![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Resistance is Futile ![]() | Non-Paged Kernel Memory In Windows XP, there was a registry setting that when set prevented the Kernel from being paged out to the swapfile. I don't remember what this specific key was, but does anybody know of a similar setting for Vista x64? I was just curious... |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| The Contemplator ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008 Vista Home Premium 32-bit & Vista Ultimate 64-bit both Service Pack 2 W7 Ultimate RC 7229 32 & 64 | Re: Non-Paged Kernel Memory Hi Peter, The key is still there in the registry. The default value is 0, but you will need to set it to 1. Code: Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management] "DisablePagingExecutive"=dword:00000001 |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Resistance is Futile ![]() | Re: Non-Paged Kernel Memory Thanks, Dwarf. I want to do some benchmarking both with and without the kernel locked into memory, so I can gauge the impact on performance, if any. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Member ![]() ![]() | Re: Non-Paged Kernel Memory nice one....can you post your results back here?? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Resistance is Futile ![]() | Re: Non-Paged Kernel Memory I downloaded and installed Geekbench 2.0.19, and here are the results that I got: Before Locking the Vista Kernel : 3550 After Locking the Vista Kernel : 3607 Not a huge increase in overall score, but the system does feel more responsive. Maybe the results differences would be more profound if I increased memory from 4GB to 8GB. And desktop availability from login would also appear to happen a little more quickly than usual. I've attached the Geekbench results files. I don't have a Geekbench serial number, so I cannot perform the 64-Bit benchmarks. |
My System Specs![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Urgent Help: Page Fault in Non Paged Area | ivars | General Discussion | 16 | 11-05-2008 07:45 PM |
| Vista Ultimate 64 BSOD 0x00000050 PAGED FAULT IN NON PAGED AREA | Michael R. Mastro II | Vista hardware & devices | 1 | 10-17-2008 04:46 PM |
| Re: Vista Ultimate 64 BSOD 0x00000050 PAGED FAULT IN NON PAGED AREA | Chuck | Vista General | 0 | 10-17-2008 04:46 PM |
| BSOD page fault in none paged area | timjcur | General Discussion | 2 | 07-22-2008 07:23 PM |
| page fault in non paged area | lilredexec | Vista General | 2 | 11-18-2007 02:10 AM |