Directx10...Worth it?

microdude431

New Member
I currently have a MSI Nvidia 7900GS OC 512MB video card. I got this card before DX10 came out and when I was running on XP Pro. Since I have upgraded to vista within the last 2 months, I was thinking of upgrading to a DX10 card. Do you think it would be really worth it? I've found a few nice cards for under $100.

Thanks!
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Custom Built
    CPU
    Intel i7 920
    Motherboard
    Intel DX58SO
    Memory
    6GB PC3 12800 DDR3
    Graphics Card(s)
    Asus 9800GTX+ 512MB
    Monitor(s) Displays
    AOC 917Vx
    Screen Resolution
    1440x900
    Hard Drives
    1 TB Western Digital Cavair Black
    320GB Seagate Barracuda
    250GB Western Digital My Passport
    PSU
    Antec EA650 650W ATX12V
    Case
    Antec Nine Hundred Black Steel ATX Mid Tower
    Internet Speed
    20MB down / 5MB up (Fios)
Actually, in this sort of a question, the answer is very subjective - the key question is if it is going to be worth it for you.

As you planning on playing brand new games such as the upcoming GTA IV, Far Cry 2, Fallout 3, etc? any current games that make use of Dx10 will benefit from a new card - and so with your WEI. However, if you're sticking to older games that make no use of Dx10 then unless you just feel like spending the money, I'd save it and wait a bit for some spectacular deals after Thanksgiving....
 

My Computers

System One System Two

  • Operating System
    Windows 10 Pro X64 Insider Preview (Skip Ahead) latest build
    Manufacturer/Model
    The Beast Model V (homebrew)
    CPU
    Intel Core i7 965 EE @ 3.6 GHz
    Motherboard
    eVGA X58 Classified 3 (141-GT-E770-A1)
    Memory
    3 * Mushkin 998981 Redline Enhanced triple channel DDR3 4 GB CL7 DDR3 1600 MHz (PC3-12800)
    Graphics Card(s)
    eVGA GeForce GTX 970 SSC ACX 2.0 (04G-P4-3979-KB)
    Sound Card
    Realtek HD Audio (onboard)
    Monitor(s) Displays
    2 * Lenovo LT2323pwA Widescreeen
    Screen Resolution
    2 * 1920 x 1080
    Hard Drives
    SanDisk Ultra SDSSDHII-960G-G25 960 GB SATA III SSD (System)
    Crucial MX100 CT256MX100SSD1 256GB SATA III SSD (User Tree)
    2 * Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 ST31000528AS 1TB 7200 RPM SATA II Mech. HD
    Seagate ST1500DL001-9VT15L Barracuda 7200.12 1.5 TB S
    PSU
    Thermaltake Black Widow TX TR2 850W 80+ Bronze Semi-Mod ATX
    Case
    ThermalTake Level 10 GT (Black)
    Cooling
    Corsair H100 (CPU, dual 140 mm fans on radiator) + Air (2 *
    Keyboard
    Logitech G15 (gen 2)
    Mouse
    Logitech MX Master (shared)
    Internet Speed
    AT&T Lightspeed Gigabit duplex
  • Operating System
    Sabayon Linux (current, weekly updates, 5.1.x kernel)
    Manufacturer/Model
    Lenovo ThinkPad E545
    CPU
    AMD A6-5350M APU
    Motherboard
    Lenovo
    Memory
    8 GB
    Graphics card(s)
    Radeon HD (Embedded)
    Sound Card
    Conextant 20671 SmartAudio HD
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Lenovo 15" Matte
    Screen Resolution
    1680 * 1050
    Hard Drives
    INTEL Cherryvill 520 Series SSDSC2CW180A 180 GB SSD
    PSU
    Lenovo
    Case
    Lenovo
    Cooling
    Lenovo
    Mouse
    Logitech MX Master (shared) | Synaptics TouchPad
    Keyboard
    Lenovo
    Internet Speed
    AT&T LightSpeed Gigabit Duplex
Microdude, fill out your system spec.
If we know the rest of your hardware we will be able to advise you on the course of action we would take in your situation.
If you have an old computer and do not play alot of new games as john said then no, dont bother to upgrade.
If you have a newish computer and are going to play new games then yes I would upgrade. How much you spend is up to you but remember that you get what you pay for.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Self Built
    CPU
    I5 3570K
    Motherboard
    Gigabyte Z77-DS3H
    Memory
    4 x 4GB corsair ballistix sport DDR3 1600 Mhz
    Graphics Card(s)
    Gigabyte Geforce GTX 660 TI
    Sound Card
    creative x-fi
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Primary CiBox 22" Widescreen LCD ,Secondary Dell 22" Widescreen
    Screen Resolution
    Both 1680 x 1050
    Hard Drives
    2 x 500G HD (SATA) 1 x 2TB USB
    PSU
    Corsair HX 620W ATX2.2 Modular SLI Complient PSU
    Case
    Antec 900 Ultimate Gaming Case
    Cooling
    3 x 80mm tri led front, 120mm side 120mm back, 200mm top
    Keyboard
    Logik
    Mouse
    Technika TKOPTM2
    Internet Speed
    288 / 4000
    Other Info
    Creative Inspire 7.1 T7900 Speakers
    Trust Graphics Tablet
A bit off a "Busrt your Bubble" kinda thing video cards are... read this taken from a site:

The search for the perfect videocard is like the search for perfect memory, it's never ending. A fantastic videocard that suits all your gaming needs right now can easily be shot down by newer and faster version three months down the road, or suffer a humiliating performance defeat at the hands of a new game. No matter the scenario, it's inevitable that videocards will always be replaced by better and bigger pixel busting technology. No other component in the computer of a gamer is as temporary as the videocard, and that's just the way ATI and nVidia like it.


As a Single Player Gamer and one that only Plays FPS games (First Person Shooters), I can honestly tell you that I have not seen a lot of differences between playing a game in DX9 and or DX10. I played Crysis on my XP Pro OS and I also played Crysis on my Vista x64 OS and with the 64 exe + DX10 and well... I saw no significant changes.

Now, this is only my opinion and it could be that my rig is not a good one for benchmarking and/or I am just to old to notice the subtle differences.

Being said that, I just pulled the pin on a new EVGA GTX260 (coming from a ECS 8800GT) just because I want to see if I can play my games maxed out. Something I can't do right now with my card.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Custom Built
    CPU
    Intel Q9650 w/CM V8 Cooler...
    Motherboard
    EVGA 780i SLI FTW... Latest Bios & Drivers
    Memory
    Corsair Dominator 8GB (4 x 2GB) PC2-8500C5D
    Graphics Card(s)
    EVGA GTX260
    Sound Card
    Realtek High Def Onboard
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Acer 22" LCD Widescreen
    Screen Resolution
    1680 x 1050
    Hard Drives
    WD Velociraptor 160GB
    Samsung Sata 750GB
    Maxtor External 160GB
    PSU
    PC Power & Cooling 750w Silencer
    Case
    Thermaltake Speedo Advance
    Cooling
    Air Cooled... See CPU
    Keyboard
    Logitech G15
    Mouse
    Logitech G7
    Internet Speed
    Comcast 6MB Broadband
    Other Info
    Linksys WRT54G router
"Directx10...Worth it?"

That would depend on your Hardware (and most importantly, video card), Game, Patches, Drivers

The answer is very subjective. Some people say they haven't noticed a difference between DX9 and DX10, but do notice a performance drop when running games under DX10.

Do note that only DX10 games can use DX10. However you can also run them under DX9 as well, in Vista.

My examples,

Crysis: It ran fairly well in DX10 on semi high settings till the last level, where I got massive stuttering and had to switch to DX9 mode to finish the game. Did I notice a difference in visuals? Not enough to make me wish I could finish the game in DX10.

On the other hand, Lost Planet: Colonies Edition, yeah, I did notice a difference in visuals between DX9 and 10. DX10 seemed to be more vibrant and details like the character’s fur stuck out. I was able to play that game without any problems all the way through.

Crysis Warhead, I played it all the way through the end under DX10 with little problems under "Gamer" settings. Nice visuals

Bioshock - didn't notice a difference either way, and I played that game all the way through twice. In fact the first time I played the game I played it with a DX9 only card (Radeon x1650Pro). So when I got my Radeon HD 3870 DX10 card, the first game I wanted to play was Bioshock as I was looking forward to the "added DX10 visuals" ....well, I didn't see them, especially in the water and oil spills, to me they looked the same. So...

So...If you have Vista and a DX10 card with a DX10 game, play in DX10, but if you have frame rate or stuttering problems, switch to DX9 mode. You may or may not notice a visual difference, but you'll probably notice a frame rate increase.

