![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Avast/AVG Free plus Defender adequate? I am considering uninstalling the 90-day Norton trial that came with my new Vista-equipped Toshiba laptop. I had AVG, the free one, on my XP machine, and have heard about Avast. I don't want to be more worried than I need to be about viruses; would the free version of AVG, or Avast Home Edition and, if necessary, the Windows Defender and/ or Firewall be enough, or more than enough, in place of the Norton suite. There is Norton checking my main email account at Yahoo so that's safe anyway. They use AVG in my local internet cafe, at a guess the free one. Though they have adware popping up a lot, they have a lot of perhaps over-experimental customers and the version of Windows there is XP. Maybe they don't update and check enough either. (I was harebrained with my XP machine, never had virus-protection and when belatedly installing AVG found 18 worms and Trojans, gathered over 3 years possibly.) Could someone summarise what problems or flaws I would be free of when I uninstall Norton, other than the obligation to pay up after the 90 days, which I'm keen on. Having never had such a fast computer and broadband before I don't know any difference regarding any lag it may cause, but obviously if it's real I'd like to be rid of it, and I've heard a lot of criticism of Norton. I don't fully understand viruses, either. Could someone fill me in on this: I thought you'd have to install something infected or malware- containing, but the first time I used Norton, with my laptop plugged in in the i-cafe, it found 2 viruses straight away - or was this a Norton test? (Do viruses somehow make a beeline for computers that are online and try to find a way in regardless of what we are downloading?) Only cookies have been found since, and I keep, perhaps unecessarily, 'fixing' these Thanks in advance for all advice. I can spot commercial input, so impartial comment only please. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Avast/AVG Free plus Defender adequate? One of the best Windows Vista protection suites I have used is Windows OneCare. Though not free, it is very comprehensive in preventing malware from entering into your system. You can try it free for 90 days: http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/default.htm -- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows Desktop Experience - Windows System & Performance --------------------------------------------------------------- "kplumm" wrote: I am considering uninstalling the 90-day Norton trial that came with my new Vista-equipped Toshiba laptop. I had AVG, the free one, on my XP machine, and have heard about Avast. I don't want to be more worried than I need to be about viruses; would the free version of AVG, or Avast Home Edition and, if necessary, the Windows Defender and/ or Firewall be enough, or more than enough, in place of the Norton suite. There is Norton checking my main email account at Yahoo so that's safe anyway. They use AVG in my local internet cafe, at a guess the free one. Though they have adware popping up a lot, they have a lot of perhaps over-experimental customers and the version of Windows there is XP. Maybe they don't update and check enough either. (I was harebrained with my XP machine, never had virus-protection and when belatedly installing AVG found 18 worms and Trojans, gathered over 3 years possibly.) Could someone summarise what problems or flaws I would be free of when I uninstall Norton, other than the obligation to pay up after the 90 days, which I'm keen on. Having never had such a fast computer and broadband before I don't know any difference regarding any lag it may cause, but obviously if it's real I'd like to be rid of it, and I've heard a lot of criticism of Norton. I don't fully understand viruses, either. Could someone fill me in on this: I thought you'd have to install something infected or malware- containing, but the first time I used Norton, with my laptop plugged in in the i-cafe, it found 2 viruses straight away - or was this a Norton test? (Do viruses somehow make a beeline for computers that are online and try to find a way in regardless of what we are downloading?) Only cookies have been found since, and I keep, perhaps unecessarily, 'fixing' these Thanks in advance for all advice. I can spot commercial input, so impartial comment only please. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | RE: Avast/AVG Free plus Defender adequate? I used AVG free 7.5 with Vista until recently with good results. AVG and Microsoft say that it dose not work with Vista, but other than the Vista problem warings I had no problems. For spyware I use Spybot S&D (also freware) which has an optional resident that that ask you about registry and other changes so that you can allow them or Deny them (which I find helpfull). I needed a security sw to be able to do backups and such so I bought Windows Live One Care it comes with 3 lic. and I installed it on two computers XP and Vista it had issues. It was hard to install on the XP machine, and in my oppinion didn't work as advertised on either machine.I didn't keep it on either computer for a week. I did learn to only get a trial ware first, although I'm not sure the lesson was worth 