UAC per user?

Hello all...

I am just wondering, is it possible to leave UAC fully enabled for some
users, and either greatly reduced, or off for other uses?

Or is the best option along these lines simply to set up some users as
standard and some as Administrators?

Thanks in advance,
Arthur Dent.

Arthur Dent wrote:
> Hello all...
>
> I am just wondering, is it possible to leave UAC fully enabled for some
> users, and either greatly reduced, or off for other uses?
>
> Or is the best option along these lines simply to set up some users as
> standard and some as Administrators?

No. UAC is on/off globally. Yes, you should set up users as Standard
whenever possible and have a few Administrators.

I have my towel. ;-)


Malke
--
Elephant Boy Computers
www.elephantboycomputers.com
"Don't Panic!"
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User

That''s what a thought... i guess you can set up the Admins, and then just
set that secpol setting for "always treat admins as elevated" or whatever it
is called.... and thatd be the closest you'd get. Alright, thanks!

Hang on to that towel.... never know when it will come in handy!!!
(some one GOT it!! )

"Malke" <notreally@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:eZWAQYCWHHA.3592@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Arthur Dent wrote:
>> Hello all...
>>
>> I am just wondering, is it possible to leave UAC fully enabled for some
>> users, and either greatly reduced, or off for other uses?
>>
>> Or is the best option along these lines simply to set up some users as
>> standard and some as Administrators?
>
> No. UAC is on/off globally. Yes, you should set up users as Standard
> whenever possible and have a few Administrators.
>
> I have my towel. ;-)
>
>
> Malke
> --
> Elephant Boy Computers
> www.elephantboycomputers.com
> "Don't Panic!"
> MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User

Arthur Dent spake thusly on 2/24/2007 8:57 AM:
> That''s what a thought... i guess you can set up the Admins, and then
> just set that secpol setting for "always treat admins as elevated"

Whoa! I didn't know that was an option.

LOL Thanks. :-)


--
Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.

Check out at > Local Security Policy > Local Policies > Security Options >
User Account Control: Run all administrators in Admin Approval Mode... i
believe this it the right item...

"Scott" <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote in message
news:OV70kUFWHHA.4076@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Arthur Dent spake thusly on 2/24/2007 8:57 AM:
>> That''s what a thought... i guess you can set up the Admins, and then
>> just set that secpol setting for "always treat admins as elevated"
>
> Whoa! I didn't know that was an option.
>
> LOL Thanks. :-)
>
>
> --
> Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
> be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.