So...the question now becomes... frame rates or visuals?

Just my opinion,

…and by the way, I am a visuals type of guy :)
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Custom Built
    CPU
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz
    Motherboard
    Intel D975XBX2
    Memory
    Corsair TWIN2X4096-PC8500 (2x2GHz)
    Graphics Card(s)
    ATI Radeon HD 4890 (1GHz)
    Sound Card
    X-Fi Titanium - Fatality Pro Series
    Monitor(s) Displays
    hp w2207h (22" widescreen)
    Screen Resolution
    1680 x 1050
    Hard Drives
    One 750GB, 2x500GB Western Digital Caviar Black Hard Drives (32meg)
    PSU
    Antec Neo HE 550
    Case
    Antec P182
    Cooling
    Zalman CNPS9500 AT
    Keyboard
    Logitech Wireless Wave
    Mouse
    Logitech MX Revolution
    Internet Speed
    "High" Speed DSL? Is that like low speed FIOS?
    Other Info
    Q6600 B3 Revision OC to 3.0GHz
I was thinking of upgrading to a DX10 card.

The topic is "Directx10...Worth it?" and your thought is listed above.

You are not talking about the same thing in these two sentences.

The answer I will give you however, is the one you really want: A newer video card, like a 8800GT, will run MUCH faster than your 7900GS. Note that I am not specifying DX10 here. It will run faster in EVERYTHING. If you absolutely never, EVER use DX10 EVER for ANYTHING, you will STILL end up with a better gaming experience.
 

My Computer

"Directx10...Worth it?"


My examples,

Crysis: It ran fairly well in DX10 on semi high settings till the last level, where I got massive stuttering and had to switch to DX9 mode to finish the game. Did I notice a difference in visuals? Not enough to make me wish I could finish the game in DX10.

Crysis Warhead, I played it all the way through the end under DX10 with little problems under "Gamer" settings. Nice visuals

Bioshock - didn't notice a difference either way, and I played that game all the way through twice. In fact the first time I played the game I played it with a DX9 only card (Radeon x1650Pro). So when I got my Radeon HD 3870 DX10 card, the first game I wanted to play was Bioshock as I was looking forward to the "added DX10 visuals" ....well, I didn't see them, especially in the water and oil spills, to me they looked the same. So...

In the case of the original Crysis, the difference between DX9 and DX10 at least with the initial launch was marginal. A slight difference in lighting/shadows as far as I know. And maybe shaders. I started playing the game on XP with my current set up because it wasnt until last christmas my fiance got my Vista Ultimate :D. I have gone back and played since then and while I do play it in DX10 mode now under vista and have got used to the features it offers going back to DX9 is a little hard. I can tell the difference after prolonged exposure to DX10 such as smoke/flares/trails/water/shadows and even general lighting. All very minor details and when it comes down to it unless you're pushing the frames to keep it at a good level of performance with visual quality XP is really a better option. I reccomend at least experiancing the DX10 version if possible though as Crysis really is the flagship game for it since Age of Conan (I dont know about everyone else) but I stopped playing that WAAYY before the DX10 version came out.

As far as Bioshock goes, I've done a little research into the differences as well between DX10 vs DX9. Again they're very slight, though in a different way that Crysis because whereas almost EVERYONE will report a degrade in FPS with Crysis DX10, Bioshock uses a much more tolerant engine. Basically the shadows, water effects and I believe a few other slight changes like smoke are the only differences. And I can say this from experiance standpoint because the same thing goes that I played this game before I had vista and after. Basically though to notice the differences, you have to be shown them side by side or you might honestly never notice them. But once you do, you will begin to notice them in actual gameplay. Perhaps even come to be like me and shrug off a little tsk tsk when playing DX9 games where you see the things they could have had with DX10. Example being Oblivion, if only it had been another year in development it might still be pushing some of the best graphics out there without needing texture remapping programs. (In my strong opinion for its genre it still captures its enviroment superior to a lot of more recent games)

Crysis Warhead I have only played under Vista using DX10 and can say that it does run slightly better than the original but not nearly as much as I feel they hyped it to. Im sure under DX9 it still runs better though I can not for certain say because I have not tried myself. Nor do I really intend to. I find myself whenever I do occasionally have the need to boot up my XP installation constantly going "eeww look at that big over sized blue start button".