50 bucks. I used Norton for years,but it became worse than the malware in 2007, and then was real hard to get rid of. I've not tried avast. PC magazine (online) has reviews on software and veiwer comments. Most software manufacturs have forum, and that will tell you alot about the problems you are considering buying. The best way to pick a security software is search for reviews by companies that don't sell the sofware they review. The forums give you a lot of info about problems people are having with the product and compatibility issues. Good Luck "kplumm" wrote: Quote: > I am considering uninstalling the 90-day Norton trial that came with > my new Vista-equipped Toshiba laptop. I had AVG, the free one, on my > XP machine, and have heard about Avast. I don't want to be more > worried than I need to be about viruses; would the free version of > AVG, or Avast Home Edition and, if necessary, the Windows Defender and/ > or Firewall be enough, or more than enough, in place of the Norton > suite. There is Norton checking my main email account at Yahoo so > that's safe anyway. > > They use AVG in my local internet cafe, at a guess the free one. > Though they have adware popping up a lot, they have a lot of perhaps > over-experimental customers and the version of Windows there is XP. > Maybe they don't update and check enough either. (I was harebrained > with my XP machine, never had virus-protection and when belatedly > installing AVG found 18 worms and Trojans, gathered over 3 years > possibly.) > > Could someone summarise what problems or flaws I would be free of when > I uninstall Norton, other than the obligation to pay up after the 90 > days, which I'm keen on. Having never had such a fast computer and > broadband before I don't know any difference regarding any lag it may > cause, but obviously if it's real I'd like to be rid of it, and I've > heard a lot of criticism of Norton. > > I don't fully understand viruses, either. Could someone fill me in on > this: I thought you'd have to install something infected or malware- > containing, but the first time I used Norton, with my laptop plugged > in in the i-cafe, it found 2 viruses straight away - or was this a > Norton test? (Do viruses somehow make a beeline for computers that > are online and try to find a way in regardless of what we are > downloading?) Only cookies have been found since, and I keep, perhaps > unecessarily, 'fixing' these > > Thanks in advance for all advice. I can spot commercial input, so > impartial comment only please. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Avast/AVG Free plus Defender adequate? OneCare received another bad review on the PC magazine I just read "Carey Frisch [MVP]" <cnfrisch@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:1A2A3355-BD1B-445E-8D7D-D3EEA1EB2EFA@xxxxxx Quote: > One of the best Windows Vista protection suites I have > used is Windows OneCare. Though not free, it > is very comprehensive in preventing malware from > entering into your system. You can try it free > for 90 days: http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/default.htm > > -- > Carey Frisch > Microsoft MVP > Windows Desktop Experience - > Windows System & Performance > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > "kplumm" wrote: > > I am considering uninstalling the 90-day Norton trial that came with > my new Vista-equipped Toshiba laptop. I had AVG, the free one, on my > XP machine, and have heard about Avast. I don't want to be more > worried than I need to be about viruses; would the free version of > AVG, or Avast Home Edition and, if necessary, the Windows Defender and/ > or Firewall be enough, or more than enough, in place of the Norton > suite. There is Norton checking my main email account at Yahoo so > that's safe anyway. > > They use AVG in my local internet cafe, at a guess the free one. > Though they have adware popping up a lot, they have a lot of perhaps > over-experimental customers and the version of Windows there is XP. > Maybe they don't update and check enough either. (I was harebrained > with my XP machine, never had virus-protection and when belatedly > installing AVG found 18 worms and Trojans, gathered over 3 years > possibly.) > > Could someone summarise what problems or flaws I would be free of when > I uninstall Norton, other than the obligation to pay up after the 90 > days, which I'm keen on. Having never had such a fast computer and > broadband before I don't know any difference regarding any lag it may > cause, but obviously if it's real I'd like to be rid of it, and I've > heard a lot of criticism of Norton. > > I don't fully understand viruses, either. Could someone fill me in on > this: I thought you'd have to install something infected or malware- > containing, but the first time I used Norton, with my laptop plugged > in in the i-cafe, it found 2 viruses straight away - or was this a > Norton test? (Do viruses somehow make a beeline for computers that > are online and try to find a way in regardless of what we are > downloading?) Only cookies have been found since, and I keep, perhaps > unecessarily, 'fixing' these > > Thanks in advance for all advice. I can spot commercial input, so > impartial comment only please. