• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

VGA Charts 2008: 101 Configurations Tested : Five Generations Tested


Staff member
Oklahoma, USA
VGA Charts 2008: 101 Configurations Tested : Five Generations Tested
1:50 AM - September 15, 2008 by Tino Kreiss

Five Generations Tested

Our largest and most up-to-date 3D comparison covers 101 different graphics cardgraphics card configurations spanning five technology generations. The test includes the Radeon X800radeon x800 , X1000, HD 2000, HD 3000, GeForce 6, 7, 8, 9 families, as well as the new HD 4000 series from AMD and both of the GTXgtx 200 models from Nvidia. A total of 500 hours of work was invested in the 6,767 test values, which consist of tests taken at three resolutions (1280x1024, 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 pixels) both with and without anisotropic filtering (AF) and anti-aliasing (AA).

The local grid provided more than 110,000 watts of power for our tests, while the neighbors were serenaded by the maximum noise level of 58.3 dB(A) when running AMD’s Radeonradeon HD 2900 XT CrossFire and X1950 CrossFirex1950 crossfire . The GTX 260 SLI and 8800 Ultra SLIsli reached temperatures of over 100 degrees C, causing the GPUs with no additional fans to give up and either choke thermally or crash the PC.

With an artificially-imposed speed limit set by the Core 2 Extreme X6800core 2 extreme x6800 running at 2.93 GHz, the current dual-card solutions made up of two Radeon HD 4870s, GeForce GTX 260s or GTX 280s showed very little or no improvement in overall performance. The SLI and CrossFire configurations are frequently slower than a single card due to badly optimized games. In this test environment, the right benchmark and the selected resolution determine whether purchasing the most powerful 3D boards is actually worthwhile. Performance differences are most perceptible at 1680x1050 or 1920x1200 resolutions when AA is enabled.

Editor’s Note: The following five pages will tell you all about the cards we tested, the benchmarks we ran, the settings we chose, the bugs we ran into, and the results we saw. On the last page of this introduction to our newest charts, right underneath our recommendations on which cards to consider, you’ll find a link straight to the data. Use that page for all of your own product comparisons.

Read more at the Source:
VGA Charts 2008: 101 Configurations Tested : Five Generations Tested - Tom's Hardware

My Computers

System One System Two

  • Show second system?
    Operating System
    Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
    Intel i7-8700K 5 GHz
    ASUS Maximus X Code Z370
    16 GB (8GBx2) G.SKILL TridentZ DDR4 3200 MHz
    Graphics Card(s)
    Sound Card
    Monitor(s) Displays
    3 x 27" Asus VE278Q
    Screen Resolution
    Hard Drives
    250GB Samsung 960 EVO M.2,
    256GB OCZ Vector,
    6TB WD Black WD6001FZWX
    Seasonic Prime Titanium 850W
    Corsair Air 740
    Corsair Hydro H115i
    Logitech MX Master
    Logitech wireless K800
    Internet Speed
    300 Mb/s Download and 30 Mb/s Upload
    Other Info
    Logitech Z625 speaker system,
    Creative F200 webcam,
    HP Color LaserJet Pro MFP M477fdn,
    Linksys EA9500 router,
    Arris SB6190 cable modem,
    Lumia 1520 phone
  • Operating System
    Windows 10 Pro
    HP Envy Y0F94AV
    i7-7500U @ 2.70 GHz
    16 GB DDR4-2133
    Graphics card(s)
    NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
    Sound Card
    Conexant ISST Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    17.3" UHD IPS touch
    Screen Resolution
    3480 x 2160
    Hard Drives
    512 GB M.2 SSD

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 0)