RAID Explained...

SMOKKINU

On the starting line
Power User
I had a PM from a new member here, asking me about my RAID 0 setup with my two velociraptor HDD setup...i figured I would shaire my response with the rest of the forum, to explain what RAID 0 and RAID 1 is, and help you to decide what is right for you if you decide to attempt a RAID setup on your own computer.


Foregive my grammar, lack of punctuation, etc...but I believe i put it in leymans terms, so everybody can understand it :)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RAID 0 basically makes 2 (Identical, they MUST be identical hard drives, model number and all) work in tandem... data, that is written, and read off of the drive, is written in 128kb "stripes", though you can change the stripe size to 64kb, or even 32kb... 64kb is probly the fastest, but i am running at 128kb stripe size...

anyway, say you have a 1gig file, in RAID0, that file is stored on both HDD, in tandem, written in 128kb chunks back and forth. thus making each HDD, only having to write 500mb, vs. the same HDD by itself, having to write the entire 1gb. so you cut the read/write time by essentially almost half...but not really... there is some latency involved, but RAID0 def beats out a single HDD.

If you got the money, go grab yourself two velociraptors, and run those in RAID0, its nice ;-)

Now, the other advantage to RAID0, is your essentially taking 2 hard drives, and creating one single large HDD. so windows see's my two 300gb raptors, as a 600gb HDD.

Then, there is RAID 1, raid 1, is a "Mirror" and is excellent for data security...if 1 hard drive fails, all of your data is still mirrored on the other, and you lose nothing. there is no performance increase, and you also do not gain any HDD space either...so if you take two 500gb HDD, and run them in RAID 1, your system still only has 500gb Hard drive space...it's just copying every single file, twice. It doesnt make it slower, it just makes it more secure if you are the type of person who values the files on their computer.

There is other RAID types, which essentially combine RAID 0 and RAID 1, but those setups require multiple Hard Drives of the identical model, and can get pretty pricey, unless you got the dough.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Myself
    CPU
    Intel Core i7 920
    Motherboard
    ASUS P6T Deluxe
    Memory
    6gb MUSHKIN DDR3 1866
    Graphics Card(s)
    TWO x EVGA NVidia GTX 285
    Sound Card
    Soundblaster Extreme
    Monitor(s) Displays
    ASUS 24inch 2ms LCD
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1080
    Hard Drives
    4 x OCZ Vertex 60GB, 1 x Western Digital Velociraptor 300GB, 1TB Western Digital Caviar Black
    PSU
    Corsair 1000W
    Case
    Coolermaster HAF 932
    Cooling
    Water cooled
    Keyboard
    Saitek Cyborg Deluxe
    Mouse
    Microsoft Regular USB w/wheel
    Internet Speed
    Cable 15mbps
Oh, one thing to note, creating a RAID setup, of any type, you WILL need to start fresh, so backup any files/folders that are important before attempting such a setup, because a format, of both HDD is required to create a RAID Array.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Myself
    CPU
    Intel Core i7 920
    Motherboard
    ASUS P6T Deluxe
    Memory
    6gb MUSHKIN DDR3 1866
    Graphics Card(s)
    TWO x EVGA NVidia GTX 285
    Sound Card
    Soundblaster Extreme
    Monitor(s) Displays
    ASUS 24inch 2ms LCD
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1080
    Hard Drives
    4 x OCZ Vertex 60GB, 1 x Western Digital Velociraptor 300GB, 1TB Western Digital Caviar Black
    PSU
    Corsair 1000W
    Case
    Coolermaster HAF 932
    Cooling
    Water cooled
    Keyboard
    Saitek Cyborg Deluxe
    Mouse
    Microsoft Regular USB w/wheel
    Internet Speed
    Cable 15mbps
Thanks. I may be old fashioned but I would prefer not to use RAID at all, but I see many PC vendors now don't give you any choice, it's either RAID 0 or 1...or nothing. Alienware's top of the line model ALX X58 for instance, which I have my eye on.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Operating System
    Win 10 Pro x64 x 2
    Manufacturer/Model
    Alienware ALX x58
    CPU
    Intel® Core™ i7-975 Extreme O/C to 4.02 GHz, 8MB Cache
    Motherboard
    Asus® P6T Deluxe V2 X58 LGA1366
    Memory
    24GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 SDRAM at 1600MHz - 6 x 4096MB
    Graphics Card(s)
    1792 MB NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 295 Dual Core
    Sound Card
    Onboard Soundmax® High-Definition 7.1 Performance Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Samsung XL2370 HD LED backlit 23" W/S 2ms response time
    Screen Resolution
    1920 x 1080
    Hard Drives
    2 x 500gb SATA II
    1 x 1TB SATA II
    1 external eSATA LaCie 3TB
    (Non-RAID)
    PSU
    Alienware® 1200 Watt Multi-GPU
    Case
    Unique
    Cooling
    4 case fans @ CPU water cooling.
    Internet Speed
    1gb/s up and down
I had a PM from a new member here, asking me about my RAID 0 setup with my two velociraptor HDD setup...i figured I would shaire my response with the rest of the forum, to explain what RAID 0 and RAID 1 is, and help you to decide what is right for you if you decide to attempt a RAID setup on your own computer.


