Vista - Is ethernet much slower that USB 2.0?

**nate42nd** · 03-04-2009

I have been told ethernet to a networked computer 6 feet away would be WAY faster than USB 2.0 to a Seagate FreeAgent 250GB HD. I just created two images of my HD using both. The ethernet took 2.5 hours. The USB to the HD took 31 minutes. Is USB 2.0 much faster than ethernet or do I have something wrong with my router or some other problem?

**kword88** · 03-04-2009

usb IS faster

**Dwarf** · 03-04-2009

USB is the faster interface. However, where the ethernet connected HDD comes into its own is that it is accessible from ALL machines connected to that network whereas a USB connected device is only accessible to the machine that it is directly connected to (and to the rest of the network if sharing is enabled BUT only if the host computer is switched on).

**nate42nd** · 03-04-2009

Thanks guys. I thought I had a problem. That does explain what happened. Sound like on a home network....my little Seagate 250GB USB HD will be just fine. I have only had it for 6 hours and I love it already. These are good little drives for the $$. Got mine at WalMart on sale for $67. Wish it was 7200 rpm though.
Walmart.com: Seagate FreeAgent GO Portable Hard Drive, 250GB 5400RPM - Sky Blue: Computers

03-04-2009	#1 (permalink)
nate42nd Windows 7 x64 (7229) 219 posts	Is ethernet much slower that USB 2.0? I have been told ethernet to a networked computer 6 feet away would be WAY faster than USB 2.0 to a Seagate FreeAgent 250GB HD. I just created two images of my HD using both. The ethernet took 2.5 hours. The USB to the HD took 31 minutes. Is USB 2.0 much faster than ethernet or do I have something wrong with my router or some other problem?
My System Specs

03-04-2009	#2 (permalink)
kword88 vista ultimate 32bit,64bit,Seven Ultimate 64bit 331 posts	Re: Is ethernet much slower that USB 2.0? usb IS faster
My System Specs

03-04-2009	#3 (permalink)
Dwarf Vista Home Premium 32-bit & Vista Ultimate 64-bit both Service Pack 2 W7 Pro RTM 7600 32 & 64 2,181 posts	Re: Is ethernet much slower that USB 2.0? USB is the faster interface. However, where the ethernet connected HDD comes into its own is that it is accessible from ALL machines connected to that network whereas a USB connected device is only accessible to the machine that it is directly connected to (and to the rest of the network if sharing is enabled BUT only if the host computer is switched on).
My System Specs

03-04-2009	#4 (permalink)
nate42nd Windows 7 x64 (7229) 219 posts	Re: Is ethernet much slower that USB 2.0? Thanks guys. I thought I had a problem. That does explain what happened. Sound like on a home network....my little Seagate 250GB USB HD will be just fine. I have only had it for 6 hours and I love it already. These are good little drives for the $$. Got mine at WalMart on sale for $67. Wish it was 7200 rpm though. Walmart.com: Seagate FreeAgent GO Portable Hard Drive, 250GB 5400RPM - Sky Blue: Computers
My System Specs

Similar Threads
Thread	Forum
Vista Copy Speed over the network is slower that XP SP2 and OSX..much slower?	Vista General
Vista Copy Speed over the network is slower that XP SP2 and OSX..much slower?	Vista networking & sharing
Vista machine getting slower and slower everyday	Vista General
Gets slower & slower until I have to reboot	Vista General
vista slower and slower startup	Vista performance & maintenance