Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Newsgroups > Vista security

Vista - anti-spyware

Reply
 
Old 05-29-2008   #1 (permalink)
Pepper


 
 

anti-spyware

I have McAfee Internet Security Suite. I know how much most of you detest
it, but I paid for a three-year subscription and I'm keeping it. Is it okay
to leave Window's Defender's real-time protection turned on, or will it
conflict with the McAfee?

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 05-29-2008   #2 (permalink)
jaquar001


 
 

RE: anti-spyware

keep window defender ON.because it has different functionality other that
antivirus, it will not confilict..

"Pepper" wrote:
Quote:

> I have McAfee Internet Security Suite. I know how much most of you detest
> it, but I paid for a three-year subscription and I'm keeping it. Is it okay
> to leave Window's Defender's real-time protection turned on, or will it
> conflict with the McAfee?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 05-30-2008   #3 (permalink)
Charlie42


 
 

Re: anti-spyware

"Pepper" <Pepper@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

>I have McAfee Internet Security Suite. I know how much most of you
> detest it, but I paid for a three-year subscription and I'm keeping it.
> Is
> it okay to leave Window's Defender's real-time protection turned on,
> or will it conflict with the McAfee?
While it is recommended to run an additional anti-spyware program (which
Defender is), running both as real-time protection may in rare cases cause
conflicts, the programs try to fight each other etc.

Windows Defender seems to coexist peacefully with most AS programs, so I
think you should give it a go. If problems occur, you can always turn one of
the programs off.

Charlie42

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 05-31-2008   #4 (permalink)
FromTheRafters


 
 

Re: anti-spyware

It is my understanding that the reason two AVs may conflict
is because of their "on-access" components both hooking
file system calls. The WD application uses agents for "real
time" protection and are mostly looking for certain activity
(behavior) such as registry manipulations and are executing
in the background.

Has anyone reported actual conflicts with WD and any AV?


"Charlie42" <Charlie42@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uHImNjnwIHA.1936@xxxxxx
Quote:

> "Pepper" <Pepper@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
Quote:

>>I have McAfee Internet Security Suite. I know how much most of you
>> detest it, but I paid for a three-year subscription and I'm keeping it.
>> Is
>> it okay to leave Window's Defender's real-time protection turned on,
>> or will it conflict with the McAfee?
>
> While it is recommended to run an additional anti-spyware program (which
> Defender is), running both as real-time protection may in rare cases cause
> conflicts, the programs try to fight each other etc.
>
> Windows Defender seems to coexist peacefully with most AS programs, so I
> think you should give it a go. If problems occur, you can always turn one
> of the programs off.
>
> Charlie42
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 06-01-2008   #5 (permalink)
Charlie42


 
 

Re: anti-spyware

"FromTheRafters" <Erratic@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

> It is my understanding that the reason two AVs may conflict
> is because of their "on-access" components both hooking
> file system calls. The WD application uses agents for "real
> time" protection and are mostly looking for certain activity
> (behavior) such as registry manipulations and are executing
> in the background.
>
> Has anyone reported actual conflicts with WD and any AV?
Not that I am aware of. The warning on multiple real-time security programs
is a general one, and it is a more of an issue with anti-viruses than
anti-spywares really.

Charlie42

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 06-04-2008   #6 (permalink)
FromTheRafters


 
 

Re: anti-spyware


"Charlie42" <Charlie42@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23bXXhl8wIHA.4848@xxxxxx
Quote:

> "FromTheRafters" <Erratic@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
Quote:

>> It is my understanding that the reason two AVs may conflict
>> is because of their "on-access" components both hooking
>> file system calls. The WD application uses agents for "real
>> time" protection and are mostly looking for certain activity
>> (behavior) such as registry manipulations and are executing
>> in the background.
>>
>> Has anyone reported actual conflicts with WD and any AV?
>
> Not that I am aware of. The warning on multiple real-time security
> programs is a general one, and it is a more of an issue with anti-viruses
> than anti-spywares really.
In the past, with AVs, "real time" and "on access" have been
used almost interchangeably. Now that many other anti-malware
programs have gone "real time" it adds confusion about the
conflict issue.

The only other conflict issue is the fact that some anti-* may
detect others anti-* as actual malware. The anti-malware
suite seems to become the only option to avoid this conflict.
So those that like a "component stereo" approach are losing
out.

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 06-04-2008   #7 (permalink)
Charlie42


 
 

Re: anti-spyware

"FromTheRafters" <Erratic@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

> In the past, with AVs, "real time" and "on access" have been
> used almost interchangeably. Now that many other anti-malware
> programs have gone "real time" it adds confusion about the
> conflict issue.
Yep. I was talking about the programs that are sometimes called "memory
resident".
Quote:

> The only other conflict issue is the fact that some anti-* may
> detect others anti-* as actual malware. The anti-malware
> suite seems to become the only option to avoid this conflict.
> So those that like a "component stereo" approach are losing
> out.
I disagree. Like some of the other posters here, I do not think suites offer
the best protection, but the major issue is their usually excessive
footprints.

Conflicts between anti-spyware programs are rare, conflicts between
anti-spywares and anti-viruses are even rarer (I have yet to see one). My
practical approach with anti-spywares is like I told the OP; give it a try,
and turn off/uninstall one program if it should not work out.

Charlie42

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Malware Detections of Free Anti-Malware/Anti-Spyware System Security
What Anti Spyware? Vista General
System Health report - SP1 - Anti Spyware and Anti Virus not recognised as installed Vista General
Anti Virus / Spyware System Security
Best anti-spyware Vista security


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46