Foregive my grammar, lack of punctuation, etc...but I believe i put it in leymans terms, so everybody can understand it :)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RAID 0 basically makes 2 (Identical, they MUST be identical hard drives, model number and all) work in tandem... data, that is written, and read off of the drive, is written in 128kb "stripes", though you can change the stripe size to 64kb, or even 32kb... 64kb is probly the fastest, but i am running at 128kb stripe size...

anyway, say you have a 1gig file, in RAID0, that file is stored on both HDD, in tandem, written in 128kb chunks back and forth. thus making each HDD, only having to write 500mb, vs. the same HDD by itself, having to write the entire 1gb. so you cut the read/write time by essentially almost half...but not really... there is some latency involved, but RAID0 def beats out a single HDD.

If you got the money, go grab yourself two velociraptors, and run those in RAID0, its nice ;-)

Now, the other advantage to RAID0, is your essentially taking 2 hard drives, and creating one single large HDD. so windows see's my two 300gb raptors, as a 600gb HDD.

Then, there is RAID 1, raid 1, is a "Mirror" and is excellent for data security...if 1 hard drive fails, all of your data is still mirrored on the other, and you lose nothing. there is no performance increase, and you also do not gain any HDD space either...so if you take two 500gb HDD, and run them in RAID 1, your system still only has 500gb Hard drive space...it's just copying every single file, twice. It doesnt make it slower, it just makes it more secure if you are the type of person who values the files on their computer.

There is other RAID types, which essentially combine RAID 0 and RAID 1, but those setups require multiple Hard Drives of the identical model, and can get pretty pricey, unless you got the dough.

Great post. Have rep :)

Depending on the implementation, disks don't have to be identical to function in a RAID 0 set.

Also, RAID 1 does confer a performance advantage. There are now two disks containing the same data, and one of them will have its head assembly closer to the target track and sector than the other one. Hence, seek time and rotational delay will be reduced somewhat.
 

My Computer

Hi

I was told ones that you should be careful with "Raid 0" since a failur on one of the diskes destroys all the data on both diskes, and that failurs occur more frequently in "Raid 0" then they would in non Raid setups. Also if a normal disks fails you have a chance to recover the data with some software, this is not true for the raid setup... Or am I wrong?

Is there not a setup where you run two diskes like in "Raid 0" and have one extra disk for mirroring? Maybe Raid 2 or something...

Thanks for a great post by the why :D
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    mm-vision.dk (XForce)
    CPU
    Intel Core i7 965 3.20GHz
    Motherboard
    Gigabyte EX58-UD4P
    Memory
    12Gb Kingston 1333MHz DDR3 CL9 DIMM (6 x 2Gb)
    Graphics Card(s)
    GForce GTX 295
    Sound Card
    Realtek High Definition Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Viewsonic VX2260wm
    Screen Resolution
    1,920 x 1,080
    Hard Drives
    1 x WD VelociRaptor WD1500HLFS 150 GB 10000rpm
    2 x Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5 TB 7200rpm
    PSU
    Corsair TX750W
    Case
    SilverStone KL01B-W
    Cooling
    Stock
    Keyboard
    Roccat VALO
    Mouse
    Logitech G5
    Internet Speed
    12Mbit / 1Mbit
I was told ones that you should be careful with "Raid 0" since a failur on one of the diskes destroys all the data on both diskes, and that failurs occur more frequently in "Raid 0" then they would in non Raid setups.