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Avast/AVG Free plus Defender adequate? "kplumm" <kplumm@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:7bbb95ec-c81d-42e3-952e-0f80515721c6@xxxxxx [snip] Quote: > I don't fully understand viruses, either. Could someone fill me in on > this: I thought you'd have to install something infected or malware- > containing, but the first time I used Norton, with my laptop plugged > in in the i-cafe, it found 2 viruses straight away - or was this a > Norton test? likely to be detected - the mere fact that you're networking opens you up to them. Files are created and data transfered as a matter of course during networking - especially the internet (think TEMP files, log files...) Quote: > (Do viruses somehow make a beeline for computers that > are online and try to find a way in regardless of what we are > downloading?) It's like a dormitory and a bad guy finds a key. He doesn't know what door his key fits, so he just randomly tries doors. Worse, there are many bad guys trying many keys in many doors. When you connect to the network - you've moved your valuables into the dorm. Your AV probably detected a bad guy trying a key in your door. It doesn't necessarily mean his key worked. It also doesn't mean your spare cash is still safely tucked away in the icecube tray. Without knowing what and where, it is all speculation. [snip] ....and now a word from our sponsors |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Avast/AVG Free plus Defender adequate? AV-Test.org released their latest test results in which WLOC earned a 97.8% malware detection rating. This is a HUGE improvement over this time last year. The spyware detection (91.5%) is low compared to others but this is being addressed: http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2008...antivirus.html Also MS acquired Komoku to beef up their rootkit and proactive defenses in Forefront/OneCare http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware...es-komoku.aspx "DL" <address@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uF4OLCgkIHA.3512@xxxxxx Quote: > OneCare received another bad review on the PC magazine I just read > > "Carey Frisch [MVP]" <cnfrisch@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:1A2A3355-BD1B-445E-8D7D-D3EEA1EB2EFA@xxxxxx Quote: >> One of the best Windows Vista protection suites I have >> used is Windows OneCare. Though not free, it >> is very comprehensive in preventing malware from >> entering into your system. You can try it free >> for 90 days: http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/default.htm >> >> -- >> Carey Frisch >> Microsoft MVP >> Windows Desktop Experience - >> Windows System & Performance >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> "kplumm" wrote: >> >> I am considering uninstalling the 90-day Norton trial that came with >> my new Vista-equipped Toshiba laptop. I had AVG, the free one, on my >> XP machine, and have heard about Avast. I don't want to be more >> worried than I need to be about viruses; would the free version of >> AVG, or Avast Home Edition and, if necessary, the Windows Defender and/ >> or Firewall be enough, or more than enough, in place of the Norton >> suite. There is Norton checking my main email account at Yahoo so >> that's safe anyway. >> >> They use AVG in my local internet cafe, at a guess the free one. >> Though they have adware popping up a lot, they have a lot of perhaps >> over-experimental customers and the version of Windows there is XP. >> Maybe they don't update and check enough either. (I was harebrained >> with my XP machine, never had virus-protection and when belatedly >> installing AVG found 18 worms and Trojans, gathered over 3 years >> possibly.) >> >> Could someone summarise what problems or flaws I would be free of when >> I uninstall Norton, other than the obligation to pay up after the 90 >> days, which I'm keen on. Having never had such a fast computer and >> broadband before I don't know any difference regarding any lag it may >> cause, but obviously if it's real I'd like to be rid of it, and I've >> heard a lot of criticism of Norton. >> >> I don't fully understand viruses, either. Could someone fill me in on >> this: I thought you'd have to install something infected or malware- >> containing, but the first time I used Norton, with my laptop plugged >> in in the i-cafe, it found 2 viruses straight away - or was this a >> Norton test? (Do viruses somehow make a beeline for computers that >> are online and try to find a way in regardless of what we are >> downloading?) Only cookies have been found since, and I keep, perhaps >> unecessarily, 'fixing' these >> >> Thanks in advance for all advice. I can spot commercial input, so >> impartial comment only please. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Avast/AVG Free plus Defender adequate? On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:12:05 -0700 (PDT), kplumm wrote: Quote: > I am considering uninstalling the 90-day Norton trial that came with > my new Vista-equipped Toshiba laptop. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT...05033108162039 Quote: > I had AVG, the free one, on my > XP machine, and have heard about Avast. I don't want to be more > worried than I need to be about viruses; would the free version of > AVG, or Avast Home Edition and, if necessary, the Windows Defender and/ > or Firewall be enough, or more than enough, in place of the Norton > suite. can safely operate utilizing quality programs free of charge. Top-notch applications: Avira AntiVir® PersonalEdition Classic - Free http://www.free-av.com/antivirus/allinonen.html You may wish to consider removing the 'AntiVir Nagscreen' http://www.elitekiller.com/files/disable_antivir_nag.ht and SuperAntispyware - Free http://www.superantispyware.com/supe...freevspro.html and Ad-Aware 2007 - Free http://www.lavasoftusa.com/products/ad_aware_free.php http://www.download.com/3000-2144-10045910.html and Spybot Search & Destroy - Free http://www.safer-networking.org/en/download/index.html and Windows Defender - Free (build-in in Vista) http://www.microsoft.com/athome/secu...e/default.mspx Interesting reading: http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,136195/article.html "...Windows Defender did excel in behavior-based protection, which detects changes to key areas of the system without having to know anything about the actual threat." Optional: SpywareBlaster - Free "SpywareBlaster is not a scanner application. It blocks the installation of most ActiveX-based spyware, adware, browser hijackers, dialers and other unwanted programs from the user's computer. SpywareBlaster works by blacklisting the CLSID of known malware programs, effectively preventing them from infecting a protected computer and also allows the user to prevent privacy hazards such as tracking cookies." http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html You are not going to find anything better than the Vista FW and Vista in itself due to the advanced features the FW and Vista are using. "Personal Firewalls" are mostly snake-oil. http://www.samspade.org/d/firewalls.html Jesper's Blogs- At Least This Snake Oil Is Free. http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesp...l-is-free.aspx Windows Firewall: the best new security feature in Vista? http://blogs.technet.com/jesper_joha...01/426921.aspx Exploring The Windows Firewall. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tec...l/default.aspx "If you try to block outbound connections from a computer that’s already compromised, how can you be sure that the computer is really doing what you ask? The answer: you can’t. Outbound protection is security theater—it’s a gimmick that only gives the impression of improving your security without doing anything that actually does improve your security. This is why outbound protection didn’t exist in the Windows XP firewall and why it doesn’t exist in the Windows Vista™ firewall." Tap into the Vista firewall's advanced configuration features http://articles.techrepublic.com.com...7-6098592.html "...once you discover the secret of accessing its advanced configuration settings via the MMC snap-in, you'll find it to be far more configurable and functional. At last, Windows comes with a sophisticated personal firewall that can be used to set up outbound rules as well as inbound, with the ability to customize rules to fit your precise needs." Or Configure Vista Firewall to support outbound packet filtering http://searchwindowssecurity.techtar...247138,00.html Or Vista Firewall Control (Free versions available). Protects your applications from undesirable network incoming and outgoing activity, controls applications internet access. http://sphinx-soft.com/Vista/ Quote: > There is Norton checking my main email account at Yahoo so > that's safe anyway. Installation on some AV apps.) as it provides no additional protection. http://www.oehelp.com/OETips.aspx#3 In fact, most of experts (incl. Norton) believe that scanning incoming and outgoing mail causes e-mail file corruption. Quote: > They use AVG in my local internet cafe, at a guess the free one. > Though they have adware popping up a lot, they have a lot of perhaps > over-experimental customers and the version of Windows there is XP. > Maybe they don't update and check enough either. (I was harebrained > with my XP machine, never had virus-protection and when belatedly > installing AVG found 18 worms and Trojans, gathered over 3 years > possibly.) > > Could someone summarise what problems or flaws I would be free of when > I uninstall Norton, other than the obligation to pay up after the 90 > days, which I'm keen on. Having never had such a fast computer and > broadband before I don't know any difference regarding any lag it may > cause, but obviously if it's real I'd like to be rid of it, and I've > heard a lot of criticism of Norton. A number of experts agree that the retail AV version of McAfee, Norton and Trend Micro has become cumbersome and bloated for the average user and can play havoc with your pc Quote: > I don't fully understand viruses, either. Could someone fill me in on > this: I thought you'd have to install something infected or malware- > containing, but the first time I used Norton, with my laptop plugged > in in the i-cafe, it found 2 viruses straight away - or was this a > Norton test? (Do viruses somehow make a beeline for computers that > are online and try to find a way in regardless of what we are > downloading?) Only cookies have been found since, and I keep, perhaps > unecessarily, 'fixing' these http://www.claymania.com/safe-hex.html Hundreds