Hey guys,
I've been running an C2D 8500 for about a year now. Been a brilliant chip, rediculous OC ability, with rock solid stability. I must say I have been very happy with it and to be honest, it could go for another twelve months without any dramas.
But I'm giving some serious thought to upgrading to a quad chip. Probably a Q9550 or a Q9650.
I have my 8500 running at 3800MHZ, which is plenty enough for me. I have it under a Thermalright 120 with temps under full load around 45 degrees. I think that is pretty solid. I've had it at 4.0 stable, but I wanted the whole thing to be a bit cooler. I recently put it in an Antec 1200 case, which has rediculous airflow...I also have a GTX280 card that runs stock under rediculous load @ 55-57 degrees. I am more than happy with those temps. Especially on the GPU.
I multibox World of Warcraft. I see the real benefit in moving to a quad is being able to set core affinity to create a better running experience when running five instances of the program. Its a long story.
Is a 9650 worth the extra $$ over the 9550? Granted you get an extra .17Mhz out of the box, but is that worth the extra?
On top of that, Under air, say OC'd to 3800 or so, with BOTH of those chips, what could I expect the idle & load temps to be?
Also, any opinion on the performance of these quad CPU's would be appreciated.
I know the 8500/8600 dual core chips are dead set OC demons. I'll be upgrading an older box with my tried and tested 8500...Thats for sure.
Any assistance would be appreciated.
I've been running an C2D 8500 for about a year now. Been a brilliant chip, rediculous OC ability, with rock solid stability. I must say I have been very happy with it and to be honest, it could go for another twelve months without any dramas.
But I'm giving some serious thought to upgrading to a quad chip. Probably a Q9550 or a Q9650.
I have my 8500 running at 3800MHZ, which is plenty enough for me. I have it under a Thermalright 120 with temps under full load around 45 degrees. I think that is pretty solid. I've had it at 4.0 stable, but I wanted the whole thing to be a bit cooler. I recently put it in an Antec 1200 case, which has rediculous airflow...I also have a GTX280 card that runs stock under rediculous load @ 55-57 degrees. I am more than happy with those temps. Especially on the GPU.
I multibox World of Warcraft. I see the real benefit in moving to a quad is being able to set core affinity to create a better running experience when running five instances of the program. Its a long story.

Is a 9650 worth the extra $$ over the 9550? Granted you get an extra .17Mhz out of the box, but is that worth the extra?
On top of that, Under air, say OC'd to 3800 or so, with BOTH of those chips, what could I expect the idle & load temps to be?
Also, any opinion on the performance of these quad CPU's would be appreciated.
I know the 8500/8600 dual core chips are dead set OC demons. I'll be upgrading an older box with my tried and tested 8500...Thats for sure.
Any assistance would be appreciated.
My Computer
System One
-
- Manufacturer/Model
- My build
- CPU
- Core2Quad Q9550 yorkfield C1 3.8G
- Motherboard
- GIGABYTE GA-EP45-UD3R
- Memory
- 8gig Kingston HyperX 8500 CL5
- Graphics card(s)
- Gigabyte GTX280 1G...generally stock.
- Sound Card
- onboard
- Monitor(s) Displays
- Samsung 24" 2433bw + Benq 19" FP91G+
- Hard Drives
- 2 x Samsung 500G Raid0 1 x Samsung 1TB 32
- PSU
- Thermaltake Toughpower 850W
- Case
- Antec twelve hundred.
- Cooling
- Air...a lot of air. Thermalright 120 push/pull,8 case fans,
- Mouse
- Logitech G5
- Keyboard
- Logitech G15
- Internet Speed
- ADSL2