If the likelihood of a given disk model failing within the year is say 10%, then using two of them in a RAID 0 stripe set increases the failure risk to 19% ( 1 - [0.9]^2 ). Three of them in the stripe set, and the risk goes up to 27.1, and so on...

Strictly speaking, RAID 0 is not RAID at all. There is no Redundancy in that configuration.

Also if a normal disks fails you have a chance to recover the data with some software, this is not true for the raid setup... Or am I wrong?

In both cases, it depends on what exactly failed. If it's a complete failure at a hardware level, recovery software ain't gonna help either way. If the partition definition is somehow damaged, or the file system metadata, then assuming there's nothing wrong with the underlying hardware the data is potentially salvageable in both instances.

Is there not a setup where you run two diskes like in "Raid 0" and have one extra disk for mirroring? Maybe Raid 2 or something...

Sure, you can mirror two RAID 0 sets, and that goes by a variety of technically-incorrect names ;)

Most larger hardware RAID arrays use RAID 5 as the basic building element. Again, it's a stripe set, except that for any given stripe across the disks one of the disks contains only parity information which can be used to reconstruct the original data should any single disk fail. The setup is truly "redundant" in the sense that it is fault tolerant. With massive hardware controllers it can come close to providing the speed of RAID 0 while still being as safe as RAID 1 - two disks must die (without replacement) before the data is completely lost.
 

My Computer

I am fairly new to all of this but my present computer came with two 500gb drives configured in a RAID O. They benchmark pretty fast and they have not failed (yet). A friend of mine has been experimenting with both Software based Raid O & 5 And the same with a PCI RAID controller. In his testing there seems to be a bottleneck at the PCI limiting his read/write speeds. Same drives in the same setup can achieve faster read/write speeds with the software based RAID (mostly when using 3 or more drives). It seems 150MB/s is the max on his PCI where he was able to get up to 240MB/s with 4 drives in a RAID 0?

I repeat I am new to all this so please correct me on anything I am saying. My thoughts are there are no real advantages with the RAID 0 (striped) because you are limited by what you are writing to or from. I understand if you were copying to or from multiple sources (I do have 2 external ESata ports) the RAID may handle the faster read/write in that situation. Most of the time I am only writing to a single non raid hard drive (either internal or external) and am limited by that drives read/write speed?

What advantage does the speed of RAID 0 have, what uses or aplications for the average user would this benefit. If I ever have to do a fresh install I am considering not going with RAID the next time around unless I am missing something?
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    IPSG E371
    CPU
    Q6700
    Motherboard
    Intel DP35DP
    Memory
    4Gb
    Graphics Card(s)
    GeForce 8800GT
    Sound Card
    Integrated Sigmatel 9271D 8channel
    Monitor(s) Displays
    24 in Sceptre
    Screen Resolution
    1920 X 1200
    Hard Drives
    1TB Raid 0 (2X 500)
    1X 1.5TB internal
    1X 1.5TB external
    PSU
    650watt
    Case
    coolermaster cheapy
    Keyboard
    microsoft 3000
    Mouse
    logitech wireless tracball
    Internet Speed
    DSL
    Other Info
    bluray

