AVG Free or Avast Home?

In another thread I posted my rant about McAfee and Norton, now I need a
replacement and want to try one of the free programs.

It seems that AVG and Avast are the front-runners in this category. I've
done a search and gathered much info, but I'm still undecided.

I've downloaded both and tried both on my HP and both seem very good, but I
don't want to wait until one of them screws up my system to find I choose the
wrong program.

For anyone that has used either for awhile could post their experience it
would be useful (to many people I think).

Info that maybe helpful:

HP Pavilion dv9500t
Vista Home Premium
2.2 Intel Centrino Duo
2 GB RAM (2 cards)
Intel 4965AGN wireless
Bluetooth
Office Professional 2007 (heavy use of Outlook)
IE7 used heavily
ISP: Verizon DSL

Information on PC is private but not sensitive, no financial stuff, etc.

Any other recommendations for upgrading firewall and spyware protection
would also be welcome.

Thanks!!!!

I have tried both AVG and Avast and prefer Avast. I have only
Internet Mail - Network Shield - Standard Shield and Web Shield
running or 4 of the 7 available since I don't use Outlook, Instant
Messaging, or P2P software.


"romanom" <romanom@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FE406611-490C-46E6-94D9-4DDD9B87118D@microsoft.com...
> In another thread I posted my rant about McAfee and Norton, now I need a
> replacement and want to try one of the free programs.
>
> It seems that AVG and Avast are the front-runners in this category. I've
> done a search and gathered much info, but I'm still undecided.
>
> I've downloaded both and tried both on my HP and both seem very good, but
> I
> don't want to wait until one of them screws up my system to find I choose
> the
> wrong program.
>
> For anyone that has used either for awhile could post their experience it
> would be useful (to many people I think).
>
> Info that maybe helpful:
>
> HP Pavilion dv9500t
> Vista Home Premium
> 2.2 Intel Centrino Duo
> 2 GB RAM (2 cards)
> Intel 4965AGN wireless
> Bluetooth
> Office Professional 2007 (heavy use of Outlook)
> IE7 used heavily
> ISP: Verizon DSL
>
> Information on PC is private but not sensitive, no financial stuff, etc.
>
> Any other recommendations for upgrading firewall and spyware protection
> would also be welcome.
>
> Thanks!!!!

On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:14:02 -0700, romanom
<romanom@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

> In another thread I posted my rant about McAfee and Norton, now I need a
> replacement and want to try one of the free programs.
>
> It seems that AVG and Avast are the front-runners in this category. I've
> done a search and gathered much info, but I'm still undecided.
>
> I've downloaded both and tried both on my HP and both seem very good, but I
> don't want to wait until one of them screws up my system to find I choose the
> wrong program.


They are both good and neither one is at all likely to screw up your
system. I prefer Avast!, but others whose opinions I respect prefer
AVG. You can't go wrong with either.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

"romanom" <romanom@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FE406611-490C-46E6-94D9-4DDD9B87118D@microsoft.com...
> In another thread I posted my rant about McAfee and Norton, now I need a
> replacement and want to try one of the free programs.
>
> It seems that AVG and Avast are the front-runners in this category. I've
> done a search and gathered much info, but I'm still undecided.
>
Another excellent AV apps for your consideration
Avira AntiVir® PersonalEdition Classic
http://www.free-av.com/antivirus/allinonen.html

romanom wrote:
> In another thread I posted my rant about McAfee and Norton, now I need a
> replacement and want to try one of the free programs.
>
> It seems that AVG and Avast are the front-runners in this category. I've
> done a search and gathered much info, but I'm still undecided.
>
> I've downloaded both and tried both on my HP and both seem very good, but I
> don't want to wait until one of them screws up my system to find I choose the
> wrong program.
>
> For anyone that has used either for awhile could post their experience it
> would be useful (to many people I think).
>
> Info that maybe helpful:
>
> HP Pavilion dv9500t
> Vista Home Premium
> 2.2 Intel Centrino Duo
> 2 GB RAM (2 cards)
> Intel 4965AGN wireless
> Bluetooth
> Office Professional 2007 (heavy use of Outlook)
> IE7 used heavily
> ISP: Verizon DSL
>
> Information on PC is private but not sensitive, no financial stuff, etc.
>
> Any other recommendations for upgrading firewall and spyware protection
> would also be welcome.
>
> Thanks!!!!


I've used both, and was completely satisfied with them. Neither have
ever caused me any problems. I finally settled on AVAST, primarily
because it was Vista-ready first, and it it seems to be updated (both
the application, itself, and the definition files) more frequently.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. -Bertrand Russell

This has always been the never-ending debate among these two major freeware
av. With regards to the PROTECTION here are my observations :

Avast in my opinion, is MUCH better at detecting virus files inside
compressed (zip'd) archives. Even AVG's complete scan will NOT detect ALL
infections inside the Zip files. And if the compressed files are .rar or
other formats, AVG's odds of detection are even less.

Next : Detection of email borne viruses in AVG is at best average. If you
have Outlook Express 6 client as part of Windows XP, you could easily end up
downloading and saving some common email borne viruses. Its only at the time
of extraction or saving the extracted infection that AVG gives a warning !
AVG even with using the Outlook Express plugin, u could download the virus to
your machine as an eml file, and it wont even warn when you open the eml
file.

