frame rates

gazz496

a mere mortal
Vista Pro
it's a query from looking at where pc mags seem to get their frame rate's from??

i read a review of an hd 3870 same as the one i use oddly enough that got less than half the avg fps i get while playing games like crysis and supreme commander and the like and they marked it down for this yet a comfortably manage a decent 40-45 fps in crysis on high yet these mags have it at less than 20 in some cases.

i know i am going to regret saying this but are these magzines being payed off or something cause some of the low end nvdia cards were outperforming the 3870 x2 as well according to these loons which i am sure even an nvidia enthusiast will agree is a wee bit silly. considering the x2 performs nearly as well if not better in some cases than even the top nvidia card last i checked at least not including their gx2 thingy

so where do they get thier results from and how as buyers are we supposed to judge what to buy if the magazines are misrepresenting the kit it's a shame.

thanks for reading and if you have any comments please feal free to leave them too i would be interested to know if others are experencing higher frame rates than the so called experts say we should get !!
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    me
    CPU
    intel Q6600 @3.0Ghz
    Motherboard
    gigabyte EP35C DS3R
    Memory
    8 GB OCZ 1066 HPC REAPER
    Graphics Card(s)
    Sapphire 4870 HD 1024mb gddr5
    Monitor(s) Displays
    lg flatron 20.1
    Screen Resolution
    1680x1050
    Hard Drives
    western digital 350gb
    samsung spinpoint 120gb
    PSU
    900w
    Case
    thermaltake aguila
    Cooling
    2x 120mm 2x 10cm
Check the settings for what they tested at. Despite their advantages in some other areas, ATI cards are notoriously mediocre at anti-aliasing. Putting AA at 4 is an easy way to kill scores for an ATI card. To make up for it, most of us just use a higher resolution, which resolves most of the issue anyway.

Personally, I'm running a pair of 3870 Toxics in Crossfire right now. I've had no issues and don't put a lot of faith in the magazines. Chipsets make a difference, CPUs make a difference, the way the particular program was written makes a difference, and so on ad inifinitum. I've had friends argue this with me a lot, but I'm inclined to believe that a lot of those "definitive tests" are skewed in nVidia's favor, since my ATI cards can beat theirs in situations that aren't tested in the mags.

Just my two cents worth, though.
 

My Computer

nope i agree
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    me
    CPU
    intel Q6600 @3.0Ghz
    Motherboard
    gigabyte EP35C DS3R
    Memory
    8 GB OCZ 1066 HPC REAPER
    Graphics Card(s)
    Sapphire 4870 HD 1024mb gddr5
    Monitor(s) Displays
    lg flatron 20.1
    Screen Resolution
    1680x1050
    Hard Drives
    western digital 350gb
    samsung spinpoint 120gb
    PSU
    900w
    Case
    thermaltake aguila
    Cooling
    2x 120mm 2x 10cm
Back
Top