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Dwarf Dwf/11/2012 r09/2013
    CPU
    Intel Core-i5-3570K 4-core @ 3.4GHz (Ivy Bridge) (OC 4.2GHz)
    Motherboard
    ASRock Z77 Extreme4-M
    Memory
    4 x 4GB DDR3-1600 Corsair Vengeance CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9B (16GB)
    Graphics Card(s)
    MSI GeForce GTX770 Gaming OC 2GB
    Sound Card
    Realtek High Definition on board solution (ALC 898)
    Monitor(s) Displays
    ViewSonic VA1912w Widescreen
    Screen Resolution
    1440x900
    Hard Drives
    OCZ Agility 3 120GB SATA III x2 (RAID 0)
    Samsung HD501LJ 500GB SATA II x2
    Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB SATA II
    Iomega 1.5TB Ext USB 2.0
    WD 2.0TB Ext USB 3.0
    PSU
    XFX Pro Series 850W Semi-Modular
    Case
    Gigabyte IF233
    Cooling
    1 x 120mm Front Inlet 1 x 120mm Rear Exhaust
    Keyboard
    Microsoft Comfort Curve Keyboard 3000 (USB)
    Mouse
    Microsoft Comfort Mouse 3000 for Business (USB)
    Internet Speed
    NetGear DG834Gv3 ADSL Modem/Router (Ethernet) ~4.0 Mb/s (O2)
    Other Info
    Optical Drive: HL-DT-ST BD-RE BH10LS30 SATA Bluray
    Lexmark S305 Printer/Scanner/Copier (USB)
    WEI Score: 8.1/8.1/8.5/8.5/8.25
    Asus Eee PC 1011PX Netbook (Windows 7 x86 Starter)
Thanks for your input guys... I now have a better understanding then I did before...
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    mm-vision.dk (XForce)
    CPU
    Intel Core i7 965 3.20GHz
    Motherboard
    Gigabyte EX58-UD4P
    Memory
    12Gb Kingston 1333MHz DDR3 CL9 DIMM (6 x 2Gb)
    Graphics Card(s)
    GForce GTX 295
    Sound Card
    Realtek High Definition Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Viewsonic VX2260wm
    Screen Resolution
    1,920 x 1,080
    Hard Drives
    1 x WD VelociRaptor WD1500HLFS 150 GB 10000rpm
    2 x Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5 TB 7200rpm
    PSU
    Corsair TX750W
    Case
    SilverStone KL01B-W
    Cooling
    Stock
    Keyboard
    Roccat VALO
    Mouse
    Logitech G5
    Internet Speed
    12Mbit / 1Mbit
Do you think they'd laugh at me if I asked for a non-RAID setup when ordering a machine from Alienware?
(It isn't an option when ordering online but I would imagine one could get it by phoning instead).
The reason I'm cagey about RAID is that I read so many tales of misery when people are trying to reinstall or repair their systems and some RAID driver or other is missing that has to be installed first. Plus with RAID 0 an HDD or RAID controller failure causes a total loss of data.
I would just like what I have now. Plain old SATA HDD's whose total capacity is available to me whenever.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Operating System
    Win 10 Pro x64 x 2
    Manufacturer/Model
    Alienware ALX x58
    CPU
    Intel® Core™ i7-975 Extreme O/C to 4.02 GHz, 8MB Cache
    Motherboard
    Asus® P6T Deluxe V2 X58 LGA1366
    Memory
    24GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 SDRAM at 1600MHz - 6 x 4096MB
    Graphics Card(s)
    1792 MB NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 295 Dual Core
    Sound Card
    Onboard Soundmax® High-Definition 7.1 Performance Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Samsung XL2370 HD LED backlit 23" W/S 2ms response time
    Screen Resolution
    1920 x 1080
    Hard Drives
    2 x 500gb SATA II
    1 x 1TB SATA II
    1 external eSATA LaCie 3TB
    (Non-RAID)
    PSU
    Alienware® 1200 Watt Multi-GPU
    Case
    Unique
    Cooling
    4 case fans @ CPU water cooling.
    Internet Speed
    1gb/s up and down
I was told ones that you should be careful with "Raid 0" since a failur on one of the diskes destroys all the data on both diskes, and that failurs occur more frequently in "Raid 0" then they would in non Raid setups.

If the likelihood of a given disk model failing within the year is say 10%, then using two of them in a RAID 0 stripe set increases the failure risk to 19% ( 1 - [0.9]^2 ). Three of them in the stripe set, and the risk goes up to 27.1, and so on...

Strictly speaking, RAID 0 is not RAID at all. There is no Redundancy in that configuration.

Also if a normal disks fails you have a chance to recover the data with some software, this is not true for the raid setup... Or am I wrong?

In both cases, it depends on what exactly failed. If it's a complete failure at a hardware level, recovery software ain't gonna help either way. If the partition definition is somehow damaged, or the file system metadata, then assuming there's nothing wrong with the underlying hardware the data is potentially salvageable in both instances.

Is there not a setup where you run two diskes like in "Raid 0" and have one extra disk for mirroring? Maybe Raid 2 or something...

