Vista - Microsoft Security Bulletin Advance Notification - April 2007

Ottmar Freudenberger wrote:
> "PA Bear" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> schrieb:
>
>> I /swear/ that the content you quoted was *not* on the blog page
>> when I read it c. 0500 UTC, 02 Apr-07 (c. 10:00 PM Pacific Time, 01
>> Apr-07) and posted my reply to this thread,
>
> Well, are you accessing "the web" via a proxy server? That one may not
> have had the actual version of the sit|de. I can only assure you, that
> the content didn't change since at least 0245 UTC. Really. I did
> update the info on my site at that time and informed some german
> languaged newsgroups (news:euq22g.1ao.1@news.messageid.de), ISC and
> US-CERT after- wards by mail. Mark H from ISC replied on 0400 UTC
> that he has updated the diary (which he really did, although this has
> been superseded without further notice by an entry of Kevin dated
> 1245 UTC lately with the same content, claiming to be Version 1 of
> the entry for whatever reason), while US-CERT played dead man and
> still doesn't mention the announced update "planned" to be released
> via WU/MU/AU some 13 hours or so from now.
>
>> nor did
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec...n/advance.mspx
>> contain "On Tuesday 3 April 2007 Microsoft is planning to release"
>> and below when I viewed the page around the same time.
>
> See above. I've received the mail announcement of the Advance
> Notification on 0142 UTC and it has been there on the web side too at
> that time (at least an hour later when I "waked" up).
>
>> /Mea culpa/. <w>
>
> Nothing to apologize for or feel sorry about. It's just strange.
> Remake of "X-Files" anyone?
>
> FWIW,
> Freudi

Have any critical updates been released today?
Have just checked MS Updates and nothing there for XP Pro SP2.

They plan to release today. Maybe not ready yet :-)

"Smirnoff" <someone@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:eMfVSXedHHA.4772@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Ottmar Freudenberger wrote:
>> "PA Bear" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> schrieb:
>>
>>> I /swear/ that the content you quoted was *not* on the blog page
>>> when I read it c. 0500 UTC, 02 Apr-07 (c. 10:00 PM Pacific Time, 01
>>> Apr-07) and posted my reply to this thread,
>>
>> Well, are you accessing "the web" via a proxy server? That one may not
>> have had the actual version of the sit|de. I can only assure you, that
>> the content didn't change since at least 0245 UTC. Really. I did
>> update the info on my site at that time and informed some german
>> languaged newsgroups (news:euq22g.1ao.1@news.messageid.de), ISC and
>> US-CERT after- wards by mail. Mark H from ISC replied on 0400 UTC
>> that he has updated the diary (which he really did, although this has
>> been superseded without further notice by an entry of Kevin dated
>> 1245 UTC lately with the same content, claiming to be Version 1 of
>> the entry for whatever reason), while US-CERT played dead man and
>> still doesn't mention the announced update "planned" to be released
>> via WU/MU/AU some 13 hours or so from now.
>>
>>> nor did
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec...n/advance.mspx
>>> contain "On Tuesday 3 April 2007 Microsoft is planning to release"
>>> and below when I viewed the page around the same time.
>>
>> See above. I've received the mail announcement of the Advance
>> Notification on 0142 UTC and it has been there on the web side too at
>> that time (at least an hour later when I "waked" up).
>>
>>> /Mea culpa/. <w>
>>
>> Nothing to apologize for or feel sorry about. It's just strange.
>> Remake of "X-Files" anyone?
>>
>> FWIW,
>> Freudi
>
> Have any critical updates been released today?
> Have just checked MS Updates and nothing there for XP Pro SP2.
>

"Smirnoff" <someone@nospam.invalid> schrieb:

> Have any critical updates been released today?

Not yet. I'ld assume the update (only one is announced to be
released today out of the Patch Day cycle) to be availble via
AU/WU/MU at around 17:00 UTC (18:00 in your time zone).

Bye,
Freudi

When is 17:00 UTC in UK's British Summer time which we entered last weekend?
i.e.GMT + 1hour.

Thanks
"Ottmar Freudenberger" <freudi@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:57f9ulF2bpidlU1@mid.individual.net...
> "Smirnoff" <someone@nospam.invalid> schrieb:
>
>> Have any critical updates been released today?
>
> Not yet. I'ld assume the update (only one is announced to be
> released today out of the Patch Day cycle) to be availble via
> AU/WU/MU at around 17:00 UTC (18:00 in your time zone).
>
> Bye,
> Freudi

Ottmar Freudenberger wrote:
> "Smirnoff" <someone@nospam.invalid> schrieb:
>
>> Have any critical updates been released today?
>
> Not yet. I'ld assume the update (only one is announced to be
> released today out of the Patch Day cycle) to be availble via
> AU/WU/MU at around 17:00 UTC (18:00 in your time zone).
>
> Bye,
> Freudi

I see, thanks

Donna and some others saw the same contents that I did, Freudi. I suppose
it was a replication issue.