Oh and by the way as far as I know other than maybe the water reflections, Fallout 3 has absolutly no DX10 features if even that. I know it used the oblivion engine which was strictly DX9. Though I have only played it on Vista so I cant say for certain. If someone could confirm/deny this I would appreciate it. Regardless even on Vista I was able to get flawless frames with pretty much any settings I threw at it as long as I kept the outdoor shadows slider halfway and water to only the "high setting with non-full reflections".

As everyone has said though when it comes to DirectX 10 its a very touchy subjective topic. One that only you can decide on after you've made the purchase unfortunately or find a friend who has already "been there done that" who will allow you to sort of test drive it out on their system. I will say that as someone mentioned above upgrading your card does not directly have only to do with DirectX 10 as your performance with everything from basic Vista usage to gaming to HD video/Blu-Ray playback will greatly increase in performance with a new video card.

Good luck on your decision and if I were you I'd be looking at an 8800GTX or the Geforce 9 Series equivalent. The 2xx series is getting mixed reviews right now and the others will get your a definite improvement over your current card and cost a lot less. Unless you have the cash then go all out and get a 280 1g :D. Oh or if you prefer to go the ATI route I believe its 4860-70 cards are where its at or something. I'm not sure. I like Nvidias driver support over ATIs, though I will not deny that ATI has come a long way with performance otherwise. I rocked a 9800 128MB card until it died on me so I am not an nvidia fan boy or anything I just go where the FPS/Stability goes ;).
 

My Computer

System One

  • CPU
    AMD AM2 64 6000+
    Motherboard
    Asus M2N-E SLI
    Memory
    4 Gigs DDR2 800
    Graphics Card(s)
    Nvidia 8800GTS OC2 320MB
    Sound Card
    Creative X-Fi Titanium 5.1 Dolby Digital
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Acer 2216W 22Inch
    Screen Resolution
    1680x1050
    Hard Drives
    Hitachi SATA 380GB Windows XP Professional SP 2
    Western Digital 300GB Windows Vista Ultimate SP 1
    PSU
    650 Watt
    Case
    Thermaltake III Full Tower
    Keyboard
    Saitek Illuminated Desktop Keyboard
    Mouse
    Logitech MX310
    Internet Speed
    12Mbs
    Other Info
    Built this desktop myself about a year ago so that I could enjoy Crysis. May not be able to max out crysis more than 1440x900 Very High/Enthusiast (which still looks better than any other game :-X) but this desktop has yet to have any other game give it a hard time. Everything else I run in 1680x1050 16xAF 4xAA with Vsync. I love my PC :D
like a 8800GT

Or a Radeon 4850. We don't want to leave the other guys out :)

Either of these cards can be had for under a $200 (US) dollars; probably less.

...and yes, way better gaming experience over your 7900GS
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Custom Built
    CPU
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz
    Motherboard
    Intel D975XBX2
    Memory
    Corsair TWIN2X4096-PC8500 (2x2GHz)
    Graphics Card(s)
    ATI Radeon HD 4890 (1GHz)
    Sound Card
    X-Fi Titanium - Fatality Pro Series
    Monitor(s) Displays
    hp w2207h (22" widescreen)
    Screen Resolution
    1680 x 1050
    Hard Drives
    One 750GB, 2x500GB Western Digital Caviar Black Hard Drives (32meg)
    PSU
    Antec Neo HE 550
    Case
    Antec P182
    Cooling
    Zalman CNPS9500 AT
    Keyboard
    Logitech Wireless Wave
    Mouse
    Logitech MX Revolution
    Internet Speed
    "High" Speed DSL? Is that like low speed FIOS?
    Other Info
    Q6600 B3 Revision OC to 3.0GHz
@ Xandori,

I can't disagree with your assessment, and as i've said in my post, if you can play in DX10, do so, especially if you have a good video card.

As for me, I upgrded to a 4850 after my 3870 crapped out. Really nice card for the money, especially if your native resolution is 1280x1024.

Did a nice job with Crysis (except for that last level) under DX10, though I haven't touched the game since about 4 video card driver updates. Crysis Warhead played really well with it under DX10 as well.

So again, if you have Vista and a DX10 video card and game, then you really should try DX10.