Sure, you can mirror two RAID 0 sets, and that goes by a variety of technically-incorrect names ;)

Most larger hardware RAID arrays use RAID 5 as the basic building element. Again, it's a stripe set, except that for any given stripe across the disks one of the disks contains only parity information which can be used to reconstruct the original data should any single disk fail. The setup is truly "redundant" in the sense that it is fault tolerant. With massive hardware controllers it can come close to providing the speed of RAID 0 while still being as safe as RAID 1 - two disks must die (without replacement) before the data is completely lost.
With RAID 5, assuming n as the number of drives involved and size as the size of the smaller disk, you have (n - 1) * size space for data. By the way, parity information isn't contained in only one disk, but in every 1 / n portion of every disk. So if you have 3 disks, every third of every disk contains parity information.
 

My Computer

System One

  • CPU
    AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+
    Motherboard
    Asus M2N-E SLI
    Memory
    4 GB
    Graphics Card(s)
    2 x NVidia 8600 GTS
    Sound Card
    Integrated CM-6501
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Benq 19" + LG 17"
    Screen Resolution
    1280x1024@32bit@75MHz
    Hard Drives
    1 x Seagate 120GB SATA (OS installation)
    1 x Seagate 200GB SATA
    2 x Seagate 320GB SATA (Hardware RAID 0)
    1 x Seagate 250GB IDE (in external USB box)
    1 x TrekStor 750GB USB
    PSU
    650W
    Keyboard
    Logitech Cordless Desktop EX 100
    Mouse
    Logitech Cordless Optical
    Internet Speed
    8192 kbps / 640 kbps
Hello Exbrit,

Do not worry about the RAID0 setup, I'm running it without any problem. I guess the important thing is to create raid with two brand new drives, not just to add the new one to old drive and make them run in raid.
Btw, you can always break the raid setup and set your disks in the conventional one, if you worry about your data and the Alienware sell machines with raid, only. The most important thing when you have the RAID0 is to make the frequent backup.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Gateway P7805u FX
    CPU
    Intel Core2Duo T9600 2.80GHz 1066MHz FSB
    Motherboard
    Intel PM45
    Memory
    8GB 1066MHz DDR3
    Graphics Card(s)
    Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTS 1GB DDR3
    Monitor(s) Displays
    LG 17" WUXGA TFT
    Screen Resolution
    1920x 1200
    Hard Drives
    WD 2x500GB
    Case
    notebook
    Other Info
    BT/BD
Hello Exbrit,

Do not worry about the RAID0 setup, I'm running it without any problem. I guess the important thing is to create raid with two brand new drives, not just to add the new one to old drive and make them run in raid.
Btw, you can always break the raid setup and set your disks in the conventional one, if you worry about your data and the Alienware sell machines with raid, only. The most important thing when you have the RAID0 is to make the frequent backup.


Thanks, I guess I should "go with the flow", as they say, and adopt RAID. With RAID are there any things one has to be aware of if one is repairing or reinstalling Vista?
 

My Computer

System One

  • Operating System
    Win 10 Pro x64 x 2
    Manufacturer/Model
    Alienware ALX x58
    CPU
    Intel® Core™ i7-975 Extreme O/C to 4.02 GHz, 8MB Cache
    Motherboard
    Asus® P6T Deluxe V2 X58 LGA1366
    Memory
    24GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 SDRAM at 1600MHz - 6 x 4096MB
    Graphics Card(s)
    1792 MB NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 295 Dual Core
    Sound Card
    Onboard Soundmax® High-Definition 7.1 Performance Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Samsung XL2370 HD LED backlit 23" W/S 2ms response time
    Screen Resolution
    1920 x 1080
    Hard Drives
    2 x 500gb SATA II
    1 x 1TB SATA II
    1 external eSATA LaCie 3TB
    (Non-RAID)
    PSU
    Alienware® 1200 Watt Multi-GPU
    Case
    Unique
    Cooling
    4 case fans @ CPU water cooling.
    Internet Speed
    1gb/s up and down
...
Most larger hardware RAID arrays use RAID 5 as the basic building element. Again, it's a stripe set, except that for any given stripe across the disks one of the disks contains only parity information which can be used to reconstruct the original data should any single disk fail. The setup is truly "redundant" in the sense that it is fault tolerant. With massive hardware controllers it can come close to providing the speed of RAID 0 while still being as safe as RAID 1 - two disks must die (without replacement) before the data is completely lost.
With RAID 5, assuming n as the number of drives involved and size as the size of the smaller disk, you have (n - 1) * size space for data. By the way, parity information isn't contained in only one disk, but in every 1 / n portion of every disk. So if you have 3 disks, every third of every disk contains parity information.

