![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
br> br> |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Geek ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 16 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices FYI - Just blundered into this one over on ExtremeTech.com. Intel Cuts Core 2 Quad Processor Price in Half How does a Q6700 for $266 sound? To me it sounds about $224 better than the price I paid for my Q6600 back in the day **sigh**. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| I’m a PC ![]() Rep Power: 150 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices Was just about to post that myself.......you beat me to it lol. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Geek ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 16 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| I’m a PC ![]() Rep Power: 150 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices I think Shawn is after a Q9450 |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Banned Rep Power: 0 ![]() | Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Member Rep Power: 8 ![]() | Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices almost a year to the day from last year's massive C2D price cut, when i bought my C2D, the week before the cut. . . . I gave newegg an extra $100, piss me off. . . so now i have been waiting to get either a kentsfield or a wolfdale, not sure which sportsguy |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Geek ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 16 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices Bubba, I suppose that a primary reason for the price difference lies in the fact that Intel claims their 45-nm fabrication process is much cheaper than it was for the older 65-nm processors. Simple economics would indicate that Intel would have to continue passing these manufacturing costs along to the consumer. That Intel must now compete with the AMD Phenoms for quad-proc market share probably played a significant part in why the newer Yorkfield quads were priced cheaper than their older Kentsfield cousins as well. As Intel's 45-nm processors are starting to become more easily available (with volume shipping scheduled to begin in earnest sometime this summer), their 65-nm counterparts are now entering their "sunset years" (months really), and the newly discounted prices are most likely just a part of Intel's inventory reduction strategy. If you are a student of Moore's Law (and Darwinian "survival of the fittest" theory too I suppose), you can anticipate that the same thing will eventually happen with the Yorkfield's, and the inevitable "everything must go" price cuts will make that $325 you paid for your Q9450 seem like a huge ripoff. Such is the life for us geeks trying to stay on top of the technology curve. Somehow we always seem to forget that every component we choose to put into our systems will essentially be obsolete before the shipping carton arrives, and even realizing so, we'll continue to pay premium prices for them anyway... |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Speed problem with Intel Q6600 (Quad Core) and Ultimate 64-Bit | ajf | Vista performance & maintenance | 14 | 08-07-2008 02:11 AM |
| going quad core | chinga69 | General Discussion | 22 | 07-17-2008 11:53 PM |
| Quad core and W.L.M. | thebigdintexas | Live Messenger | 3 | 01-14-2008 09:08 PM |
| Quad Core Scheduling | Mac | Vista performance & maintenance | 2 | 09-08-2007 04:45 PM |
| Which version support dual core or quad core? | churin | Vista General | 20 | 12-01-2006 11:23 PM |