Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Forums > General Discussion

Vista - Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices

Reply
 
Old 04-21-2008   #1 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate x64 SP1
 
 

Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices

FYI - Just blundered into this one over on ExtremeTech.com.

Intel Cuts Core 2 Quad Processor Price in Half

How does a Q6700 for $266 sound? To me it sounds about $224 better than the price I paid for my Q6600 back in the day **sigh**.

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 04-21-2008   #2 (permalink)


Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 
 

Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices

Was just about to post that myself.......you beat me to it lol.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 04-21-2008   #3 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate x64 SP1
 
 

Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices

Quote  Quote: Originally Posted by z3r010 View Post
Was just about to post that myself.......you beat me to it lol.
LOL - Maybe it will help with Brink's shopping list.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 04-21-2008   #4 (permalink)


Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 
 

Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices

I think Shawn is after a Q9450
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 04-21-2008   #5 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate
 
 

Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices

Quote  Quote: Originally Posted by z3r010 View Post
I think Shawn is after a Q9450
Why is the Q6600 so much more expensive (or I guess I should say why WAS) than the Q9450? 9450 has 1333Mhz FSB, 12 and 12 MB cache as opposed to 1066 and 8 for the 6600. I think i paid $325 for my 9450 while that article was quoting the 6600 at $530.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 04-21-2008   #6 (permalink)


Vista Business x64 and XP 32
 
 

Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices

almost a year to the day from last year's massive C2D price cut, when i bought my C2D, the week before the cut. . . . I gave newegg an extra $100, piss me off. . . so now i have been waiting to get either a kentsfield or a wolfdale, not sure which

sportsguy
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 04-22-2008   #7 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate x64 SP1
 
 

Re: Intel Cuts Quad Core Prices

Quote  Quote: Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
Quote  Quote: Originally Posted by z3r010 View Post
I think Shawn is after a Q9450
Why is the Q6600 so much more expensive (or I guess I should say why WAS) than the Q9450? 9450 has 1333Mhz FSB, 12 and 12 MB cache as opposed to 1066 and 8 for the 6600. I think i paid $325 for my 9450 while that article was quoting the 6600 at $530.
Bubba,
I suppose that a primary reason for the price difference lies in the fact that Intel claims their 45-nm fabrication process is much cheaper than it was for the older 65-nm processors. Simple economics would indicate that Intel would have to continue passing these manufacturing costs along to the consumer. That Intel must now compete with the AMD Phenoms for quad-proc market share probably played a significant part in why the newer Yorkfield quads were priced cheaper than their older Kentsfield cousins as well.

As Intel's 45-nm processors are starting to become more easily available (with volume shipping scheduled to begin in earnest sometime this summer), their 65-nm counterparts are now entering their "sunset years" (months really), and the newly discounted prices are most likely just a part of Intel's inventory reduction strategy. If you are a student of Moore's Law (and Darwinian "survival of the fittest" theory too I suppose), you can anticipate that the same thing will eventually happen with the Yorkfield's, and the inevitable "everything must go" price cuts will make that $325 you paid for your Q9450 seem like a huge ripoff.

Such is the life for us geeks trying to stay on top of the technology curve. Somehow we always seem to forget that every component we choose to put into our systems will essentially be obsolete before the shipping carton arrives, and even realizing so, we'll continue to pay premium prices for them anyway...
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Speed problem with Intel Q6600 (Quad Core) and Ultimate 64-Bit Vista performance & maintenance
Q9650 Intel Quad Core listed as unknown device? General Discussion
Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1 On Intel Core Quad Virtual Server
Intel: Core i7 to Be Up to 52% Faster Compared to Core 2 Quad. Vista News
Which version support dual core or quad core? Vista General


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46