![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
br> br> |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | Two versions of Vista on same HD - Security Issue Allo, I have two different builds of Vista on the same drive, separate partitions. I noticed that if I'm running one and want to access data on the other, I can just navigate to that drive, and only run into a warning when I attempt to access a user's private foulder. I can click the box and the warnign goes away, giving me access to the user's files. Since I'm not the administrator of that partition/user group shouldnt it block me? I dont have any encryption set up yet, but I'd think since vista does this in it's own instance, connecting to a different instance of vista should require you to be in the same group/permissions set. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Two versions of Vista on same HD - Security Issue Hello, The reason this is possible is due to the way Windows handles well-known group permissions. The well know groups in Windows, such as Users, Administrators, etc, are recognized on the permissions for the files/folder regardless of what installation of Windows created the files/folder. So, if you have a file that was created in one installation of Windows that gave Administrators full control over it, then logged in to a DIFFERENT installation of Windows as an administrator, you would have full control over that file, even though it was created in a different installation of Windows. The same thing is happening in your case - you are accessing a file/folder that you SPECIFICALLY do not have access to, but "Administrators" do - so the system asks you if you want to invoke your administrator powers and give yourself access to the folder. You are correct in that this does pose a slight security risk - however, the benefits far outweight the risks. If this did not work the way I described, you would not be able to dual boot between instances of Windows effectively, as you would be denied read AND write access to ALL files made from any other instance of Windows. Also, keep in mind that if one has physical access to the hard disk, one can bypass any file-based security mechanism with the right tool - so the actual security of the files of another installation of windows when another operating system is running on that computer is pretty poor, regardless of what permissions are in place. -- - JB Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Researchers at Black Hat Reveal Major Vista Security Issue | tonymazz | System Security | 8 | 08-12-2008 09:58 AM |
| Vista - Security Issue - 2 Admin profile on 1 computer | marilynstlouis | Vista account administration | 0 | 05-20-2008 08:33 PM |
| Folder Versions has Non Existent List in Previous Versions Tab | Sid | Vista performance & maintenance | 1 | 02-12-2008 01:55 AM |
| Security issue with malware on Vista bypasses UAC and sends out SPAM | Grant - CNW | Vista security | 12 | 01-21-2008 10:56 PM |
| OEM versions and Full Versions of Vista | Robert Katz | Vista installation & setup | 9 | 08-17-2007 11:13 AM |