I normally love being out-nitpicked ;)

However, in this case we both said the same thing - for any given stripe one of the disks contains parity info.
 

My Computer

...
Most larger hardware RAID arrays use RAID 5 as the basic building element. Again, it's a stripe set, except that for any given stripe across the disks one of the disks contains only parity information which can be used to reconstruct the original data should any single disk fail. The setup is truly "redundant" in the sense that it is fault tolerant. With massive hardware controllers it can come close to providing the speed of RAID 0 while still being as safe as RAID 1 - two disks must die (without replacement) before the data is completely lost.
With RAID 5, assuming n as the number of drives involved and size as the size of the smaller disk, you have (n - 1) * size space for data. By the way, parity information isn't contained in only one disk, but in every 1 / n portion of every disk. So if you have 3 disks, every third of every disk contains parity information.

I normally love being out-nitpicked ;)

However, in this case we both said the same thing - for any given stripe one of the disks contains parity info.
Not exactly: a part of all disks contains parity info.
Sorry, I didn't want to out-nitpick you...
 

My Computer

System One

  • CPU
    AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+
    Motherboard
    Asus M2N-E SLI
    Memory
    4 GB
    Graphics Card(s)
    2 x NVidia 8600 GTS
    Sound Card
    Integrated CM-6501
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Benq 19" + LG 17"
    Screen Resolution
    1280x1024@32bit@75MHz
    Hard Drives
    1 x Seagate 120GB SATA (OS installation)
    1 x Seagate 200GB SATA
    2 x Seagate 320GB SATA (Hardware RAID 0)
    1 x Seagate 250GB IDE (in external USB box)
    1 x TrekStor 750GB USB
    PSU
    650W
    Keyboard
    Logitech Cordless Desktop EX 100
    Mouse
    Logitech Cordless Optical
    Internet Speed
    8192 kbps / 640 kbps
I normally love being out-nitpicked ;)

However, in this case we both said the same thing - for any given stripe one of the disks contains parity info.
Not exactly: a part of all disks contains parity info.
Sorry, I didn't want to out-nitpick you...

No need to be sorry at all. If someone is wrong, the technical mistake should be pointed out - it's a technical forum and reliability of info is important. Hence, please don't ever be bashful about correcting mistakes in anything I've written :)

Now to clarify why I think we're saying the same thing...

A "stripe" in this context means a linear path across all disks in a RAID0/5 array whose width is implementation-specific. For example, if the implementation relies on 64KB chunks, a "stripe" is comprised of 64KB on disk 0, 64KB on disk 1, 64KB on disk 2, and 64KB on disk N. In a RAID 5 array, one of the disks contains parity info for each stripe but that doesn't mean it's always the same disk for all stripes. (In fact, that would make it RAID 3 which has some advantages but that's a different story).

Collectively, all of the "stripes" are known as the "stripe set" but those two names (in quotes) are not synonymous. I think you may have read "stripe set" into my use of "stripe".
 

My Computer

Hello Exbrit,

Do not worry about the RAID0 setup, I'm running it without any problem. I guess the important thing is to create raid with two brand new drives, not just to add the new one to old drive and make them run in raid.
Btw, you can always break the raid setup and set your disks in the conventional one, if you worry about your data and the Alienware sell machines with raid, only. The most important thing when you have the RAID0 is to make the frequent backup.


Thanks, I guess I should "go with the flow", as they say, and adopt RAID. With RAID are there any things one has to be aware of if one is repairing or reinstalling Vista?


There is nothing to worry about. The Raid setup is treated the same as the single drive, you can partition it the same way, installing or repairing operating system is the same. Once the ride is made you can forget about it and enjoy it. It's faster then the single hard drive in reading and writing data.

