Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Newsgroups > Vista security

Vista - Bypass RunAs

Reply
 
Old 09-19-2007   #1 (permalink)
pjw lignon


 
 

Bypass RunAs

Dear All,

When a non-administrator wants to run an executable, Vista asks for an
adminstrator password.

If I want to allow an executable to run under a user without having to
provide an administrator password, is it possible/allowed in Vista?

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-19-2007   #2 (permalink)
Jesper


 
 

RE: Bypass RunAs

Not if you want the executable to run as an administrator. There is no setuid
equivalent on Windows.

If you control the executable, the proper way to do that is to refactor the
executable into a service portion, which runs elevated and performs the
administrative tasks, and a user-mode portion that runs as the user.
---
Your question may already be answered in Windows Vista Security:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047...otectyourwi-20


"pjw lignon" wrote:
Quote:

> Dear All,
>
> When a non-administrator wants to run an executable, Vista asks for an
> adminstrator password.
>
> If I want to allow an executable to run under a user without having to
> provide an administrator password, is it possible/allowed in Vista?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-21-2007   #3 (permalink)
Steve Easton


 
 

Re: Bypass RunAs

Have you tried embedding a manifest file as a resource in your application?
That will do it.

Info here:
http://www.devx.com/VistaSpecialRepo...33856/0/page/2
specifically in the middle of the page.


--

Steve Easton



"pjw lignon" <pjwlignon@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0854BD26-C038-48B4-898F-4E36A63311C0@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Dear All,
>
> When a non-administrator wants to run an executable, Vista asks for an
> adminstrator password.
>
> If I want to allow an executable to run under a user without having to
> provide an administrator password, is it possible/allowed in Vista?

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-21-2007   #4 (permalink)
Jesper


 
 

Re: Bypass RunAs

The manifest governs how elevation is invoked (automatica, only for members
of the admins group, or not at all). It does not permit automatic,
password-less elevation of only certain apps.
---
Your question may already be answered in Windows Vista Security:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047...otectyourwi-20


"Steve Easton" wrote:
Quote:

> Have you tried embedding a manifest file as a resource in your application?
> That will do it.
>
> Info here:
> http://www.devx.com/VistaSpecialRepo...33856/0/page/2
> specifically in the middle of the page.
>
>
> --
>
> Steve Easton
>
>
>
> "pjw lignon" <pjwlignon@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:0854BD26-C038-48B4-898F-4E36A63311C0@xxxxxx
Quote:

> > Dear All,
> >
> > When a non-administrator wants to run an executable, Vista asks for an
> > adminstrator password.
> >
> > If I want to allow an executable to run under a user without having to
> > provide an administrator password, is it possible/allowed in Vista?
>
>
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-22-2007   #5 (permalink)
Alex K. Angelopoulos \(MVP\)


 
 

Re: Bypass RunAs

A minor caveat - there actually _is_ a setuid included in the free SUA
add-on from Microsoft:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...8-efde5758c47f

Security implications of enabling setuid aside (you're warned in setup),
from a practical standpoint you're still right. Using setuid isn't something
that most users will want to get into.

"Jesper" <Jesper@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news3C43215-F198-45E5-B98E-124A4A3DF852@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Not if you want the executable to run as an administrator. There is no
> setuid
> equivalent on Windows.
>
> If you control the executable, the proper way to do that is to refactor
> the
> executable into a service portion, which runs elevated and performs the
> administrative tasks, and a user-mode portion that runs as the user.
> ---
> Your question may already be answered in Windows Vista Security:
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047...otectyourwi-20
>
>
> "pjw lignon" wrote:
>
Quote:

>> Dear All,
>>
>> When a non-administrator wants to run an executable, Vista asks for an
>> adminstrator password.
>>
>> If I want to allow an executable to run under a user without having to
>> provide an administrator password, is it possible/allowed in Vista?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-22-2007   #6 (permalink)
Jesper


 
 

Re: Bypass RunAs

Good point Alex. I didn't think of that. Does it actually do what setuid does
on Unix though? Does it let limited Windows users run administrative
applications?
---
Your question may already be answered in Windows Vista Security:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047...otectyourwi-20


