Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Forums > General Discussion

Vista - installed physical memory vs total physical memory

Reply
 
Old 07-07-2009   #1 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate x64
 
 

installed physical memory vs total physical memory

Can anyone tell me if this looks normal for Windows Vista 64? I have 8 gigs of installed memory but only 4 gigs of total memory. I checked Bios and I do not see an option to change my RAM. This is what I found in MSCONFIG:

Installed Physical Memory (RAM) 8.00 GB
Total Physical Memory 4.00 GB
Available Physical Memory 6.47 GB
Total Virtual Memory 16.0 GB
Available Virtual Memory 14.4 GB

system properties:
Processor: Intel(R) CORE(TM)2 Extreme CPU X9650 @ 3.00 GHz 3.00 GHz

Rating: 5.9
Memory (RAM): 8.00GB
System Type: 64-bit Operating System

I am using 64 bit vista ultimate

Thanks

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-07-2009   #2 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate X64, Windows 7 X64, XP Pro X64, Vista Home Premium X86
 
 

Re: installed physical memory vs total physical memory

well do you have a seperate video card or is it on board? if it is on board it will use some of your ram for video. some for sound.

but it still looks a little low to me.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-07-2009   #3 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate x64
 
 

Re: installed physical memory vs total physical memory

Thanks for the reply.

I am using a ge force 9800 gx2. I am concerned because my installed memory is lower than total memory. It seems Windows is seeing the memory, but for some reason only using 4 of the 8 gigs. I am not sure why available is showing 6 gigs if total memory only equals 4.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-07-2009   #4 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate X64, Windows 7 X64, XP Pro X64, Vista Home Premium X86
 
 

Re: installed physical memory vs total physical memory

not sure will see what i can find.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-07-2009   #5 (permalink)


vista64
 
 

Re: installed physical memory vs total physical memory

I've got 8gig at home and msconfig.exe does the same to me. Even when I run the 64bit version.

Best advice: Ignore it, and instead pay attention to what you see reported in the Task Manager. Msconfig.exe is probably making some sort of legacy API call for the "Total Memory" field, which will never report more than 4gig.

The "Available Memory" field in msconfig.exe is nothing more than the amount of unused memory. The same thing you'd see in the "free" field of the Task Manager.


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-07-2009   #6 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate x64
 
 

Re: installed physical memory vs total physical memory

Itwally, Thanks a lot.

That makes sense, I was hoping it was something that simple. My task manager looks just like yours so it should be OK.


Fadedrs,

Thanks for looking into this for me as well. If you run in to anything that could shed anymore light on this please let me know.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-08-2009   #7 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate x64
 
 

Re: installed physical memory vs total physical memory

Itwally,

I just got home and am looking at my Performance. I don't have much running but I show I have only 31 MB free and 7116 cached. I see you have over 4000 free. Do I need to do any tweeking to get my system in line? I am very new to troubleshooting and don't know much about different memory types. This is what mine looks like now:

Total 8189
Cached 7093
Free 20

cpu usage is at 0% Memory usage is at 1.50 gb
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-08-2009   #8 (permalink)


vista64
 
 

Re: installed physical memory vs total physical memory

Vista includes the Superfetch service, which works as an aggressive caching system. The memory used by the superfetch goes under the heading of "cached". So, a heavy cache is a good thing. It means that your system memory is being put to use, even when you're idle.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-08-2009   #9 (permalink)


Vista Ultimate x64
 
 

Re: installed physical memory vs total physical memory

Ok thanks very much
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 07-08-2009   #10 (permalink)


Vista home premium 32bit
 
 

Re: installed physical memory vs total physical memory

jspencer, you worry too much. Everything on your system looks quite normal - it actually looks superb.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Total vs Available Physical Memory Prob General Discussion
Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory Vista General
Installed Physical Memory/Total Physical Memory Vista installation & setup
Installed/Total Physical Memory Discrepancies General Discussion
Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value? Vista General


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46