Best regards,
--
~Robear


Ottmar Freudenberger wrote:
> "PA Bear" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> schrieb:
>
>> I /swear/ that the content you quoted was *not* on the blog page when I
>> read it c. 0500 UTC, 02 Apr-07 (c. 10:00 PM Pacific Time, 01 Apr-07) and
>> posted my reply to this thread,
>
> Well, are you accessing "the web" via a proxy server? That one may not
> have had the actual version of the sit|de. I can only assure you, that
> the content didn't change since at least 0245 UTC. Really. I did update
> the info on my site at that time and informed some german languaged
> newsgroups (news:euq22g.1ao.1@news.messageid.de), ISC and US-CERT after-
> wards by mail. Mark H from ISC replied on 0400 UTC that he has updated
> the diary (which he really did, although this has been superseded without
> further notice by an entry of Kevin dated 1245 UTC lately with the same
> content, claiming to be Version 1 of the entry for whatever reason),
> while US-CERT played dead man and still doesn't mention the announced
> update "planned" to be released via WU/MU/AU some 13 hours or so from now.
>
>> nor did
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec...n/advance.mspx contain
>> "On
>> Tuesday 3 April 2007 Microsoft is planning to release" and below when I
>> viewed the page around the same time.
>
> See above. I've received the mail announcement of the Advance Notification
> on 0142 UTC and it has been there on the web side too at that time (at
> least an hour later when I "waked" up).
>
>> /Mea culpa/. <w>
>
> Nothing to apologize for or feel sorry about. It's just strange. Remake
> of "X-Files" anyone?
>
> FWIW,
> Freudi

moot question as update out and in-stalled

B
"PA Bear" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23xxoM$gdHHA.4004@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Donna and some others saw the same contents that I did, Freudi. I suppose
> it was a replication issue.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> ~Robear
>
>
> Ottmar Freudenberger wrote:
>> "PA Bear" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> schrieb:
>>
>>> I /swear/ that the content you quoted was *not* on the blog page when I
>>> read it c. 0500 UTC, 02 Apr-07 (c. 10:00 PM Pacific Time, 01 Apr-07) and
>>> posted my reply to this thread,
>>
>> Well, are you accessing "the web" via a proxy server? That one may not
>> have had the actual version of the sit|de. I can only assure you, that
>> the content didn't change since at least 0245 UTC. Really. I did update
>> the info on my site at that time and informed some german languaged
>> newsgroups (news:euq22g.1ao.1@news.messageid.de), ISC and US-CERT after-
>> wards by mail. Mark H from ISC replied on 0400 UTC that he has updated
>> the diary (which he really did, although this has been superseded without
>> further notice by an entry of Kevin dated 1245 UTC lately with the same
>> content, claiming to be Version 1 of the entry for whatever reason),
>> while US-CERT played dead man and still doesn't mention the announced
>> update "planned" to be released via WU/MU/AU some 13 hours or so from
>> now.
>>
>>> nor did
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec...n/advance.mspx contain
>>> "On
>>> Tuesday 3 April 2007 Microsoft is planning to release" and below when I
>>> viewed the page around the same time.
>>
>> See above. I've received the mail announcement of the Advance
>> Notification
>> on 0142 UTC and it has been there on the web side too at that time (at
>> least an hour later when I "waked" up).
>>
>>> /Mea culpa/. <w>
>>
>> Nothing to apologize for or feel sorry about. It's just strange. Remake
>> of "X-Files" anyone?
>>
>> FWIW,
>> Freudi
>

"PA Bear" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> schrieb:

> Donna and some others saw the same contents that I did, Freudi.

Strange. Both of you aren't using a proxy, right?

> I suppose it was a replication issue.

Although I have some difficulties in understanding what exactly you
mean here (issue on the server or client end?), I can only once again
assure you that the content I've cited has been on the site when I
vistited the site and when I quoted from the site later on too.

Anyway, the patch is out and that's the main reason for anyone.

Bye,
Freudi

I Received This from emergency email Network thast i subcribe to for such
warnings So I Went to the MS update Website. but no update needed
http://www.emergencyemail.org/newsem....asp?a=186&z=1 THE
EMERGENCY EMAIL & WIRELESS NETWORKA Service of The Emergency Email Network
since 1999http://www.emergencyemail.org

whats up with this update?

"Ottmar Freudenberger" wrote:

> "Donna Buenaventura" <dbuenaventura@mvps.org> schrieb:
>
> > On Tuesday 3 April 2007 Microsoft is planning to release:
> >
> > Security Updates
> > * One Microsoft Security Bulletin affecting Microsoft Windows. The highest
> > Maximum Severity rating for these is Critical. These updates will require a
> > restart. These updates will be detectable using the Microsoft Baseline
> > Security Analyzer.
>
> This will be a very, very important patch to be released out of the
> normal Patch Day cycle. For more details see
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec...ry/935423.mspx
> http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archiv...ry-935423.aspx
> http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=2534 and
> http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/191609
>
> Bye,
> Freudi
>

Windows version?
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security, Shell/User)
AumHa VSOP & Admin; DTS-L.org

Ranger93 wrote:
> I Received This from emergency email Network thast i subcribe to for such
> warnings So I Went to the MS update Website. but no update needed
> http://www.emergencyemail.org/newsem....asp?a=186&z=1 THE
> EMERGENCY EMAIL & WIRELESS NETWORKA Service of The Emergency Email Network
> since 1999http://www.emergencyemail.org
>
> whats up with this update?
>
> "Ottmar Freudenberger" wrote:
>
>> "Donna Buenaventura" <dbuenaventura@mvps.org> schrieb:
>>
>>> On Tuesday 3 April 2007 Microsoft is planning to release:
>>>
>>> Security Updates
>>> * One Microsoft Security Bulletin affecting Microsoft Windows. The
>>> highest
>>> Maximum Severity rating for these is Critical. These updates will
>>> require
>>> a restart. These updates will be detectable using the Microsoft Baseline
>>> Security Analyzer.
>>
>> This will be a very, very important patch to be released out of the
>> normal Patch Day cycle. For more details see
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec...ry/935423.mspx
>> http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archiv...ry-935423.aspx
>> http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=2534 and
>> http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/191609
>>
>> Bye,
>> Freudi