"Alex K. Angelopoulos (MVP)" wrote:
Quote:

> A minor caveat - there actually _is_ a setuid included in the free SUA
> add-on from Microsoft:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...8-efde5758c47f
>
> Security implications of enabling setuid aside (you're warned in setup),
> from a practical standpoint you're still right. Using setuid isn't something
> that most users will want to get into.
>
> "Jesper" <Jesper@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news3C43215-F198-45E5-B98E-124A4A3DF852@xxxxxx
Quote:

> > Not if you want the executable to run as an administrator. There is no
> > setuid
> > equivalent on Windows.
> >
> > If you control the executable, the proper way to do that is to refactor
> > the
> > executable into a service portion, which runs elevated and performs the
> > administrative tasks, and a user-mode portion that runs as the user.
> > ---
> > Your question may already be answered in Windows Vista Security:
> > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047...otectyourwi-20
> >
> >
> > "pjw lignon" wrote:
> >
Quote:

> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> When a non-administrator wants to run an executable, Vista asks for an
> >> adminstrator password.
> >>
> >> If I want to allow an executable to run under a user without having to
> >> provide an administrator password, is it possible/allowed in Vista?
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-22-2007   #7 (permalink)
Robert Firth


 
 

Re: Bypass RunAs

The clear answer is that yes, it is possible. Make the program not require
administrative privileges. If it does require admin privileges, then it must
prompt the user.

--
Robert Firth


"pjw lignon" <pjwlignon@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0854BD26-C038-48B4-898F-4E36A63311C0@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Dear All,
>
> When a non-administrator wants to run an executable, Vista asks for an
> adminstrator password.
>
> If I want to allow an executable to run under a user without having to
> provide an administrator password, is it possible/allowed in Vista?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-23-2007   #8 (permalink)
Alex K. Angelopoulos \(MVP\)


 
 

Re: Bypass RunAs

Sorry about the response lag.

I had originally just noted that it was possible to do this while installing
SUA on Vista; it has options for allowing setuid (and also sutoroot) during
install phase. I went back this morning and tried allowing setuid to work,
even reinstalling SUA, but I can't even find the binary - just the man page.

I think this is going to take someone who knows more about SUA to answer,
which kind of drives home the point that it isn't a practical solution for
most people.


"Jesper" <Jesper@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:625CF4E0-012B-486F-9967-F777BF5F6B66@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Good point Alex. I didn't think of that. Does it actually do what setuid
> does
> on Unix though? Does it let limited Windows users run administrative
> applications?
> ---
> Your question may already be answered in Windows Vista Security:
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047...otectyourwi-20
>
>
> "Alex K. Angelopoulos (MVP)" wrote:
>
Quote:

>> A minor caveat - there actually _is_ a setuid included in the free SUA
>> add-on from Microsoft:
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...8-efde5758c47f
>>
>> Security implications of enabling setuid aside (you're warned in setup),
>> from a practical standpoint you're still right. Using setuid isn't
>> something
>> that most users will want to get into.
>>
>> "Jesper" <Jesper@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news3C43215-F198-45E5-B98E-124A4A3DF852@xxxxxx
Quote:

>> > Not if you want the executable to run as an administrator. There is no
>> > setuid
>> > equivalent on Windows.
>> >
>> > If you control the executable, the proper way to do that is to refactor
>> > the
>> > executable into a service portion, which runs elevated and performs the
>> > administrative tasks, and a user-mode portion that runs as the user.
>> > ---
>> > Your question may already be answered in Windows Vista Security:
>> > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047...otectyourwi-20
>> >
>> >
>> > "pjw lignon" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dear All,
>> >>
>> >> When a non-administrator wants to run an executable, Vista asks for an
>> >> adminstrator password.
>> >>
>> >> If I want to allow an executable to run under a user without having to
>> >> provide an administrator password, is it possible/allowed in Vista?
>>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
i need help with using 'runas.exe' Vista account administration
Impersonation Vs RunAs VB Script
RUNAS and Backup Vista performance & maintenance
RunAs Vista security
runas /user:USER problem and a strange behavior of runas Vista account administration


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46