![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| | Re: Every move in Vista requires "permission". WHY and How do I tu yes that is what i did for myself but Joe Bloe doesn't want to/doesnt know how to open secpol and play around in there. Ed was satisfied with just turning it off, which is what this thread is about. -- R. "Alun Jones" <alun@texis.invalid> wrote in message news:ONSp$MS1HHA.1100@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > "Ryan" <RyanUnderscoreGermainAtHotmail> wrote in message > news:e$YznmQ1HHA.3536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> it was an example...replace with anything else that requires >> administrative privileges. I dont want to be asked to continue at every >> other action I make if I'm an administrator. > > Then simply configure UAC to not prompt for elevation for administrators. > > That way, when you're in your administrator account doing administrator > things, you'll be an administrator whenever you need to be, but by leaving > UAC in place and enabled, your restricted account, which you use for all > of your email and surfing, will still be protected. You'll even keep some > measure of protection in your administrator account, as those applications > which are marked to not elevate will run as restrocted user. > >> However i do think it was a great idea to have the ability to prompt for >> admin credentials for users...no more right-click run as for me! > > Oh, you'll still have to do that for programs that aren't updated for > Vista. > > Alun. > ~~~~ > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| | Re: Every move in Vista requires "permission". WHY and How do I tu Ryan wrote: > yes that is what i did for myself but Joe Bloe doesn't want to/doesnt know > how to open secpol and play around in there. Ed was satisfied with just > turning it off, which is what this thread is about. If he doesn't know how to open secpol, I'd rather he didn't turn off UAC. I get enough spam already. Alun Harford |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Why in Vista Ultimate am I unable to turn on "Internet Information Services" in the turn windows features on or off ? | Vista security | |||
| Possible to turn off first UAC "You'll need to provide permission"dialog but leave second? | Vista General | |||
| How to turn off "You need permission to delete this folder" annoyance | Vista General | |||
| Re: "What's the deal with UAC (Windows Needs Your Permission screens)" and "...But I thought I was an administrator" | Vista security | |||
| Vista Upgrade "Requires clean install" help needed. | Vista installation & setup | |||