![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| XP, Linux x64, Vista x64 | Re: Window Experience Index Scores whats the highest score you can get? 5.9? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Vista x64 Ultimate SP2, Windows 7 Ultimate x64 | Re: Window Experience Index Scores Hi Choogster, Yes, for now 5.9 is the highest you can get until Microsoft updates the Window Experience Index Score to reflect changing systems over time. Shawn |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| XP, Linux x64, Vista x64 | Re: Window Experience Index Scores thats a strange number to have - you would expect 10 to be the ceiling |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Vista x64 Ultimate SP2, Windows 7 Ultimate x64 | Re: Window Experience Index Scores It would make more sense, and make things easier to gauge. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| OS X/Vista Home Premium x86/Vista Ultimate x64 | Re: Window Experience Index Scores I know there are some good posts regarding Windows Experience Score if you want to know more about it. Here's my summary of understanding: When Vista was released, 5.0 was the highest score achievable based on the best hardware available at the time. I would guess they are using standard benchmarking tools and just readjusting the top end score as hardware improves - hence all the 5.9s. So your processor is being rated against whatever processor happened to be the best when they bumped the score to 5.9 - note the Q-based machines are hitting the top. As for RAM, it appears to have less to do with quantity and more to do with throughput (operations per second), which encompasses far more than the sticks you have installed. My primary hard drive (WD Raptor) most likely IS the current benchmark and explains the 5.9. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| Windows 7 Ultimate x64 | Re: Window Experience Index Scores Ahh that explains a lot, TBH when Vista came out I didn't pay much attention to the scores as my system was crap, now I'm at phase 2 of my new rig benchmarks and scores are at the top of my list. I think a pair of raptors will be put on order next pay day |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Windows Vista X64 | Re: Window Experience Index Scores ^Either that or if you wanna save some money get the Seagate 250GB Single Platter Drives,very very fast ,give the more EXPENSIVE Raptors a run for their money |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| OS X/Vista Home Premium x86/Vista Ultimate x64 | Re: Window Experience Index Scores Raptors are noisy also, if that's a problem for you. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Windows 7 Ultimate x64 | Re: Window Experience Index Scores I'm just trying to silence my system, so it looks like the raptors could be out then |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| | Re: Window Experience Index Scores ok, i am in. How do i post the result here? thanks François |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| How to hack your Windows Experience Index scores | Tutorials | |||
| Low experience rating scores | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Windows Experience Index Scores not showing | Vista General | |||
| Flaky Window Experience Index Aero Test | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Window Vista Experience index base scores !! | Vista performance & maintenance | |||