--
http://www.WinVistaClub.com
Microsoft MVP 2007 Awardee.

"romanom" <romanom@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FE406611-490C-46E6-94D9-4DDD9B87118D@microsoft.com...
> In another thread I posted my rant about McAfee and Norton, now I need a
> replacement and want to try one of the free programs.
>
> It seems that AVG and Avast are the front-runners in this category. I've
> done a search and gathered much info, but I'm still undecided.
>
> I've downloaded both and tried both on my HP and both seem very good, but
> I
> don't want to wait until one of them screws up my system to find I choose
> the
> wrong program.
>
> For anyone that has used either for awhile could post their experience it
> would be useful (to many people I think).
>
> Info that maybe helpful:
>
> HP Pavilion dv9500t
> Vista Home Premium
> 2.2 Intel Centrino Duo
> 2 GB RAM (2 cards)
> Intel 4965AGN wireless
> Bluetooth
> Office Professional 2007 (heavy use of Outlook)
> IE7 used heavily
> ISP: Verizon DSL
>
> Information on PC is private but not sensitive, no financial stuff, etc.
>
> Any other recommendations for upgrading firewall and spyware protection
> would also be welcome.
>
> Thanks!!!!

I used AVG for a couple of years and only changed to Avast because it was
Vista compatible - the way I look at it free is a bargain which ever one you
use!
James

I went with AVG for one reason, Avast had a bug that was leaving ghosts or
'left-overs' of the menu after right-clicking on an object. Went to the
Avast free forum and found many are having the problem, but no solution.

Thank you very much for all you input!

"romanom" wrote:

> In another thread I posted my rant about McAfee and Norton, now I need a
> replacement and want to try one of the free programs.
>
> It seems that AVG and Avast are the front-runners in this category. I've
> done a search and gathered much info, but I'm still undecided.
>
> I've downloaded both and tried both on my HP and both seem very good, but I
> don't want to wait until one of them screws up my system to find I choose the
> wrong program.
>
> For anyone that has used either for awhile could post their experience it
> would be useful (to many people I think).
>
> Info that maybe helpful:
>
> HP Pavilion dv9500t
> Vista Home Premium
> 2.2 Intel Centrino Duo
> 2 GB RAM (2 cards)
> Intel 4965AGN wireless
> Bluetooth
> Office Professional 2007 (heavy use of Outlook)
> IE7 used heavily
> ISP: Verizon DSL
>
> Information on PC is private but not sensitive, no financial stuff, etc.
>
> Any other recommendations for upgrading firewall and spyware protection
> would also be welcome.
>
> Thanks!!!!

"anandk" <anandk@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6474008D-7949-46B5-9512-5E373F15EC0D@microsoft.com...
> This has always been the never-ending debate among these two major
> freeware
> av. With regards to the PROTECTION here are my observations :

I've got Avast on one PC and AVG on another. Avast has better protection but
also uses more resources, slows down web browser. For that reason I prefer
AVG.

"romanom" wrote:

> In another thread I posted my rant about McAfee and Norton, now I need a
> replacement and want to try one of the free programs.
>
> It seems that AVG and Avast are the front-runners in this category. I've
> done a search and gathered much info, but I'm still undecided.
>
> I've downloaded both and tried both on my HP and both seem very good, but I
> don't want to wait until one of them screws up my system to find I choose the
> wrong program.
>
> For anyone that has used either for awhile could post their experience it
> would be useful (to many people I think).
>
> Info that maybe helpful:
>
> HP Pavilion dv9500t
> Vista Home Premium
> 2.2 Intel Centrino Duo
> 2 GB RAM (2 cards)
> Intel 4965AGN wireless
> Bluetooth
> Office Professional 2007 (heavy use of Outlook)
> IE7 used heavily
> ISP: Verizon DSL
>
> Information on PC is private but not sensitive, no financial stuff, etc.
>
> Any other recommendations for upgrading firewall and spyware protection
> would also be welcome.
>
> Thanks!!!!

NEITHER! i have done my research on Free Anti-Viruses versus paid
anti-Viruses. Guess who lost. AVG and Avast. i used both, my computer kept on
having viruses, i could tell since suspicious behavior was going on, i had a
strong password and a good Firewall. one experience with Avast, i could not
log into my account, once i did, my screen turned green with a X in the top
left, and a hit OK, once i did, i got kicked off. An Experience with AVG, i
had a trojan, but it did nothing, so my system suffered. Ans with Antivir, i
wouldnt update for me, or detect any viruses, my background kept on changing
colors and doing weird things.

I acctually Recommend NOD32 or Kapersky. they are way better than Mcafee,
Norton, AVG, Antvir, and Bit Defender.

Research Test Results on NOD32 and Kapersky's Virus detection rate. Also
NOD32 has Pre-detection.

With NOD32, i was looking at e-mail, and a pop-up pops up, and NOD32 comes
up saying a Trojan was detected on the pop-ups website.


Please choose wisely. I did and Chose NOD32. BTW, AVG is the worst out of
the free-ones.