concern is this: Over the years I've downloaded a lot of free applications and utilities for all types of things. I usually learn about these apps from reviews, newsgroups and web searches and in the end I have no idea who has written them. Some of them are open source, but it doesn't do me much good because I'm not a programmer so I don't have the knowledge to inspect the code, searching for anything nefarious. And most of the stuff is not open source anyway. So for example -- I download a free disk defrag application. When it starts up I get a UAC message asking me if I want to let Vista run it. It certainly doesn't seem like much sense to say No. So I say Yes. If that disk defrag application is a disk application, but also a trojan or some other app that wants to start running in the background logging keystrokes or whatever, I've just compromised my computer. So it seems to me that UAC is only really going to work for people who only put applications on their computers that they know, with absolute certainty, are safe. This may work for people that only load a limited set of popular apps but might not be of much use for me. Am I missing something? (like I say I still intend to run UAC anyway.) |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Help Run Dll C:\Users\ Users name\AppData\local\temp\axdeqxgo.dll | Vista security | |||
| Compare users in AD with an SQL table and insert the missing users | VB Script | |||
| Preventing guest users or other users seeing your files | Vista file management | |||
| Access All Users & Default Users Start menu | Vista file management | |||
| cant connect to my doccuments on \\domaincontroller\users\users sh | Vista networking & sharing | |||