![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Defeating Keystroke Logging Programs ? Hello everyone, I came across someone's idea (printed below) on how to defeat keystroke logging programs, it seems like a good idea. What do you all think ? Is there another perhaps better way ? Other than keeping your antivirus and antispyware up to date, of course. Also, what about on screen keyboards ? (Ie. type osk.exe in the "run" menu) Are they effective ? Here, you don't even use the keyboard at all ! *** excerpt of person's idea *** But there’s a completely simple way to defeat them, based on the fact that a keylogger doesn’t know where on the page the focus is when you’re typing — it has no context, it just has what is typed. So, next time you login from a public internet terminal or somewhere else you want to make sure your keystrokes aren’t being logged, do this — Put the focus on the password field, and type one character. Then click somewhere else on the page — open Notepad if you have to — and type a bunch of random characters. Then, click back in the password field, and type another character. Repeat until your password is complete. Extremely simple, extremely effective. Without the context of where the focus was when you were typing, the resulting string of characters is useless. From this report at Alta Vista Security Group. Via Metafilter. **** end of excerpt **** |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Defeating Keystroke Logging Programs ? Paul wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I came across someone's idea (printed below) on how to defeat keystroke > logging programs, it seems like a good idea. What do you all think ? Is > there another perhaps better way ? Other than keeping your antivirus and > antispyware up to date, of course. > > Also, what about on screen keyboards ? (Ie. type osk.exe in the "run" menu) > Are they effective ? Here, you don't even use the keyboard at all ! The onscreen keyboard completely emulates keyboard events, and just looks like a normal keyboard to your programs (good and bad). This means the key presses will still be captured normally. > *** excerpt of person's idea *** > > But there’s a completely simple way to defeat them, based on the fact that a > keylogger doesn’t know where on the page the focus is when you’re typing — it > has no context, it just has what is typed. Faulty axiom. A keylogger can easily know which control has the focus, and most keyloggers do track focus changes. Sorry. Doesn't work :-( Alun Harford |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Defeating Keystroke Logging Programs ? I didn't know this. So, if I understand you correctly, the keylogger can tell which keystrokes are actually used by the application and how they are used, and which keystrokes are "thrown on the floor". I order to do this, doesn't the keylogger have to log a picture of the website as well ? Paul ____________________________________ "Alun Harford" wrote: > . . . > > *** excerpt of person's idea *** > > > > But there’s a completely simple way to defeat them, based on the fact that a > > keylogger doesn’t know where on the page the focus is when you’re typing — it > > has no context, it just has what is typed. > > Faulty axiom. A keylogger can easily know which control has the focus, > and most keyloggers do track focus changes. > > Sorry. Doesn't work :-( > > Alun Harford > keystroke logging keypress log |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Defeating Keystroke Logging Programs ? Paul wrote: > I didn't know this. So, if I understand you correctly, the keylogger can > tell which keystrokes are actually used by the application and how they are > used, and which keystrokes are "thrown on the floor". > > I order to do this, doesn't the keylogger have to log a picture of the > website as well ? No. It just has to log the handle of the windows control that has the focus when the user types each key. Alun Harford |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Defeating Keystroke Logging Programs ? Just a thought, because I don't know anything about keyloggers, but can they be tricked by typing text into the appropriate field, selecting all (or a part) of the text via the mouse and just replacing text that way as you go (the window in question never looses focus)??? Emill "Alun Harford" <devnull@alunharford.co.uk> wrote in message news:e63ZbAnsHHA.4916@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Paul wrote: >> I didn't know this. So, if I understand you correctly, the keylogger can >> tell which keystrokes are actually used by the application and how they >> are used, and which keystrokes are "thrown on the floor". >> >> I order to do this, doesn't the keylogger have to log a picture of the >> website as well ? > > No. It just has to log the handle of the windows control that has the > focus when the user types each key. > > Alun Harford > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Defeating Keystroke Logging Programs ? > "Alun Harford" <devnull@alunharford.co.uk> wrote in message > news:e63ZbAnsHHA.4916@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> Paul wrote: >>> I didn't know this. So, if I understand you correctly, the keylogger >>> can tell which keystrokes are actually used by the application and how >>> they are used, and which keystrokes are "thrown on the floor". >>> >>> I order to do this, doesn't the keylogger have to log a picture of the >>> website as well ? >> >> No. It just has to log the handle of the windows control that has the >> focus when the user types each key. >> >> Alun Harford "Emill" <emill@eunet.yu> wrote in message news:1D756D69-02D3-4A5F-80D8-8C33B27898D8@microsoft.com... > Just a thought, because I don't know anything about keyloggers, but can > they be tricked by typing text into the appropriate field, selecting all > (or a part) of the text via the mouse and just replacing text that way as > you go (the window in question never looses focus)??? > Emill You could get around it by typing the end of the password, clicking to the start and entering the start of the password. Most keyloggers will record focus and if the moust was clicked but they generally dont know WHERE the mouse was clicked. So if my password was 12345 i could type 345 click to the start, type 23, click to the start and type 1. Or you could just open character map and choose the letters from that or an on-screen keyboard. Copy and pasting from another window that already has the words in is another workaround. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| XP Pro | Re: Defeating Keystroke Logging Programs ? You know.. I think that the easiest way to defeat keyloggers is to use anti-keyloggers None of us know about them as much as specialists do. Can also recommend to visit these two sites:Keylogger.org - Independent testing, rating and review of monitoring software, Anti-Keylogger.Org - Independent Comparison of Popular Anti-Keyloggers and Anti-Spyware Products |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| All my programs crash when logging in | System Security | |||
| Need help - keystroke logger??? | System Security | |||
| Keystroke Mystery!!! | Vista General | |||
| Keystroke commands | Vista General | |||
| Article - Malware defeating UAC doesn't appear too hard to do | Vista General | |||