![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Linux | Best c++ compiler compatible with Vista 64bit? Anyone? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Win7x64 | Re: Best c++ compiler compatible with Vista 64bit? There's no such thing as the "best" compiler because the task is far too complex and multi-dimensional. It's like asking who's best at maths ![]() Any compiler you've actually heard of will be perfectly fine. If it makes you feel better, inefficiencies introduced by your code are going to outweigh compiler inadequacies by several orders of magnitude. Nothing personal - I'm in the same category with you. Is there a problem you're trying to solve? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Linux | Re: Best c++ compiler compatible with Vista 64bit? There's no such thing as the "best" compiler because the task is far too complex and multi-dimensional. It's like asking who's best at maths ![]() Any compiler you've actually heard of will be perfectly fine. If it makes you feel better, inefficiencies introduced by your code are going to outweigh compiler inadequacies by several orders of magnitude. Nothing personal - I'm in the same category with you. Is there a problem you're trying to solve? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Win7x64 | Re: Best c++ compiler compatible with Vista 64bit? There's no such thing as the "best" compiler because the task is far too complex and multi-dimensional. It's like asking who's best at maths ![]() Any compiler you've actually heard of will be perfectly fine. If it makes you feel better, inefficiencies introduced by your code are going to outweigh compiler inadequacies by several orders of magnitude. Nothing personal - I'm in the same category with you. Is there a problem you're trying to solve? Java is a bytecode language, meaning it requires a JVM to execute the intermediate bytecode that's produced by a "compiler". By some strict definition, the JVM is an on-the-fly compiler. www.sun.com will have what you need - the development environment, plus the JVM. C++ is a superset of C which means that any C++ compiler will handle C as well. The converse is not true, but you'd be hard-pressed to find a C-only compiler for Windows in general use nowadays. MS Visual Studio comes in a C++ "Express" flavour which is free. VBScript is interpreted, not compiled. VBSCRIPT.DLL performs the actions specified in a vbs script. You don't need any additional "compilers" - all the necessary components are built into the OS. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Producer 2003 compatible with Vista 64bit? | Software | |||
| Flashget or Getright compatible for Vista 64bit? | Software | |||
| Vista 64bit ultimate - need a compatible wireless card | Vista General | |||
| Re: compatible remote controls for Vista 32/64bit betas | Vista hardware & devices | |||
| Re: compatible remote controls for Vista 32/64bit betas | Vista hardware & devices | |||