As far as "is DirectX10 worth it", that's more of an OS upgrade question I suppose, since Vista has higher hardware requirements, and you'd most likely get a DX10 video card anyway.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Custom Built
    CPU
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz
    Motherboard
    Intel D975XBX2
    Memory
    Corsair TWIN2X4096-PC8500 (2x2GHz)
    Graphics Card(s)
    ATI Radeon HD 4890 (1GHz)
    Sound Card
    X-Fi Titanium - Fatality Pro Series
    Monitor(s) Displays
    hp w2207h (22" widescreen)
    Screen Resolution
    1680 x 1050
    Hard Drives
    One 750GB, 2x500GB Western Digital Caviar Black Hard Drives (32meg)
    PSU
    Antec Neo HE 550
    Case
    Antec P182
    Cooling
    Zalman CNPS9500 AT
    Keyboard
    Logitech Wireless Wave
    Mouse
    Logitech MX Revolution
    Internet Speed
    "High" Speed DSL? Is that like low speed FIOS?
    Other Info
    Q6600 B3 Revision OC to 3.0GHz
I ran Crysis in DX9 the first time I played it and it looked great and ran pretty good.
Since then I changed my old IDE Hard drive to a MUCH faster WD 640GB hard drive, plus went from 4GB (only able to use 3.2GB) memory to 8GB memory and changed OS from WinXP to Vista 64.

I downloaded the "Ultra High quality mod" from here:

Crymod Modding Portal | Crysis | Ultra High Quality Custom Config - Update to v1.3 Released


Now the game is so realistic looking I find myself staring at the graphics almost more than playing the game.

I run with everything maxed (Ultra High) and at 1600X1200 res average around 25fps in DX10 and there is a nice difference in graphics quality.

So to me DX10 is worth it.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Home Built
    CPU
    Q6600 @ 2.66ghz
    Motherboard
    Asus Maximus Formula
    Memory
    8GB Patriot PC2 6400
    Graphics Card(s)
    Geforce 8800GT 512mb
    Sound Card
    HT Omega Claro Halo
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Dell 21" 2001FP
    Screen Resolution
    1600X1200
    Hard Drives
    Western Digital 640GB 32mb cache
    PSU
    Cooler Master 750W
    Case
    Cooler Master ATC 201C-SX1
    Cooling
    Stock Intel CPU fan 4 80X80mm case fans 1 120mm case fan
    Keyboard
    Logitech G15 gaming keyboard
    Mouse
    Logitech MX Revolution
    Internet Speed
    RR cable 10Mbps with 16Mbps boost
    Other Info
    Sennheiser PC350 Headset
I got a card so I can use it for all the eye candy in crysis etc.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    HP Compaq Presario/SR5113WM
    CPU
    AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ 1.9Ghz
    Motherboard
    Asus M2N68-LA
    Memory
    PNY Optima Memory DDR2 2GB 2x1 kit
    Graphics Card(s)
    PNY Nvidia 8400 GS 256MB
    Sound Card
    On board RealTek
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Acer X163W LCD
    Screen Resolution
    1366x768
    Hard Drives
    Western Digital 160 GB SATA 3G (3.0Gb/sec)
    7200 rpm
    Western Digital 160 GB IDE
    PSU
    Dynex 400w
    Case
    Nothin Special
    Cooling
    Stock
    Keyboard
    Standard 102 key with volume and sleep buttons
    Mouse
    Wireless Logitech LX7
    Internet Speed
    Comcrap 10mb cable
    Other Info
    Insignia 2.1 speakers, wireless Xbox 360 controller w/plug n play charger, Belkin wireless G + mimo usb network adapter.
It's worth it for games like Far Cry 2, which is probably the best DX10 game there is as it gives even mid range DX10 cards a chance, and plays best at max graphics than other DX10 games like both Crysis games.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Custom Built
    CPU
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
    Motherboard
    XFX MB-750I-72P9 NF750i
    Memory
    4096MB Corsair XMS2 PC-5400
    Graphics Card(s)
    ASUS Nvidia Geforce GTX470
    Sound Card
    ASUS Xonar DX
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Dell 24" S2409W & Dell 20" E207WFP
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1080 & 1680x1050
    Hard Drives
    750GB Western Digital Caviar Black & 500GB Samsung
    PSU
    750 watt Thermaltake Toughpower
    Case
    Coolermaster Dominator 690 Nvidia Edition
    Cooling
    Zalman CNPS9700-NT Cooler, 6x 120mm Chassis Fans
    Keyboard
    Logitech G11 Keyboard
    Mouse
    Logitech G5 Laser Mouse (2007 edition)
    Internet Speed
    100Mbps
    Other Info
    abit airpace 54mbps wireless PCI-E x1 card
Back
Top