I created four Raid Volumes. The first one for the Operating System, Documents, and Programs. The second is used for Recovery, I store the image of the OS over there. The third and fourth partition is for my data, media including pictures, music, videos and such.
The first Volume I set to Raid 0, Stripe Size: 16kb, it's about 50 GB large. The rest Volumes are set to Raid 0, Stripe Size: 128kb, the recovery is 17GB large and the rest two partitions is about 432GB each.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Gateway P7805u FX
    CPU
    Intel Core2Duo T9600 2.80GHz 1066MHz FSB
    Motherboard
    Intel PM45
    Memory
    8GB 1066MHz DDR3
    Graphics Card(s)
    Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTS 1GB DDR3
    Monitor(s) Displays
    LG 17" WUXGA TFT
    Screen Resolution
    1920x 1200
    Hard Drives
    WD 2x500GB
    Case
    notebook
    Other Info
    BT/BD
I can see that I'm going to have to do a lot of reading about this. Thanks for the information. Is the speed gain really worth all this fuss?
 

My Computer

System One

  • Operating System
    Win 10 Pro x64 x 2
    Manufacturer/Model
    Alienware ALX x58
    CPU
    Intel® Core™ i7-975 Extreme O/C to 4.02 GHz, 8MB Cache
    Motherboard
    Asus® P6T Deluxe V2 X58 LGA1366
    Memory
    24GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 SDRAM at 1600MHz - 6 x 4096MB
    Graphics Card(s)
    1792 MB NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 295 Dual Core
    Sound Card
    Onboard Soundmax® High-Definition 7.1 Performance Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Samsung XL2370 HD LED backlit 23" W/S 2ms response time
    Screen Resolution
    1920 x 1080
    Hard Drives
    2 x 500gb SATA II
    1 x 1TB SATA II
    1 external eSATA LaCie 3TB
    (Non-RAID)
    PSU
    Alienware® 1200 Watt Multi-GPU
    Case
    Unique
    Cooling
    4 case fans @ CPU water cooling.
    Internet Speed
    1gb/s up and down
I can see that I'm going to have to do a lot of reading about this. Thanks for the information. Is the speed gain really worth all this fuss?

I'm not the expert, but I think so. What I can say, it's really fast when I convert the audio or video files to another formats. :)
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Gateway P7805u FX
    CPU
    Intel Core2Duo T9600 2.80GHz 1066MHz FSB
    Motherboard
    Intel PM45
    Memory
    8GB 1066MHz DDR3
    Graphics Card(s)
    Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTS 1GB DDR3
    Monitor(s) Displays
    LG 17" WUXGA TFT
    Screen Resolution
    1920x 1200
    Hard Drives
    WD 2x500GB
    Case
    notebook
    Other Info
    BT/BD
I guess it depends what one does the most on the machine. I'm thinking of an Alienware machine for reasons other than gaming and music/video processing, although I will be doing some of that. I have a lot of CPU intensive shared computing applications which, at the present time, have to throttle back when I'm doing other things. On a Core i-7 rig it should be a breeze to do a lot more simultaneously. Plus I have work that I do that is also resource hungry.
Plus their machines are extremely well put together if not slightly overpriced.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Operating System
    Win 10 Pro x64 x 2
    Manufacturer/Model
    Alienware ALX x58
    CPU
    Intel® Core™ i7-975 Extreme O/C to 4.02 GHz, 8MB Cache
    Motherboard
    Asus® P6T Deluxe V2 X58 LGA1366
    Memory
    24GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 SDRAM at 1600MHz - 6 x 4096MB
    Graphics Card(s)
    1792 MB NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 295 Dual Core
    Sound Card
    Onboard Soundmax® High-Definition 7.1 Performance Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Samsung XL2370 HD LED backlit 23" W/S 2ms response time
    Screen Resolution
    1920 x 1080
    Hard Drives
    2 x 500gb SATA II
    1 x 1TB SATA II
    1 external eSATA LaCie 3TB
    (Non-RAID)
    PSU
    Alienware® 1200 Watt Multi-GPU
    Case
    Unique
    Cooling
    4 case fans @ CPU water cooling.
    Internet Speed
    1gb/s up and down
Back
Top