Click on 'Click Here to Get Infected' Ad http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2132447,00.asp Quote: > Thanks in advance for all advice. I can spot commercial input, so > impartial comment only please. ![]() |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Avast/AVG Free plus Defender adequate? "kplumm" <kplumm@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:7bbb95ec-c81d-42e3-952e-0f80515721c6@xxxxxx Quote: >I am considering uninstalling the 90-day Norton trial that came with > my new Vista-equipped Toshiba laptop. I had AVG, the free one, on my > XP machine, and have heard about Avast. If you can wait for AVG Free 8.0 it may be certified as Vista compatible. Why don't you just wait until your 90-days is expired or nearly expired? There is also an AVG Anti-spyware (free) as well as SpywareBlaster 4.0. http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/index.html I have been using AVG Free on Windows XP SP2 since April 2005 without problems. -- Allan |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | RE: Avast/AVG Free plus Defender adequate? Windows Firewall is fine!! Remove Norton ; it is a resource hog! http://www.avast.com/eng/download-avast-home.html Above is a link to Avast Free 4 Home Anti-Virus It is low resource using, free and Vista 32bit and 64bit compatible. http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html For Spyware removal, use the above link to “Spybot Search & Destroy 1.5.2” Download it, install it, update it, immunize your system and scan your System with it. http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/ For a non-scanning, but running the background, Program to STOP Spyware being downloaded to your Computer, use SpywareBlaster 4, available at the above link. -- Mick Murphy - Qld - Australia "kplumm" wrote: Quote: > I am considering uninstalling the 90-day Norton trial that came with > my new Vista-equipped Toshiba laptop. I had AVG, the free one, on my > XP machine, and have heard about Avast. I don't want to be more > worried than I need to be about viruses; would the free version of > AVG, or Avast Home Edition and, if necessary, the Windows Defender and/ > or Firewall be enough, or more than enough, in place of the Norton > suite. There is Norton checking my main email account at Yahoo so > that's safe anyway. > > They use AVG in my local internet cafe, at a guess the free one. > Though they have adware popping up a lot, they have a lot of perhaps > over-experimental customers and the version of Windows there is XP. > Maybe they don't update and check enough either. (I was harebrained > with my XP machine, never had virus-protection and when belatedly > installing AVG found 18 worms and Trojans, gathered over 3 years > possibly.) > > Could someone summarise what problems or flaws I would be free of when > I uninstall Norton, other than the obligation to pay up after the 90 > days, which I'm keen on. Having never had such a fast computer and > broadband before I don't know any difference regarding any lag it may > cause, but obviously if it's real I'd like to be rid of it, and I've > heard a lot of criticism of Norton. > > I don't fully understand viruses, either. Could someone fill me in on > this: I thought you'd have to install something infected or malware- > containing, but the first time I used Norton, with my laptop plugged > in in the i-cafe, it found 2 viruses straight away - or was this a > Norton test? (Do viruses somehow make a beeline for computers that > are online and try to find a way in regardless of what we are > downloading?) Only cookies have been found since, and I keep, perhaps > unecessarily, 'fixing' these > > Thanks in advance for all advice. I can spot commercial input, so > impartial comment only please. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Vista Business/Home Premium/Ultimate x64/Server 2008 X64 | Re: Avast/AVG Free plus Defender adequate? I am a old fan of SpywareBlaster, But I havent used it for a year. Since I moved to Vista Ultimate x64 i havent been able to get a clear answer as to whether or not its x64 safe. If anyone knows whether or not SpywareBlaster works with x64 Vista, please post. I have been using Spybot S&D for years and love it. It just seems to get better and better. I also swear by NOD32(AV not security suite). Its by far the best. I also use a spyware app called A-Squared. I tried the premium version but could justify the cost when the free version works justas well. I do have the premium versio of SuperAntiSpyware. I takes a while to scan but it finds everything. Firewall has been a lifelong quest for one that is worth a crap. If you got Vista(x86 or x64) use either the windows firewall w/the Vista firewall control, or disable it and use Comodo. Comodo is free and they finally got it right. Good Luck! |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vista, Windows Firewall, Windows Defender, UAC, Avast - is this fairly secure, or is anything else needed? Advice appreciated. | Vista General | |||
| AVG Free or Avast Home? | Vista security | |||
| Security centre failing to pick up Defender and Avast | Vista security | |||
| Vista and defender killed Avast home edition 4.7 ??? | Vista General | |||
| windows defender and avast virus problems | Vista security | |||